Self - open discussion - Page 16

#**151** 22-01-2011, 05:19 AM

lol

i actually think sound nailed it with the title of the thread. "self- open discussion."

~*~*~as you were~*~*~

*exists stage left*

sound · #**152** 22-01-2011, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by meta_synthesis

lol

i actually think sound nailed it with the title of the thread. "self- open discussion."

~*~*~as you were~*~*~

*exists stage left*

I wish I was smarter because then I would probably know what you actually mean

for all I know you could be making fun of me lol

#**153** 22-01-2011, 06:08 AM

sound, I think it means

nobody knows

relax

nothing more to say

sound · #**154** 22-01-2011, 06:30 AM

ahhh ... I never would have known lol thanks pre-dawn

Gem · #**155** 22-01-2011, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrew g

I could make some guesses, but you will have to ask them.

Maybe they mean it's a thought.

hybrid · #**156** 22-01-2011, 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sound

ahhh ... I never would have known lol thanks pre-dawn

but again, he could probably meant we are full of ourselves.
it's best to clarify. LOL

.

sound · #**157** 22-01-2011, 07:15 AM

true hybrid ... we will wait for meta to explain it beta lol

andrew g · #**158** 22-01-2011, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hybrid

yes but there is a difference bet saying ...

1. all humans have brain, only an idiot would say "speak for yourself" on that one and if he/she did, it would be impossible to talk to himer.

2. all humans can be a 5D being. not everyone can subscribed to that and not everyone even want that in the first place.

as to the no goal as a goal. imo, this is a gobbledygook. to understand the elegance of that statement requires a quality of being, if you will. iow, it's not a world view everyone can relate to or understand.

.

Oh I see the difference between one and two. Its exactly as I said in that my world views that bring me to this forum arent ones that are always popular. I do think that one day all humans will be 5D beings.

I didnt understand the last paragraph. You think the goal of no goal is gobbledygook? You were the one who said it and referred it to the tao.....? Are you saying that not everyone has that goal? I would agree in one way but in another way I would say that everyone is seeking that in their own way in which they code it.

andrew g · #**159** 22-01-2011, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gem

Maybe they mean it's a thought.

Maybe. In that sense, every word is a thought.

Gem · #**160** 22-01-2011, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrew g

Maybe. In that sense, every word is a thought.

Well someone made them up and we retract them from memory...