unconditional love, regardless of others' ignorance

[sound]

Originally Posted by Humm

People giving is love.

LOVE is giving the universe giving.

Yes, ... love in action ... love in deed

[Xan]

Also love in inaction... just being love...

As arive nan said, there's no one right way to express love.

As I allow my body-mind to be lead by my inner heart, there's just no telling how love gives itself through me. My preconceptions have been blown away.


Xan

Greetings..

Originally Posted by Xan

Also love in inaction... just being love...

As arive nan said, there's no one right way to express love.

As I allow my body-mind to be lead by my inner heart, there's just no telling how love gives itself through me. My preconceptions have been blown away.


Xan

I'm going to try, again.. i'm going to ask a sincere question, because i'm interested in an honest answer, and.. based on the answer, i might interested in further discussion..

In the bolded portion of the quote, there is the implication that love is consciously acting independent of, in this case Xan, but.. the larger implication is that love is 'separate from' the body-mind, and has its own intention apart from the body-mind.. is this a fair interpretation of the relationship described in the quote?

The reason my question is predicated by the first paragraph, is that there seems to be a generalized response to my inquires by some people.. the nature of that generalized response is defensive and resistant to interactive discussion, the result is that there are 'sides' and conflicts..

The intention of my inquiry is to discover the processes that lead to differences of understanding about the same experience.. i sense that the differences are related to how the experience feels to the experiencer, compared to similar feelings that are already part of the experiencer's personal mind-scape..

Anyhow, i am hopeful for some open insight into this quote's use of language relative to the understanding that inspires the message..

Be well..

Originally Posted by TzuJanLi

Greetings..


I'm going to try, again.. i'm going to ask a sincere question, because i'm interested in an honest answer, and.. based on the answer, i might interested in further discussion..

In the bolded portion of the quote, there is the implication that love is consciously acting independent of, in this case Xan, but.. the larger implication is that love is 'separate from' the body-mind, and has its own intention apart from the body-mind.. is this a fair interpretation of the relationship described in the quote?

The reason my question is predicated by the first paragraph, is that there seems to be a generalized response to my inquires by some people.. the nature of that generalized response is defensive and resistant to interactive discussion, the result is that there are 'sides' and conflicts..

The intention of my inquiry is to discover the processes that lead to differences of understanding about the same experience.. i sense that the differences are related to how the experience feels to the experiencer, compared to similar feelings that are already part of the experiencer's personal mind-scape..

Anyhow, i am hopeful for some open insight into this quote's use of language relative to the understanding that inspires the message..

Be well..

Who is it that called 'arguing to the death' sarcasm?

[Xan]

Love is what I am in essence... the body-mind is a costume love wears, often well disguised.


Xan

[Jyotir]

Originally Posted by TzuJanLi

Greetings..


LOL.. that was really pretty good.. sizzling sarcasm has it value, too..

Be well..

Hi TzuJanLi,

I would characterize it as more satire than sarcasm, but agree that in any case, there may be value when things get a bit too serious and self-absorbed.

~ J

The best answer I can give is to show love anyway. If someone insults you, do no react. If you see people acting stubborn and arrogant, do not continue to label them. Because if you do, you will become stubborn and arrogant.

[Silver]

Originally Posted by Scott

The best answer I can give is to show love anyway. If someone insults you, do no react. If you see people acting stubborn and arrogant, do not continue to label them. Because if you do, you will become stubborn and arrogant.

Bullseye, Scott.

Originally Posted by Scott

The best answer I can give is to show love anyway. If someone insults you, do no react. If you see people acting stubborn and arrogant, do not continue to label them. Because if you do, you will become stubborn and arrogant.

There are times when that is the correct action, and times when it is not.

I have one unbreakable rule I observe to guide every action: It depends.

[Silver]

Originally Posted by Humm

There are times when that is the correct action, and times when it is not.

I have one unbreakable rule I observe to guide every action: It depends.

Snickersnicker ~ always an out, ay!