Spiritual Forums

Home


Donate!


Articles


CHAT!


Shop


 
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.

We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.

Go Back   Spiritual Forums > Religions & Faiths > Taoism

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-01-2011, 05:27 AM
windwhistle
Posts: n/a
 
Taoism and Buddhism

What is the main philosophical difference between these two paths?

I know Buddhism acknowledges pain and how to extinguish it...where Taoism is more about opposites follow each other...you can't have one without the other...and everything that is light has a bit of darkness in it and vice versa.

Taoism is going with the flow and Buddhism is acceptance of pain to get rid of it.

They both talk of letting go. I can't understand Buddhism when I read about it. It seems way too intellectual for me to grasp. And I'm tired of trying so hard.
But does Taoism have enough meat on its bones to use as practical every day wisdom to live by?

What's the Western equivalent to Taoism, I wonder...maybe I'll try that! Especially if women are important too. How come all the great saints, saviors, enlightened beings are always men?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-01-2011, 06:26 AM
Lamby
Posts: n/a
 
Hi Windwhistle,

Good questions. Have you read from the site religioustolerance.org? On this page, they have links to the major world religions. Click on Taoism/Daoism, Buddhism, and you may also wish to read up on Confucianism.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/var_rel.htm

From what I understand, there often wasn't a distinct line drawn for natives - meaning they didn't refer to themselves strictly as Buddhist, Taoist, or what-have-you. Locals often crossed, mixed and matched, between their local religious traditions and other teachings. In Japan, for example, one person may practice all three: Buddhism, Taoism, and Shinto. So don't feel too bad if you can't quite sort your own feelings out. It isn't easy - and may not be entirely necessary. Sometimes these aren't referred to as "religions" but more a way of life.



------------------

Also, within Buddhism, there are as many differences between the types of Buddhists as there are differences between the types of Christians. These buddhists share the same core, but the differences can still be surprising.

If I remember correctly, there are three main divisions: (quoting another source - not my opinions here)

Theravada Buddhism
Quote:
this is the first and the southern Buddhism that the word comes from pali language which means that “the Doctrine of the Elders”. Their biggest aim is to use the meditation to train mind, and to encourage freedom of the mind from suffering. This kind or freedom suffering will allow you to reach the greatest spiritual goal the Nirvana. Theravada Buddhism is the only surviving school from the earliest years of Buddhism.

Mahayana Buddhism
Quote:
This is Buddhism in eastern Buddhism. This section only teaches the Pali Canon, this is the religious text in Theravada Buddhism but it also includes additional texts beliefs. This type of Buddhism believes that the person must practice universal compassion, and that is the altruistic quest of the Bodhisattva to attain the “Awakened Mind” of Buddha hood. This has also the level of mysticism involved.

Tibetan Buddhism
Quote:
This is the third type of Buddhism that was located in the Northern. This type of Buddhism is also considered to be a type of Mahayana Buddhism, but this was also embraces other teachings, texts, and practices that some are not seen in the eastern type. This is also sometimes called Tantric Buddhism or Vajrayana and this was uses both Mahayana and Theraveda scriptures.

---------
Quote:
How come all the great saints, saviors, enlightened beings are always men?

At risk of upsetting some, I believe it isn't that there were no women of importance who were spiritually significant, but that possibly (depending upon which religion you're looking at) there may have been info "left out" about important women by various human authorities who did the editing and disseminating of information. I sure hope this doesn't get me flamed, but I believe women were and are just as vital spiritually as men. By the way, google about Archangel Gabriel - you may find Gabriel has been sometimes thought to be female, but more often interpreted and referred to as male.

Hope this is of some help.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-01-2011, 04:28 PM
windwhistle
Posts: n/a
 
Lamby wrote, "So don't feel too bad if you can't quite sort your own feelings out. It isn't easy - and may not be entirely necessary."

This is the same conclusion I came up with his morning. I always try to fit into the safety of a particular path, yet they all come up lacking at some point. This leaves me feeling adrift. If I can accept the independence, or aloneness of being adrift and borrow parts from all paths that seem truthful to me I think I could feel contentment. It's letting go again...always it seems to be discarding beliefs, opinions, theories, other's truths and experiences, books of wisdom, knowledge...all these things are blocks yet they seem to be part of the journey.

My husband says I should start a church and be a minister there...he says it would be called,"The Church of The Confused!"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-05-2021, 03:15 PM
Hologram8 Hologram8 is offline
Ascender
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Spirit world
Posts: 912
  Hologram8's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by windwhistle
What is the main philosophical difference between these two paths?


I don't really get caught up in a lot of details ~

I am eclectic ~ I take what I find useful and discard the rest ~

I steer clear of cults and dogma ~
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-05-2021, 09:54 PM
django django is offline
Master
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,485
  django's Avatar
I find Buddhism way to intellectual as well, my mind turns off whenever I start to read what I should do. I don’t agree with the Buddha’s concept anyway, I don’t agree that emotions are illusory, and that the solution to emotional pain is to distance oneself from it. I accidentally came across the fire sermon the other day, where the Buddha preaches about achieving liberation from suffering through detachment from the five senses and mind. Way too much detachment for my liking in Buddhism, for me I am my mind, and my emotions, and my higher self, I’m all of it, and don’t have to detach from any of myself.

Taoism seems to like detachment as well, “sit and forget”, don’t get emotional about anything, emotions are poison, calm them and calm the mind, it’s all so restrictive.

Sometimes I think imagine teaching these methods to kids, tell them their joy is a poison, and to calm down, it’s so obviously wrong, yet as an adult we’re meant to do this.

They’re both approaches that can’t entertain the reality of emotions, that devalue them, and seek to detach from them, as well as the mental. Bonkers :)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2021, 07:18 PM
lostsoul13 lostsoul13 is offline
Master
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,625
  lostsoul13's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by django
I find Buddhism way to intellectual as well, my mind turns off whenever I start to read what I should do. I don’t agree with the Buddha’s concept anyway, I don’t agree that emotions are illusory, and that the solution to emotional pain is to distance oneself from it. I accidentally came across the fire sermon the other day, where the Buddha preaches about achieving liberation from suffering through detachment from the five senses and mind. Way too much detachment for my liking in Buddhism, for me I am my mind, and my emotions, and my higher self, I’m all of it, and don’t have to detach from any of myself.

Taoism seems to like detachment as well, “sit and forget”, don’t get emotional about anything, emotions are poison, calm them and calm the mind, it’s all so restrictive.

Sometimes I think imagine teaching these methods to kids, tell them their joy is a poison, and to calm down, it’s so obviously wrong, yet as an adult we’re meant to do this.

They’re both approaches that can’t entertain the reality of emotions, that devalue them, and seek to detach from them, as well as the mental. Bonkers :)

Really enjoyed your post —- detachment is hard to ‘stone and gather’ I wonder how detachment is just “sweeping it under -the -rug... but I agree some detachment is needed to use this valuable tool where it gives you eyes...belief is similar—-
__________________
Vampire speed..

Arabic first language (English)—- bear with me and please be patient)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2021, 02:24 AM
ayar415 ayar415 is offline
Master
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 1,099
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostsoul13
Really enjoyed your post —- detachment is hard to ‘stone and gather’ I wonder how detachment is just “sweeping it under -the -rug... but I agree some detachment is needed to use this valuable tool where it gives you eyes...belief is similar—-

Django may be correct about Buddhism being too intellectual.

According to scholars in western academia, nobody really knows what the Buddha taught. Archaeological findings have uncovered no scriptural records of the direct teachings of the Buddha. Apparently, the Noble Eight-fold path was the work of monks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-06-2021, 07:59 AM
AbodhiSky
Posts: n/a
 
Zen Buddhism seems the closest to Taoism to me. Both don't focus on scripture so much to me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-06-2021, 03:49 PM
ayar415 ayar415 is offline
Master
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 1,099
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbodhiSky
Zen Buddhism seems the closest to Taoism to me. Both don't focus on scripture so much to me.

Without scripture, there would be nothing to think about. It all boils down to living a life we have issues with. Why don't we grapple with those issues instead of looking for a way out?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums