View Single Post
  #33  
Old 23-09-2020, 04:31 AM
janielee
Posts: n/a
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gem
It's not the teachings that concern me, and it's not like I imagine any teacher as a special person, so like everyone and anyone, I assess credibility on the degree of integrity a person demonstrates. If they profess to to a status based on Buddhism, then a basic adherence to sila principles is required, which excludes intoxication and sexual misconduct.


Chodron is Trungpa's protege and member of the sangha, which is good, because she seems to have some integrity, but she resigned her post as a teacher because they appointed a known rapist to the trust.




He can't walk the talk, so to me, it's a lot of empty words.




I can only suggest that if people want go to a school or get involved a the sangha, just make sure sila is the founding principle of the sangha.



At my school, emphasis is placed on mindful equanimity, so we try to be aware of our adverse/craven reactivity as it arises and minimise it as best we can.

To me a person is a person, and a teacher has a role which is respectable, but on what grounds is it respectable?

1) The teacher is giving all their time to the school for the benefit of the meditators expecting nothing in return. That's dana, and Generosity is respectable.

2) To be a teacher, your sila has to be impeccable and it takes many years to meet to meet the position's requirements. Such commitment is respectable.


Trungpas gets sex from his students and becomes rich from their kind donations - no dana. He gets intoxicated and perpetrates sexual misconduct - no Sila. His Trustees are degenerate and people get harmed in the school. No refuge.


Their respecrt is based on that delusion that he's a special enlightened person, and he took advantage of that. Their trust is misplaced and they take refuge where they are taken advantage of.






It's reliably documented - and that's only what was publically told. They were all up to mischief while he was alive, and after he died, and since they just appointed a rapist to the trust, it's reaonable to suspect something fishy is still going on today.




If you don't want people to get harmed, don't promote Trungpa.

I find the whole guru parade to be pretentious on the whole whole, but there are good sorts in the spiritual teacher trade. You just have be very discerning, and my tip is, ensure they are founded securely in principles of sila... (and if the trust re-appoints a rapist whom they know to the trust... well, screw that).



He can't walk the talk, so what he says is worthless. Chodron resigned because any reasonable person wouldn't stand for it.The rest of them support the rapist's appointment... so, I think maybe there might more than one sex fiend in the bunch?



I guess people who admire Trungpa's approach would have a hard time with mine which is ethically founded. You'd be safe enough in a school like mine (but still have to be very discerning). The students aren't sexed even if they wanted it, and because we run on dana, 100% of your donations will be utilised for the benefit of future meditators.

The tales of after Trungpa are indeed disturbing. We don't want that. No-one does.

Trungpa Rinpoche is a realized individual; no doubt about it, in my opinion.

I hear you though, Gem, I hear you. I would never encourage anyone to a school with harm at its core, no Dharma in its Light, no realization in its teacher.

I admire many Theravadan schools where the Buddha's Vinaya is the case, so of course I appreciate and respect sila. I learn from all genuine Buddhist teachers and schools - I only wish that there were more, Gem. The Buddha's Dharma is deep, and profound, full of Light and compassion in the deepest possible sense.

Blessings and thanks, deep thanks,

JL
Reply With Quote