Quote:
|
Originally Posted by naturesflow
Why is noticing cruel intent. Have you wondered if your own judgement has taken it upon himself to name it as such? And it has me wondering why you might pull cruel intent out of me noticing what I noticed.
I can speak its truth directly as I see. Their was no animosity in my expression of directly noticing something that caught my curiosity.
Do you not think that this is possible? To notice and express the noticing.
Would you consider it possible that your energy and words do dig him deeper in this issue you have throughout this thread? That you are influencing things on your side of things more so, than when Eelco is on his own and opening differently? Perhaps you could considered this in reflection of my offering? Or is it preferable that reaction to it and labelling it suits you best?
How you feel about reading my words of what I noticed, perhaps struck a chord in you that determined its own labelling.
I have considered your mention of cruel intent and that wasn't my intention. My intention was to state a fact in my noticing. End of story.
As for my use of the all the you's, I have come into your reality where you suggested it wasn't necessary and so you shouldn't have any issue with me over this. Unless of course Gem has convinced you otherwise.
.
|
What you have said isn't truth - Eelco has responded to this fact - it is OPINION.
Any subversion offered by you towards me only highlights the continued insistence to only communicate on your terms. Raziel has to look within, Raziel or any other apparent student of this superiority looks at every situation wrongly...
Its opinion.
Eeleco can talk in your chosen spiritual terms because he's studied them, he can use words that perhaps you prefer - if we were talking in Abrahamic religious terms I would perhaps concede a little for the sake of conversion.
I might say "The Profit Mohammed" to be respectful etc ..
Out in the world, especially when trying to understand others there is wriggle room. Hence my attempting to curb "you" language even though I think it is hyper sensitive to even care.
Attempting to point out that you essentially accept another poster via condition is not only judgemental its also a manipulation tactic.
Any single word I used to highlight this unspiritual behavior would have been turned around & pointed at me, my inclination etc ..
I wonder why my observation is deflected back yet yours is accepted as such?
These actions are nothing new, no originality.
I'd postulate that my language, my views are being envisioned as those of an aggressor - which is wrong - but whatever, I'm not a lone voice on here.
I have stated previously that I've seen the mask slips before - they reveal frightened children.
Whilst it is kind to sooth the frightened, telling them that "nothing bad will happen" leads to false securities - ending in harsher realisation in the end.
Forewarned is forearmed as they say.
~
Its not a nice lesson to learn but attempting to shoot the messenger shows how much denial exists.
Paint it as unloving or unconcerned if needs be - doesn't make it true.
If words contain a high level of understanding they simply do, no need to make them pretty & presentable as part of an overall safety blanket.
The wolves & bears don't fear soft blankets, cozy snuggly language prepared nobody past 6 years old for how hard life can be to navigate.
Nature gives us this example every day.
Who knows better than Gaia - the ancestral mother of all life: the primal Mother Earth goddess?
If her lessons are harsh towards the smallest chicks to the largest elephants - there is a genuine reason they exist.
.
Linear Mode
