Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JustASimpleGuy
That's not what physics says. There is no theory of luminiferous aether however there is Special Relativity and it doesn't require a medium.
This is way above my pay grade and yours too and until a viable theory with predictions backed up by experiment and observation is put forward the luminiferous aether is no more plausible than fairy dust. Every attempt to test and measure it have failed....
|
Ummmm it appears we have a case of throwing the dart then drawing the circle. You do realize that in this existence you can come up with a theory as to why something happened and it make perfect sense and pan out and then you can even predict future events based off of this theory and them pan out exactly like you said
and yet that not be the fundamental reason why it happened. Because in this life there can be more than one explanation for why things happened
and science has done a really good job at training people into thinking that there is a explanation and that explanation is fundamentally the only real explanation when that is just a neurotic approach to reality
There are two main theories one is atomism the other is The ether even Nikola Tesla talks about The ether.
keep in mind you're so confident about a perspective that has never been proven. No one is laid eyes on an "atom" or even a "photon" and the majority of experiments done are stretched to say the least
Like the double slit experiment which is a far cry from what I would call a real test . But its all **** in the wind and we will just have to agree to disagree and that's totally fine.
Threaded Mode