What is sacred geometry? Thanks

[Guillaume]

Originally Posted by Gem

but because space is itself 3 dimensional in nature due to motion, and indeed distance, being a relational constraint you can't add 5 points without creating a longer distance between 2 of them (thus the triangular di-pyramid for N=5).

I understand but that's not how electrons organize actually, they go in layers with a certain sequence / logic in populating them.
And they make a field, their individual position at an instant doesn't matter much.
There are many 3d simulations now that are quite fancy.

[Redchic12]

Yes I read some of Drunvalo Melchizedek books a few years ago and found them fascinating. Was going to mention them a few days ago but couldn’t remember his name. So anyone interested, I just wanted to say that I would also recommend them.

[Gem]

Originally Posted by JustBe

Say what? Lol you’re now our current maths wiz! Haha

I was just quoting the wiki article which was saying N5 etc to mean 5 electrons. I don'ttalk like that myself, but on my own I am nerdy enough to think about geometric things. I don't buy into 'sacred geometry' like a pentagon and the devil, or the Star of David, or the Flower of Life. People like the flower of life because symmetrical shapes can be drawn from it, but the circles could be drawn from a graph-sheet of equilateral triangles, which is nothings but triangle graph paper. I agree the FOL is very pretty and has cool geometric properties, but it's really a story about dimensions which are 'woven into each other' so to speak, and ultimately constrained into 3 dimensions. It's constrained because one thing is relative to another at a fundamental level, so if we have things, we necessarily have that constraint.

People don't like it because having a constraint means some things are impossible. People want to believe 'anything's possible', but what I think they miss is 'anything's possible' and 'infinite possibility' are completely different things,

[JustBe]

@Gem

Gotcha! I’m no maths wiz myself so when you start talking in this way, it goes over my head mostly..

I’ve not been one to get into sacred geometry as such. I’m aware of patterns and the interconnectedness of such patterns that exist as a whole through natures provisions. There is a balanced order in creation even if it we can’t see or don’t notice because of imbalance one with it.

I do recall one time deep in my deeper awakening feeling drawn to draw hexagons all over my back porch. They were all seperate but the same. I don’t even recall now at what point it opened in me, but obviously it was some kind of me and something bigger than me intersecting to see the relationship in some way. It was obviously an intuitive response at that point, because I couldn’t relate to it with reason.. was it perhaps an old maths teaching that sprung from the well
of old school doodling? Maybe lol.

Maybe there is a deeper meaning to that intersecting moment, I don’t know. In going deeper into the heart of my own origins, I suspect it was opening ancient symbolism and creation where it all formed at the heart of life?


.

[Gem]

Originally Posted by JustBe

@Gem
Maybe there is a deeper meaning to that intersecting moment, I don’t know. In going deeper into the heart of my own origins, I suspect it was opening ancient symbolism and creation where it all formed at the heart of life?

It's like a fractal zoom such as the Mandelbrot set. It's a very simple equation that generates infinite geometric variations where no 2 variations are exactly the same (but they are similar). They call it 'self similarity'. Hence there are infinite possibilities but what happens can only happen if it's allowed by the equation. The equation is 'the constraint' as I'm calling it

The universe is dead easy. 2 points share the exact same distance between them. That's just saying A relates to B exactly as B relates to A - there is relational constraint. It's so easy, so trivial it's not even worth thinking of, but then again - mind blown!

[eezi-ulgen]

Here is Dr. Gilberts partial explanation of Sacred geometry from his series on the Gaia channel which is on his Youtube channel.
If anyone be interested.
(There are 18 episodes on Gaia but it is a subscription based channel)

Episode 1 (30:55 mins.)
Masters of the Net - Full Episode from the Gaia series "Sacred Geometry: Spiritual Science"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elqqmPj8Y3Q

Episode 2 (7:37mins.)
GOLD Triangle Practice - Episode 2 from the Gaia series "Sacred Geometry: Spiritual Science"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TelwHFmZYE

Peace and Bless

[Unseeking Seeker]

@ eezi-ulgen ~ fascinating! Thanks for sharing. It’s admirable actually, how Dr. Gilbert has presented the preliminaries of sacred geometry.

All this is good to know, although I don’t see myself engaging in any formatted practice as yet, be it visualisation or otherwise.

[eezi-ulgen]

Originally Posted by Unseeking Seeker

All this is good to know, although I don’t see myself engaging in any formatted practice as yet, be it visualisation or otherwise.

I don't find the teachings or practices helpful in my own endeavors,
though I do appreciate learning of someone else's point of view..
Previously I would have probably just brushed off Rosicrucianism as a cult like group..
So at least I get to expand my knowledge and tear down some prejudices..
Dr. Gilbert seems pleasant and I hear some universal truths come trough..

[Gem]

I think the videos are fine if we can say anything as if it's true, make claims without any substance, present as facts that without evidence, talk geometry without logic, and call that documentary. If that's the standard, then the video passes muster.

[JustBe]

Originally Posted by Gem

It's like a fractal zoom such as the Mandelbrot set. It's a very simple equation that generates infinite geometric variations where no 2 variations are exactly the same (but they are similar). They call it 'self similarity'. 2 points share the exact same distance between them. blown!

You got me reading up on self similarity. I understand now what you’re sharing.

We humans do tend to make complex arrangements out of the simplicity so I guess sacred geometry gives things a fancy name..