The surface of a cube is subscribed by 4-fold 6 great circles {
tori } of 3-fold tetra{4}hedron.
See LINK
Proton is most stable fermionic matter humans know to exist and in Rybonics, defined by the above mentioned very stabilized 6 great circles {
tori }.
Two great circles { tori } = one quark and two quarks { 4 great VE circles/
tori = a meson { bosonic strong nuclear force } but two quark combinations as found VE are unstable ergo mesons are very unstable and very short lived particles.
So why is the neutron { neutral charge } differrent from the protons 6 great circles {
tori }? We might ask similar question regarding neutrality of neutrinoes.
Obviously, in the case of the neutrons ---same set of 6 great circles {
tori }----, it is the geometric relationship that makes them not as stable as the proton.
Since each of the 6
tori have a two flat curvature areas, ---that are halfway positions between peak positive and peak negative curvature ergo neutral { flat curvature } --- I wonder if it is way the trajectories { 0--->1--->2--->3 etc --that define each
tori--- interact with other in regards to these flat neutral places, that make those 6 very stable and charged { proton } or less stable as neutron { no charge }?
Here is
LINK to three kinds of Gaussian curvature
https://groups.io/g/synergeo/attachment/551/0?thumb=1 
Proton { Stable } Neutron { not stable }
Threaded Mode