"God is...nothing else is."

[davidsun]

Originally Posted by Kerubiel

Yeah, I suppose, but for me I never quite found a shared reality with other master dreamers present within it. I did create my own realities with "drop spots" where other master dreamers may land within my reality. The drop spots reaching the multiverses with access extending outward to both mine and other master's locations.

Note: 'conjoint' (and in that sense 'shared') doesn't mean that one always is, or ever 'should' be, in agreement (in the sense of 'aligned') with any and all other 'dreamers', so-called 'master dreamers' included.

Extreme analogical example: The 'dreams' of white blood cells (leukocytes) are along the lines of indentifying and and eliminating the 'dreams' of anti-life elements from the 'body' of a being.

I am glad you've dream-set things up so I could dream-drop 'into' your dream like this, Kerubial. High-Five, Fellow-Dreamer!

Originally Posted by Kerubiel

I also had to so masters could drop in anytime where I was. I didnt like that tho, as some of them would interfere with my own reality. So I stopped doing that.

I still continue to be open to 'surveying' the 'field' of other 'dreamers', which means I allow (sometimes I even look for) others 'dreams' to 'drop in' on me/mine. But I am quick to go 'my own' way nowadays as soon as I have finished considering and either choosing to join in or separate from said 'other' dreamers dreams. I don't 'allow' for what I think you mean by 'interference', in other words.

Originally Posted by Kerubiel

These days I keep it simple. I stay for the most part in an average reality, heavily blessed and beautiful. People don't know me here, and I keep to myself watching from a distance the little things life has to offer.

Not many 'know' or 'groove with' the specifics of my dream. But I am still in 'the more (who know) the merrier' mode. The simpler to execute 'watching from a distance' mode is just a second best 'fallback' dream, in my case.

[Miss Hepburn]

You get it. You really get it.

Originally Posted by handy guy

there is only one of us, the rest is a movie.

[handy guy]

Originally Posted by God-Like

This is why the neti neti approach is flawed .

There is nothing that we are not .. at a grass root level .


x daz x

Flawed perhaps, but as good as any other approach I suppose.

At the grass root level, we are no thing, and therefore we can become any thing we wish to, and back again...and again... and again....

Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn

Ha! Quite the statement, eh?

That basically sums up ACIM... A Course In Miracles...
Well, and Ramana and Nisargadatta.
I dunno...can anything else be said after that !? Hahahahahlol

God is.... nothing else is.
God is everything that is.
I am God.
I am everything that is.
I is.... nothing else is.

[davidsun]

Originally Posted by handy guy

there is only one of us, the rest is a movie.

Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn

You get it. You really get it.

Let's see if I have this right: I 'read' the above statements to mean:

(1) that 'the one' (i.e. 'God') is the script writer, producer, director of and the multiple actors in said 'movie', and

(2) that 'us' actors individually (hopefully!) getting to the point of realizing and so basically dismissing what's going on 'in' said 'movie' as just being a hologramatic 'image' of said 'God' is whole 'point' (i.e. the 'punch line') of the 'movie'?

That's the whole 'reason' for God's whimsical 'creation', IOW?

[handy guy]

I' don't know, btw. what would you trade that black cap for? I got a new red one by mistake that is available.

[davidsun]

Originally Posted by handy guy

I' don't know, btw. what would you trade that black cap for? I got a new red one by mistake that is available.

That's a John Deere (logo) hat a friend brought me back from her visit with to frends who work for the company in Germany. No trade, no how. Very 'sorry' for your mistake!

[handy guy]

Thanks David, don't mind me that last full moon kind of blew my mind

[Kerubiel]

Originally Posted by davidsun

Note: 'conjoint' (and in that sense 'shared') doesn't mean that one always is, or ever 'should' be, in agreement (in the sense of 'aligned') with any and all other 'dreamers', so-called 'master dreamers' included.

Extreme analogical example: The 'dreams' of white blood cells (leukocytes) are along the lines of indentifying and and eliminating the 'dreams' of anti-life elements from the 'body' of a being.

I am glad you've dream-set things up so I could dream-drop 'into' your dream like this, Kerubial. High-Five, Fellow-Dreamer!


I still continue to be open to 'surveying' the 'field' of other 'dreamers', which means I allow (sometimes I even look for) others 'dreams' to 'drop in' on me/mine. But I am quick to go 'my own' way nowadays as soon as I have finished considering and either choosing to join in or separate from said 'other' dreamers dreams. I don't 'allow' for what I think you mean by 'interference', in other words.


Not many 'know' or 'groove with' the specifics of my dream. But I am still in 'the more (who know) the merrier' mode. The simpler to execute 'watching from a distance' mode is just a second best 'fallback' dream, in my case.

yeah interference sucks. I used to dream with dream teachers, inorganic life forms from an inorganic dream realm. They were notorious for teaching feats of power and yet they would often interfere seeking their own power over their apprentices dreams. Took me awhile to gain a foothold over my own dreaming in order to keep them out.

What are the specifics of your 'groove'? lol