Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Busby
Thanks for taking the trouble, now it's clear I do in fact know that.
But - I don't see any connection with the basic premise - namely that QP states quite clearly (although not understood) that in order for anything to exist an observer is needed.
That's why I've been puzzling over the existence of the BB.
|
God was the observer, or more appropriately Universal Consciousness?
But that's not even right because non-duality posits the witness can never witness itself, whether in the guise of Atman or Brahman, and if one does subscribe to non-duality there is nothing but Brahman. Existence is merely a dualistic expression of its non-duality.
For me I've come to the conclusion it's an exercise in futility attempting to intellectualize it, though it is fun.
