Certainty

[Mr Interesting]

I am back to express something I thought I missed out and it seems to be within how you put together what i wrote Papa Bear and now that I'm here writing I seem to have forgotten what it was specifically.

But I do find the role of Bodhisattva very interesting especially, and not that I do see myself as one but that the idea of having such is interesting, in the sense that some questions can be answered in words whilst others can only be referred somehow to silence... even while we might be able to answer them it somehow would not be honouring the persons own ability to reflect the questions back to themselves and being as if we cannot answer is of no matter whilst also somehow, an expression of ignorance, being required within the part we might be playing.

But now to work, put off too long.

[Papa Bear]

Hi Mr I,

Originally Posted by Mr Interesting

I am back to express something I thought I missed out and it seems to be within how you put together what i wrote Papa Bear and now that I'm here writing I seem to have forgotten what it was specifically.

I have a sense, that words are not the means by which you could have expressed the missing part, “that some questions can be answered in words whilst others can only be referred somehow to silence...”
As questioning/reflecting in words, how or what `bliss` can be, can hinder “the act of seeing it we are able to bring more of what is is to what we are becoming.” Reflected well in your expression, “the persons own ability to reflect the questions back to themselves”. Is a more natural reflection than worded translation/consideration, as “if we cannot answer is of no matter” for we may already know its experiential awareness in `shared` reflection.