God and Evolution

[Morpheus]

Yes, I do.

The concept, Ecth. is so well entrenched now in human psychi and understanding, that is has been excellently illustrated in popular media now, and by the Wachowski's.
Back in 1999.
Which same aligns with the "Holographic Universe", as proposed by Physicst Brian Greene,
"The Mathematical Universe" involving Max Tegmark. And others of course.

Also in '99, "The Thirteenth Floor" realeased in the media, and "Existenze".
As well... physicist Julian Barbour's work came out,
"The End of Time".

Also understood is how Space is involved with Time. Yes?

Video, involving Professor of Physics, Michio Kaku...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jremlZvNDuk
Concerning, "The Mathematical Universe".

Who, himself also states:
"The universe is a symphony of strings, and the mind of God that Einstein eloquently wrote about for thirty years would be cosmic music resonating through eleven-dimensional hyper space."

Who, in his book, "Hyperspace" discusses the validity of the Wachowski's illustration, also.


My profile quote below is illustrative, as well, from Einstein.
Who stated, as is documented...
"Time and Space are modes in which we think, and not conditions in which we live."

Atheists however continue to hate, deny, and eschew this.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eschew

So, involving the thread topic, again both Evolution and Creation are evident. Any Creation or, "Program", has a Creator or "Programmer", of it.

Originally Posted by Morpheus

Atheists however continue to hate, deny, and eschew this.

Yet more generalisations Morph.
A good proportion of the physicists who help us to understand the nature of the universe are atheists.
Stephen Hawking springs to mind.

[Morpheus]

In fact, regarding the state of things, Phyisicsts who want to have a career keep their faith in low profile.

Yes, Stephen Hawking is very good at the math equations. However, he himself admits to errors.

[SemperVI]

Perhaps one is the intrinsic value of the other. Without creation, there would be no cause for evolution. Without evolution, there would be no purpose in creation.

To what extremes this occurs is still a mystery and too me. The more we learn about life, the more complex and puzzling the question becomes. I do not think this science is anywhere near settled.

[hybrid]

Originally Posted by dreamerkid_24

Some say god created the everything,some say evolution I say both. What do you think

sincerely and honestly?

i don't know

I'm not sure what you by "the everything" but, I'm a believer of life as we know it is from evolution and not creationism.

[r6r6]

1) Simple( part ) > Complex( whole )

2) Complex( whole ) > Simple( part )
-----------------------
1) Evolution as resultant of primary set of intentions to direct our evolution that specific way/driection,

2) Evolution as 2ndary resultant i.e. a 90 degree, precessionay side affect of our primary intented evolution directions.

Universe = God{ ess } = Great Mama = Great Spirit = Cosmos etc....

We live in an eternally existent and finite, occupied space Universe, that is embraced by macro-micro infinite, non-occupied space. imho

r6

Perhaps I see things differently then everyone here. I see that reality exists as intent and will. We intend awareness into perception.

[r6r6]

Originally Posted by somnium

Perhaps I see things differently then everyone here. I see that reality exists as intent and will. We intend awareness into perception.

Awareness of physical / energy precedes metaphysical conceptualization thereof i.e. I think about a physical / erngy something experience, via a physical / energy something, called a nervous system if not more specifically a brain.

Experience precedes the metaphysical concepts about--- derived from --the experience. imho

No physical / energy existence means there can be no metaphysical conceptulization. imho

Originally Posted by r6r6r

Awareness of physical / energy precedes metaphysical conceptualization thereof i.e. I think about a physical / erngy something experience, via a physical / energy something, called a nervous system if not more specifically a brain.

Experience precedes the metaphysical concepts about--- derived from --the experience. imho

No physical / energy existence means there can be no metaphysical conceptulization. imho

That is merely the awareness you are intending into form. If you can become aware of the unformed potential of reality, before it is cast into form, you can better see how even our bodies and our brains are formed with intent and will. You can perceive it either way, because the potential exists in every way, but be sure that you accept the results of that awareness before you accept it. Reality itself is made of infinite potential.