Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iamit
What are you certain (unperturbed) about?
|
your question does not apply.
As I said before: what I call 'certainty' is not about 'knowing something [as object]', is empty of a sentiment of truth, is empty of subject and object.
In what I call 'certainty' there is neither self nor other. That is why I called it an 'experience of imperturbability' ... which however is liguistically limited because there isn't an experiencer.
Let's summarize so far:
1. We do not share a view. From the concatenations of linguistic signs we apply in given contexts we can conclude that our views are different.
2. At first glance it may appear that we agree that "truth is a trap" but looking closer this agreement turns out to be an illusion. Why? Because the meaning of the word 'truth' is different for both of us. The meaning of the word 'truth' results from the different perspectives of our different views.
From my perspective any sentiment of truth is based on innate misperception which means that because it is innate eradication of innate truth habits is very tricky.
Threaded Mode