Shroud of Turin

KnowwhatLies · #1 02-01-2023, 07:51 AM

The named burial cloth Shroud of Turin is a scientific proof to the power of Yahuah(YHWH) who sent his most beloved son, who's more accurate name to be either Yahusha, Yahushua or Yashua(either shortened versions but with the same likely meaning Yahu is Salvation or Yahu has saved) despite commonly refereed as Jesus, to be eternal ruler over the nations of the earth.

The following short video should mention all relevant scientific studies proving it cant be replicated.
Video link:
youtu.be/_9lMQlI32wE

Quote:

The ultraviolet light necessary to do so “exceeds the maximum power released by all ultraviolet light sources available today,” says Di Lazzaro. It would require “pulses having durations shorter than one forty-billionth of a second, and intensities on the order of several billion watts.”

from: nationalgeographic.com/history/article/150417-shroud-turin-relics-jesus-catholic-church-religion-science#close

What other teaching, religion has such a magnitude of footprint that gives them another angle to test them from falsehood.

Altair · #2 02-01-2023, 09:29 AM

Is the Shroud of Turin Real?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAQQ...annel=Metatron

sky · #3 02-01-2023, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowwhatLies

The named burial cloth Shroud of Turin is a scientific proof to the power of Yahuah(YHWH) who sent his most beloved son.

It is real but is it the burial cloth of Jesus ?. According to the 'latest' Scientific/DNA evidence it was created around the years1260 and 1390. Imo it is a beautiful work of Art and whoever took the time to create it obviously had a deep reverence for it's subject...

#4 02-01-2023, 03:58 PM

There comes a point when scientific proof of the spiritual must be realized as totally counterintuitive……an interesting sidelight but never a tool of evangelism….proof of God is a fool’s errand…….

Miss Hepburn · #5 02-01-2023, 10:54 PM

My 2 cents..I don't care what anyone says...To ME?
It is the 'radiation' or energy from being on Jesus as he resurrected. Period.
However, you say it.

And Mary has appeared all over, period, also. Don't care what naysayers say.
And thousands have been healed at Lourdes, so there.

BigJohn · #6 03-01-2023, 04:34 AM

As for the Shroud of Turin: it appears to be a 'miracle'.

Looking at the 'miracles' that have occurred in other religions, might give us a greater insight as to what is 'going on'.

Altair · #7 03-01-2023, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molearner

There comes a point when scientific proof of the spiritual must be realized as totally counterintuitive……an interesting sidelight but never a tool of evangelism….proof of God is a fool’s errand…….

I too think trying to find scientific proof of the spiritual can be a ''fool's errand''. If it's immaterial than it's going to be a bit difficult..

But the shroud is a different 'thing', surely.

It can be proven that a shroud is from a specific century. Whether it was worn by Jesus is another thing.

BigJohn · #8 04-01-2023, 01:06 AM

....... and then there is the question as to how the shroud was 'made'.

Traveler · #9 05-01-2023, 05:58 AM

The carbon dating of the shroud puts it at 1260-1390 AD.

KnowwhatLies · #10 05-01-2023, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sky

It is real but is it the burial cloth of Jesus ?. According to the 'latest' Scientific/DNA evidence it was created around the years1260 and 1390. Imo it is a beautiful work of Art and whoever took the time to create it obviously had a deep reverence for it's subject...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traveler

The carbon dating of the shroud puts it at 1260-1390 AD.

What latest scientific/DNA evidence? If the video or its sources would have been viewed such false comments would not been presented.

The energy alone would require something like nuclear blast, which were not available in these time periods and certainly cant be copied or recreated completely on all its microscopic or even atomic levels, even in our more advanced times. Its supernatrual, man could not have created it from the tools available.

The images in the shroud is also a 3d image on both sides and not 2d. Experiments showed that paintings cant do that.
_____https://shroud.com/pdfs/Correlation%20of%20Image%20Intensity%20Jackson%20J umper%20Ercoline%201984%20OCRsm.pdf

Assuming the "latest scientific method refer to the 1989 one, than the very scientist member Raymond Rogers who personally analyzed the shroud, disproved its own finding. New Peer Reviewed Date for the Shroud of Turin:______https://youtu.be/vtIZrc5fGEE

Quote:

The radiocarbon sample was thus not part of the original cloth and is invalid for determining the age of the shroud

The new calculated date is between 1300-3000 years old and not around 700 years old.

The sample for the carbon dating was wrong. Carbon dating should not have been relied upon yet people stick to it while a more important and significant evidence exist. Take as example ice cube, at specific temperature you could predict its total melting time, take a flame flower and the melting time would be different, far accelerated or a freezer that delays or stop the melting. How could you determine the age of that ice cubes in such none controlled environment where the weather is different. The same can apply to carbon dating.

Its like there is a veil over others that prevents from seeing the light of truth.