Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvergirl
That sounds very interesting ~ something I'd like to check out ~ but then I'm thinking about the doc years ago that went mad trying to convince his colleagues they needed to wash their hands before performing surgeries and/or delivering babies. What about that? How does that fit in with what is now being said by Gerson about the germs and all?
|
I'm only about half way through this last book that I linked to and so far he's managed to give Louis Pasteur a sound drubbing... after reading this my
impression of Louis has gone from respectfully impressed with as an historical figure to now that of a showman, plagiarizer and dullard...
Louis Pasteur sounds like a first class sleaze maggot... clearly the author doesn't like the man..! :^)
Gerson's primary focus was on healing the body and not being distracted by attempting to attack a disease. His primary assumption, and he had the
cases to back him up, was that the body possesses an innate ability to heal itself if given the right nutrients, while, at the same time, actively
being cleansed of unwanted toxins.
While modern medicine views the process as the result of an invading army, and fires chemicals at the mix in the hope they'll hit the spot. They
don't work in harmony/holistically with the body, they treat it as a thing to be conquered.
When we see a disease in process there's another avenue of thought about this that's intriguing to explore. That is, that a body that's truly healthy
would not be vulnerable to such a thing taking place. And that to address it we need to spend less time on the disease itself and more time on healing
the body and bringing it back to it's full potential. Once the body is healed then the disease will be addressed by the body itself. A disease can only
occur within a body that's already compromised.
Take a look at this video of blood that's been treated with the Goji berry juice. The doctor is getting pretty bizarre and impressive results, but what
I'm focusing on here is the original condition of the blood at the beginning of the clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NVxC2iBpec
Now a person walking around who appears to be healthy may actually be living within a compromised system like this one. There's a lot of hidden
damage that's not outwardly discernible. So a person in this condition may end up getting sick and it would seem like the illness occurred from
contracting an invading bug from outside the system. And indeed part of this may actually be the case... but would the bug be able to proliferate if
the system was truly healthy and intact.
He's another link to read that goes into some detail of what's actually going on within our system. While reading the page you can actually gain a feel for
the gradients of health, from healthy to potential host.
http://www.rawfoodlife.com/how_raw_food_alkalizes_you.html
Assuming you had time to go over this stuff :^) lets now address your example above. Firstly not every woman would become infected by the
dirty doctors habits. However the exposure to this dirty doctor would put any woman who's at risk to the test. I asked my wife this morning if she
knew much about this and as expected she did (my dearest is a genius! :^) The problem here is with strep B. It's not uncommon to find strep B living in
the vagina of many women. Evidently it's not a huge issue otherwise we'd be hearing about outbreaks all the time. But what happens in childbirth is
the heavy introduction of fresh blood. My wife called this blood an Auger.. a growing medium for the Strep. Strep multiplies incredibly fast in this
medium! So the doctor gets exposed, doesn't wash, and then carries this critter onto the next woman.
And here's the qualifier.... is the woman is in such a state that leaves here open and vulnerable to the introduction of this bug? If she is generally
compromised then the bug may find plenty to feed off of, if she isn't then the bug would be naturally contained. The problem on the surface appears
to be the bug itself, but it may be the body in a weekend condition that then serves as a prime host for this little bug to feed on and grow.
Bacteria eats and excretes... so not only are we dealing with the occurrence of the bacteria but we're also confronting that added weight of
it's excretions.
So the bacteria's presence then "becomes" the problem but it was the woman's compromised system in the first place that provided the food that
it needed to thrive.
This way of looking at it takes some getting used to, and that's what I'm enjoying about your question. I'm trying to wrap my head around this as
well... we're so conditioned to think of the bug as the thing.. when it's likely to be far more complex than that.. and the perfect tool for dealing with
that complexity would be the innate integrity and built-in tools of a healthy and vibrant body itself.... :^)