OK, let's get one thing straightened out, Powessy. I have no problem with you having beliefs. I'm not trying to stop you do your thing.
I took exception to you first because you were sharing a fearful philosophy which I thought just deserved a counterpoint. The second time it was because of your interpersonal manner.
Do whatever you feel you need to do with your djinn or spirits. Have your Way. I'm not (and never did) try to stop you.
I don't think you're less than me.
Discernment is telling which things will help us personally, spiritually. Judgement is using polarities to be higher, or lower, than someone else. 'He is an idiot,' can be discernment or judgement, depending on who the speaker is feeling and thinking when he says it.
The whole point of my comments about spiritual lessons is to demonstrate that we are equal psychologically, learning different lessons.
Recognising fearful beliefs is important. It's pure psychology. It's self knowledge, there's not even anything spiritual about it!
Fearful beliefs = a sick mind and a horrible life experience.
"Low vibration" is just a way of saying "psychologically unhealthy" in this context.
Quote:
Originally Posted by powessy
The real you. Is the person that is trying to understand yourself. You are atheist but believe in the paranormal and the soul. You understand that raising vibrations is a bunch of poppy **** ...You read to much trying to fit your experiences into a box that does not exist....I think you are happy and have found strength in your life through your past experiences in the dark. You chose to believe there is darkness but when I talk of darkness you call it fear based this is a contradiction....
|
I'm sorry, Powessy, you really don't see the real me at all!
I'm not an atheist. I'm about as far from atheism as it's possible to get :) I've had direct experiences which have suggested certain things really exist – the paranormal and the soul, levels of vibration etc, and I've used them as a framework to develop self awareness. I don't believe in them for heavens sakes, lol
They're just tools for the psychology - tools that work!
I don't even believe what I
channel I certainly don't believe spiritualist jargon, though sometimes when you're talking about these things those are the only English words available...and actually...my experiences do back some of that "jargon" up so I figure that it's an easy way to communicate.
It's not poppycock, it's a framework people need to use until they realise raising vibration is a bit different to how they imagined. I'm not going into that subject now. Too complex.
I read, LOL?
I hardly read spiritual information at all! When I do it's only to share experiences on this forum, or about experiences I've already had. Even the latter is a VERY rare occurence. I deliberately don't read about this stuff because I want to simply experience and not be swayed by others' words or interpretations.
I haven't found strength from the dark. I've found strength from the light AND the dark together but moreso, from coming to know myself deeply, by reducing as far as I possibly can, illusions and fear. Amongst other things.
I was using 'darkness' in the context of low vibration. Pretty common usage, don't you think? Darkness in the literal sense is...just darkness. It's a concept. A metaphor. I don't see how discerning low vibration then calling it darkness for wont of a better word is a contradiction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by powessy
...This is a complete contradiction to your first words... You do state that in "fairness" showing me that you understand that this is a contradiction to your own beliefs.
Powessy
|
"You know no truth but your own"..."I believe what I experience directly."
All I'm saying is we all know our own truths only, and you clearly haven't internalised anything I've said...ergo...what I've said clearly isn't
your truth now. And then I said I never expected you to internalise, or for your personal truth to change and the only reason I CARE if they do or don't...is because of your interpersonal presentation of your beliefs;
You seem to present what you believe as fact and try to involve the pscyhological presence of anyone else reading. It's an insidious use of a fear-based psychology and belief in invisible entities, which you say are dangerous even to angels (the logical assumption would then be..."Well if they can hurt an angel they can obviously hurt a human, I must be in terrible spiritual danger!")
This creates a psychological fear state in some readers. Your belief could snare others into a state of misery and suffering and that is the ONLY reason I'm (foolishly) having this conversation.
...You know...I'm really starting to feel that there's nothing else to be said. I've definitely wasted enough of my life in this thread!