[JustBe]

Originally Posted by God-Like

Hi Guy's ..

This seems to be the sticking point in many conversations regarding what you are that experiences life .

There are obviously many levels to what we are but fundamentally speaking from the premise that there is only what you are that can encompass all life as we know it .

All of creation as we know it .

Now what seems to be the case in non duality terms is that there is only ONE .

This is my eyes doesn't mean that there is only ONE Self in a way where ONENESS is one dimensional (excuse the pun).

One is the many and the many is one in this regard, that is why there can be individuality while still retaining fundamentally the sameness that is of all things .

Oneness put across in such a way where anything that relates to twoness must mean separation of oneness is incorrect in my eyes .

There is the incorrect understanding of oneness to begin with which creates a premise of there cannot be twoness .

I welcome your thoughts ...

(I didn't post this in the non duality section in order to captivate a larger audience and perspective).

Of course from a hard core non duality standing pointing there is no one here to have any thoughts on this and yet thoughts do come to the fore within awareness of your very self lol ..

Does anyone else find these type of statements bonkers?


x daz x

I buzz one millionioth..

That’s because I’m light years away..��

(At least your not still banging on the ‘not self, no self’ contradiction you had months back.. ooopsy, wait one sec! ‘You did mention it’ hehe)


No I don’t find them bonkers, BECAUSE I understand myself through experience of what the meaning and relationship in myself relates to it as more ‘directly’. If you haven’t ‘passed through’ that stream of awareness directly and your simply being yourself as you are and relate your own way, it doesn’t matter.

You may be understanding it differently in your own time and contradiction with it..


Everything we pass through and relate to defines itself and it’s own experience, sometimes people’s process and use of terminology, cannot be recognised through the logical brain, but rather it’s felt and known directly through experience. The descriptive nature arises through the ‘felt and known’ when one understands ‘directly from experience’. If you haven’t had a ‘direct experience, logic cannot rationalise what it is seeing, noticing and curious about. Intuition can read another’s experience and take aspects into more ‘felt and known’ understandings, but not all ‘T’s’ are intuitive..