Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
05-08-2012, 05:24 PM
|
|
Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 6,575
|
|
|
 |
|
What does one do with all of this when considering both that, since Hubble... we have a confirmed understanding of millions of Galaxies in space, and billions of Suns in them, and, with respect to possible situations of life...
And, also, that Physics, since Einsten, is telling us that reality is an illusion? That,
" Time and space are modes in which we think, and not conditions in which we live."? (Einstein)
A ten minute consensus at YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRkDicwjRQs&NR=1&feature=endscreen
__________________
"I believe there are two sides to the phenomena known as death. This side where we live, and the other side, where we shall continue to live.
Eternity does not start with death.
We are in eternity now." - Norman Vincent Peale
"There is no place in this new kind of physics for both the field and matter, for the field is the only reality." - A. Einstein
|
05-08-2012, 05:47 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Morpheus
What does one do with all of this when considering both that, since Hubble... we have a confirmed understanding of millions of Galaxies in space, and billions of Suns in them, and, with respect to possible situations of life...
|
What science fails to consider, is that intelligent life doesn't require bodies like ours, or earth like situations to thrive.
|
05-08-2012, 10:07 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
What science fails to consider, is that intelligent life doesn't require bodies like ours, or earth like situations to thrive.
|
Science more than considers this. |
06-08-2012, 05:27 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lulu
Science more than considers this.
|
It seems the phrase "capable of supporting life" always is mentioned when discussing possible locations of ET life, by astronomers I've seen interviewed.
And they're not talking about silicon based life I'm sure.
Share what you know please, if this is no longer true.
Scientists can speculate most anything, but what is the opinion-view shared with the public?
No doubt theoreticians have considered multidimensional lifeforms but mainstream science doesn't seem very vocal on this as far as the public is concerned.
(Those who look to science for truth.)
I'm not attacking science but asking for updated information that's been shared with the public by mainstream scientists.
Those who rely on grants , funding and aren't on the edge, lecturing, like Greg Braden.
Every scientist, astronomer I've heard , talked about "inhabitable planets." when discussing "alien" life
They are the ones that seem to form public opinion. |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 PM.
|
