Just going through the thread again. I sort of sense that the people here on SF's Astrology forum who have spent the most time working at astrology
are intuitive types - whether they think of themselves much this way or not.
Working with the horoscope elements has come naturally to them. For this reason, they haven't much thought about the difference between the interpretation they can give to a horoscope and the "interpretation" a computer is capable of - which can be an unintegrated, jumbled mess.
My
thanks to those who have replied.
But maybe what I've just mentioned, above, is why so few
did reply.
Linear Mode
