Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
05-05-2015, 11:31 AM
|
|
|
|
Has anyone noticed the nature of the Wikipedia article on this?
I have noticed that the Wikipedia page on this is somewhat not like a proper Wikipedia page. I have read a little about this and it seems somewhat imaginative but I do not know if it should really be referred to as pseudoscientific.
My question is maybe - is it in some way suggesting that it is using modern scientific methodology or is it purely idealistic? The reason I ask is because I felt changing the word "pseudoscientific" with something like "ideological" or "spiritual". I get the impression that it would just get rolled back almost immediately.
It seems like someone is on a missionary to discredit it. Why do so many people find this so appealing? Why do some people hate it? Is it like astrology?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.
|
