Quote:
Originally Posted by relinquish
I'm not saying that IT is nothing, but rather that IT is just as much everything as IT is nothing.
|
Yes I see what you are getting at. IT is just as much no
thing as it is some
thing - that’s pretty self-evident as it’s a tautology. But IT is never not something/something-ness (and by this I mean IT presents, IT ‘occurs’, IT IS.) IT is never nothing - IT is never NOT (and if it were it could never be known as such.) IT is synonymous with (and these words are merely placeholders) Reality/Oneness/the Everything (your capital E to denote an
absolute sense of the word) which presents as ALL that is - void of inherent existence. The addition of an absolute Nothing (again, your capitalisation) is (for me) a duality too far.
Again, I think our differences are mainly linguistic/semantic - perhaps it’s the capitalisations.