Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
17-06-2015, 01:48 PM
|
|
I'm not buying it.
Quote:
an aversion to drugs,inability to be programmed.I work hard,
|
Hippies were not interested in studying or in preparing themselves for careers. Droping out and tuning into drugs was the order of the day.
Quote:
Money is only a need to me, things don't matter, just love.
|
I'm not buying it. Sorry.
Quote:
except the shallow selfish nature of society
|
do you mean ACCEPT? to receive with approval or favor? So you're not accepting that society is shallow and selfish? Because you label the world as being
Quote:
In a world obsessed with self, materialism and power
|
.
|
17-06-2015, 02:05 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 3,745
|
|
|
|
Not me I was a young boy in the 60s,
|
17-06-2015, 03:05 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-bird
Hippies were not interested in studying or in preparing themselves for careers. Droping out and tuning into drugs was the order of the day.
|
Wow. You've been caught up in the myth. In fact, many hippies were college students. Most worked (school or jobs) and were productive. What you seem to buy is the tiny subset of hippies who got the media attention. Do some serious research and you'll discover sit-ins at universities among other facts that belie the post-hippie myths. In fact, the movement began on college campuses in opposition to the Vietnam war.
|
17-06-2015, 08:54 PM
|
|
Quote:
In fact, the movement began on college campuses in opposition to the Vietnam war.
|
No actually Allen Ginsberg is credited with starting the counterculture and that was in the 50's,The concept actually started as far back as the 40's. And what about the Human Be-in, protesting California banning the psychedelic drug,LSD.
|
18-06-2015, 03:34 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-bird
No actually Allen Ginsberg is credited with starting the counterculture and that was in the 50's,The concept actually started as far back as the 40's.
|
I guess you had to be there or study it more extensively. The generation before the hippies were "beatniks" (The Beats). Hippies were similar to, but not the same as beatniks. To be sure, there has always been a counterculture subset since time immemorial, long before Ginsburg, Kerouac, and the others, but I was addressing the hippies specifically.
Hippies picked up the counterculture "culture" but it was a specific outgrowth of antiwar sentiment. (For example, a lot of us knew back then that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was fabricated. It just took a few decades for it to become general knowledge.) So we have "antiwar" for the hippies as opposed to anti-militarism for the Beats. Similar, but not the same. The anti-militarism of the Beats became strident anti-war for hippies, entirely due to Vietnam.
Nearly everything is an outgrowth of something earlier. Few things are truly spontaneously unique. Addressing the hippies specifically doesn't deny the Beats or any other counterculture group. Before the Beats were the Bohemians. Before the Bohemians...etc., etc., etc.
|
18-06-2015, 11:24 AM
|
Ascender
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 794
|
|
|
|
|
People don't seem to realise that the Hippies of the late 60's and 70's didn't start that type of movement. It was around since the early 20th Century. Perhaps it was started before. During the Mazdak movement in Persia in the Middle Ages, with free love and vegetarianism. In the 16th Century was the "Merry Mount" colony of English settlers to the Americas, who danced around may poles and wore little clothing. Some dressed in leaves and flowers. There was Wandervogel in France and Germany in the late 19th century and early 20th who loved nature, paganism, free love, nudity and rejected society.
In a way it's like never new but always around.
|
18-06-2015, 11:33 AM
|
Master
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,579
|
|
|
|
|
i self identify as "hippy" but it's just a general label affixed to certain concepts and ideals that are held close by all styles of people.
|
18-06-2015, 12:30 PM
|
|
Vietnam was a major event but
the culture began from rejection to the conformists view of the 50's of how one should live their lives. Hatred of hypocrisy,corruption,conformity and authority, which then leads to the rebellion to the draft and the war. Which overall isn't a bad thing. Lets not forget how some treated the returning soldiers. I was there, to pick up my uncle ( only 8 years my senior) to have people make remarks as they passed by us. Where's the LOVE? And where are those hippies today? Working 9-5. All grown up? Their rebellion made for a very tumultuous time. Remember the race riots?
Where there predecessors? Yes
I have to add to the op, it is good you have a heart full of so much love. Born in 76, I am sure your parents were the true hippies.
|
18-06-2015, 01:15 PM
|
|
DONT TAKE IT PERSONALLY
deleted it, I second thought my post, it wasn't cool. I'm learning.
|
18-06-2015, 01:29 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,579
|
|
|
|
|
the media sure played up the rare incidences wherein "hippies" dissed the returning Nam vets as "baby killers". but let's face it... they were killing babies and other assorted unarmed civilians at the behest of the US government. remember The Mỹ Lai Massacre? and it was the first time a war was televised in gore splattered color. quite a shock to the American collective consciousness or more precisely the collective "conscience".
you might note that the government and the media learned a valuable lesson from Viet Nam. not only were the massive worldwide protests against the trumped up, for profit wars on Iraq and Afghanistan virtually ignored by the media but also by "imbedding" journalists in with the military we were only shown what the government wanted us to see. all we saw were those heroic soldiers fighting to save us all from terrorists (iow, killing and maiming and being killed and maimed on the behalf of Big Oil and Military Industrial Complex). the American public was spared the conscience invoking discomfort of actually seeing the bloody horrors our military perpetrated on the people of Iraq and Afghanistan. what a shame that the much more valuable lesson of "make love, not war!" wasn't so successfully digested.
you can hate on "hippies" all you want but those courageous youngsters, armed only with flowers, were often savagely beaten by the police, even mercilessly shot down by the National Guard, for exercising their freedom of speech. see Kent State. "hippy punching" is a 55 yr old tradition in America. the status quo always demonizes those who seek to motivate societal change.
the race riots were the fault of the "hippies"? had nothing to do w/ the way black people were/are treated in America?
Last edited by Internal Queries : 18-06-2015 at 02:35 PM.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:43 PM.
|