Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
19-01-2012, 01:58 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
It don't make him right and it isn't relevant to this forum or topic.....
And I like to speak for myself - not use the words of others.
|
I find and use truth where'er it may appear, and in this case I happen to agree with Mr. Hughes. I don't like -isms. I very deliberately didn't use the word "spiritualism" because the -ism implies a set structure, a universal framework which I don't think exists. Spirituality, the experience, is what's important, not any one person's rules that they build around their experiences. You make rules, you attract people who don't like to think for themselves, and you end up with situations like what the OP is decrying. Thus the relevance of my choice of words.
CS
|
19-01-2012, 02:38 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuriousSnowflake
I find and use truth where'er it may appear, and in this case I happen to agree with Mr. Hughes. I don't like -isms. I very deliberately didn't use the word "spiritualism" because the -ism implies a set structure, a universal framework which I don't think exists. Spirituality, the experience, is what's important, not any one person's rules that they build around their experiences. You make rules, you attract people who don't like to think for themselves, and you end up with situations like what the OP is decrying. Thus the relevance of my choice of words.
CS
|
The truth as you believe it to be, your 'personal truth'.... It's not a universal one, the only real test of truth.
You have avoided using the term 'Spiritualism' (capital S to denote the religion and philosophy of Modern Spiritualism) for your personal prejudices but in a forum set up for its discussion, and in a thread entitled "Is Spiritualism all it's made out to be" that's somewhat incongruous....
You say spirituality, the experience, is what's important etc. but what you're really saying is that it's what's important to you personally. Again it's not a universal truth, the only truth, it's simply your values you're espousing and they're not Spiritualism.
Despite your belief, Spiritualism (not flexibly defined spirituality) does haves a firm structure although I wouldn't call it a "universal framework". It's a very simple structure fundamentally although it can readily be expanded, should one wish, to gain a deeper, broader understanding of what life - and death - is about.
And in doing that it's not down to having any 'personal truth' because it applies to all and anyone - the acid test, the universality, of 'truth'.
|
19-01-2012, 02:43 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by psychoslice
There your games not mine, I have no use for them, happy playing, yea yea.
|
They're not games at all, not games in the way you're pretending they are, but of course you know that already.... Some members might think you don't....
You're the negative to anything positive - and that's OK - there's balance in all matters
|
19-01-2012, 02:51 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
there are some great spiritualists out there now
there are great physical mediums, healers and mental mediums
there are fine ministers as well but there'll never be another emma britten or gordon higginson...
|
As I was saying to Enya, the field of mediumship as it's been known for decades, may not be the way of any future movement....
It's all too easy to look to the past, to mediums of the present, and assume that they are the future, that mediumship will be the same as we've known it.
Not for the first time I'll say that my personal belief (and I rarely express personal belief!) is that Modern Spiritualism has run its course. In the future there will be something different, maybe vastly different.
The truth can't ever change but the way it gets presented can - and probably will.
|
19-01-2012, 04:44 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
If I had to make a guess I'd say there won't be the same use of mediums and that any new generation of them will have different roles, focusing less on personal, evidential work and more on the conveyance of general information about our survival beyond corporeal death.
|
I agree, this is far more likely, being a sharing of knowledge and insight directly from Spirit and going beyond the need for evidence, although I think there will always be some working in that field.
|
19-01-2012, 05:08 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsea
You feel it too,G?
|
Most certainly J. Sommat's going on. The wheel has almost gone full circle. And it's going to go around again.
G
|
19-01-2012, 06:49 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enya
I agree, this is far more likely, being a sharing of knowledge and insight directly from Spirit and going beyond the need for evidence, although I think there will always be some working in that field.
|
Evidential mediumship is a feature of Modern Spiritualism - it provides those who receive it with the evidence that life goes on. It's the bedrock of Spiritualist philosophy. A major concern when mediumship is at a low ebb.
But communication from discarnates to incarnates has probably happened in one form or another since humankind began to articulate its thoughts through language - maybe even before then. Quite whether that was in the form of evidential mediumship we can't know.
Whatever the outcome in the future it's probably not going to be called Spiritualism and I wouldn't mind that in the least. The word has too many negative connotations now anyway and a new name would be a good thing - even though the truth can never be any different - only the way it's presented... .
|
19-01-2012, 09:20 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenos
Most certainly J. Sommat's going on. The wheel has almost gone full circle. And it's going to go around again.
G
|
Atmosphere,G?
Disasters?
Earthquakes?
Though I don't feel it is anything to with our planet.
Just a general uneasiness.
J.
|
19-01-2012, 10:09 PM
|
Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 11,462
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
They're not games at all, not games in the way you're pretending they are, but of course you know that already.... Some members might think you don't....
You're the negative to anything positive - and that's OK - there's balance in all matters
|
Don't be childish, I'm not saying your games are right or wrong, just saying there games, like all else here in this so called human life, what I say and do is my game, can't you admit that, what are you trying to hide, you try to make out that you know everything about spirituality, but you don't, can you abmit that?.
__________________
A belief system is nothing but poison to your capacity to understand. Good words are used to hide ugly things. – Osho
|
19-01-2012, 10:48 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepsea
Atmosphere,G?
Disasters?
Earthquakes?
Though I don't feel it is anything to with our planet.
Just a general uneasiness.
J.
|
Not negative J. Absolutely positive.
G
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 AM.
|