Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
08-04-2021, 07:05 AM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 15,656
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallingLeaves
so why is it that you can't ignore the word insist and just believe everything is in constant flux and flexibility? IOW why do you have to be so insistent that we don't use the word insist?
|
Pointing something out is not insisting
|
08-04-2021, 04:36 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sky123
It depends entirely
|
not on "you" or the other as we all determine our own truth. so it would depend on "me" or "i"
it being truth. any statement can be determined to be true or false by the reader of it. but it is their truth only and not reflective of reality at all. we create our own self enclosed potentially delusional perception there. especially if we infer our truths and perceptions and reality is shared by another. interpretation is a labyrinth of delusion.
|
08-04-2021, 04:38 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,268
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustBe
If you understand all things (including your own self) as a state of flux, then why would you see the speaker who insists any differently?
|
Well, you do know the Buddhist teaching about impermanence, and how meditation practices can also be used to try and create a permanent state of equanimity as a refuge from suffering.
You have done your mindfulness practice – no?
If you did – at which point did you realize it wasn’t the all and end all of meditational practices?
And if you did see it as not being the all and end all of practices, how could you then insist everyone should follow your train of thought about your mindfulness process – as if it was the whole truth?
Not saying mindfulness isn’t a good practice.
*
|
08-04-2021, 05:26 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gem
From my perspective there is complete absence of any actual disagreement but the tendency still plays out in a semantic way over the use of a word.
|
yes true. the disagreement or conflict is invented in the mind of the reader or "interpreter" i'd say there are universal truths though but even there, the reader usually mucks them up
|
08-04-2021, 07:05 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 15,656
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbodhiSky
yes true. the disagreement or conflict is invented in the mind of the reader or "interpreter" i'd say there are universal truths though but even there, the reader usually mucks them up
|
It works both ways
|
08-04-2021, 07:08 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,268
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gem
From my perspective there is complete absence of any actual disagreement but the tendency still plays out in a semantic way over the use of a word.
|
A good job for mindfulness that is.
To go beyond those, “advise – insist” words and observe.
To go beyond good and ill-will (of the perceived 'audience') and/or whether we are even ‘right’ or not.
With mindfulness meditation, we may gain back our ‘free and independent will’ (from our obsessive, compulsive patterns, disturbing emotions, whatnot), but what then … what do we do with this 'free and independent will'?
*
|
08-04-2021, 07:09 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 15,656
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentient
Well, you do know the Buddhist teaching about impermanence, and how meditation practices can also be used to try and create a permanent state of equanimity as a refuge from suffering.
You have done your mindfulness practice – no?
If you did – at which point did you realize it wasn’t the all and end all of meditational practices?
And if you did see it as not being the all and end all of practices, how could you then insist everyone should follow your train of thought about your mindfulness process – as if it was the whole truth?
Not saying mindfulness isn’t a good practice.
*
|
Good insightful Post Sentient....
|
08-04-2021, 08:37 PM
|
|
"there is complete absence of any actual disagreement" one can be aware of that or not
|
08-04-2021, 08:40 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sky123
It works both ways
|
not at all. intent is wholly different and one is not imagining something that is not there, as it cannot be known due to a lack of shared understanding and perception. conflict of ideas can only exist in the mind which are then projected externally
|
08-04-2021, 08:48 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 15,656
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbodhiSky
not at all. intent is wholly different and one is not imagining something that is not there, as it cannot be known due to a lack of shared understanding and perception
|
You can imagine anything you want , there or not there try it for yourself
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29 PM.
|