Thread: Oneness
View Single Post
  #24  
Old 05-07-2020, 09:12 PM
AaronStar AaronStar is offline
Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 93
  AaronStar's Avatar
Ah, I know what you mean.
This makes me dependant, It's true.
But the question is: when you are lovesick, and you miss someone, isn't this the true definition of love?
It may be more enlightened to follow an individual path to God where you are self-sufficient but does this make you more loving?
I think it's a different inner programme that was embedded in us by the Creator - the independent ascension and the caring love.
I am the second type.
I would never fully change this innate nature. It always calls what it longs for. No matter what I try to do.
So I simply say - sometimes I wish we stick around more.
Otherwise why live? Always rush to somewhere? Why, when we are not together?
Temporary bonds are cool but are they true?
Can they be true love?
Maybe the trick is to love forever but to be able to be separated from the other significant part for a while.
Then you are more balanced.
That's the babying part you're talking about, I guess.
__________________
Nihil verum est licet omnia.
Reply With Quote