the created Jesus

[sky]

Originally Posted by keiw1

There is no trinity. God did it all through Jesus-Acts 2:22, 1 Cor 8:5-6

I personally believe in The Trinity....
John 5:7
For there are three that testify.

Matthew 28:19
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

1 Corinthians 12:4-6 “There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit distributes them. 5 There are different kinds of service, but the same Lord. 6 There are different kinds of working, but in all of them and in everyone it is the same God at work.

[sky]

Originally Posted by keiw1

Their own translating exposes them as false religion.

Yes that's your opinion to which you are entitled but Roman Catholics are also entitled to believe there Denomination is not false....

[Nowayout]

Originally Posted by keiw1

The OP bible passages are clear.

I don't know what your point is, that Jesus was just a man? Well, he was, and more.
A dog has a nose and so do we so dogs are just like us, but they can smell so much better..
Jesus had a body and so do we, but Jesus was the son of God, so...

[keiw1]

Originally Posted by Nowayout

I don't know what your point is, that Jesus was just a man? Well, he was, and more.
A dog has a nose and so do we so dogs are just like us, but they can smell so much better..
Jesus had a body and so do we, but Jesus was the son of God, so...

He had a mortal mother. God does not. God always was and always will be. Mere little mortals cannot possibly even kill a single angel, let alone kill God.

[keiw1]

Originally Posted by sky

Yes that's your opinion to which you are entitled but Roman Catholics are also entitled to believe there Denomination is not false....

Yes they are entitled. God gave all free will. Not my opinion. Their own translating proves them false. Their pictures of Jesus proves they do not know him. No Israelite male had long hair, it was a dishonor. Jesus would NEVER bring dishonor to his Fathers name. 1Cor 11:14

[Nowayout]

Originally Posted by keiw1

He had a mortal mother. God does not. God always was and always will be. Mere little mortals cannot possibly even kill a single angel, let alone kill God.

Trinity..

Let's see..

Jesus the man resurrected Lazarus from the dead.
Jesus the man healed the sick and blind.
Jesus the man was resurrected on the third day...

And was seen again.

What a man.

It's all been said in the bible, what's the story?

Just a man... Lol.

If Jesus farted would it stink...
Some Saints have this fragrance after they die.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odour_of_sanctity

And then some people just like to creat a stink...lol.

[sky]

Originally Posted by keiw1

Yes they are entitled. God gave all free will. Not my opinion. Their own translating proves them false. Their pictures of Jesus proves they do not know him. No Israelite male had long hair, it was a dishonor. Jesus would NEVER bring dishonor to his Fathers name. 1Cor 11:14

Considering that neither of us was present when Jesus walked this earth it would be ridiculous imo to say how long His hair was and to state that Roman Catholics translations are false because of pictures.I doubt very much that Jesus would be interested in how His image was visualised.

[keiw1]

Originally Posted by sky

Considering that neither of us was present when Jesus walked this earth it would be ridiculous imo to say how long His hair was and to state that Roman Catholics translations are false because of pictures.I doubt very much that Jesus would be interested in how His image was visualised.

Its much more than pictures. The bible condemns the usage of statues, icons and graven images. Their churches and houses are filled with all 3--- The bible says--Do not call any man on earth Father( Matt 23:9)--this is speaking about the clergy positions not dads.
God is the Holy Father not the Pope. He fathered nothing spiritual. All that came from God.

And the major problem with that scenario is that not a single branch off her fixed much of the problems because they( religion that came out of Rome) translated errors in to fit false council teachings, misleading billions. The protestants had no clue when they translated. Info was not readily available so easy back then.

[sky]

Originally Posted by keiw1

Its much more than pictures. The bible condemns the usage of statues, icons and graven images. Their churches and houses are filled with all three.The protestants had no clue when they translated. Info was not readily available so easy back then.

The Bible actually doesn't condemn the usage of Statues etc, it condemns the 'Worship' and Roman Catholics do not 'Worship' Statues etc:
JW's used a Protestant Bible the KJV, why would they use it if the Protestants had 'no clue' very strange.....

[Molearner]

Originally Posted by keiw1

And the major problem with that scenario is that not a single branch off her fixed much of the problems because they( religion that came out of Rome) translated errors in to fit false council teachings, misleading billions. The protestants had no clue when they translated. Info was not readily available so easy back then.

The greater problem is putting inordinate emphasis on scripture itself. It becomes an obsession with literal understanding which in turn is dependent on validating translations….a process doomed to failure.

It is better to remember the words of Jesus from John 5:39-40…”You diligently study the Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life. These are the Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life.”

In other words you must become spiritual. There is a huge chasm separating the spiritual from the theological.