Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sky123
The anatta teaching is not a doctrine of no-self, but a not-self strategy for shedding suffering by letting go of its cause, leading to the highest, undying happiness. At that point, questions of self, no-self, and not-self fall aside. Once there's the experience of such total freedom, where would there be any concern about what's experiencing it, or whether or not it's a self?
This might help  |
That is not what anatta means. It is what split the Buddha from Hinduism.
Sunyata, no thing, no soul, no atman.