Quote:
Oh I would believe how many people will not give you an answer and there are probably any number of reasons for that. What people also don't realise is that beliefs are only a small part of their consciousness and there's been quite a bit of unconscious 'processing' that has gone on prior to them saying "I believe that...." What would probably be the most interesting of threads is one that asks the reasons people have beliefs. Beliefs are a very intimate part of some people, to others they're wealth and status and to others yet the bubble of an alter ego that's escaping and evading from the 'real world'. Some become as protective of their beliefs as those that are protective of material wealth - people own their beliefs and have invested quite a lot in them. The ego doesn't differentiate between what people won. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well, I can't think the planet would be worse off for that! :laugh: . |
Quote:
Without an ego we'd be in a world of hurt or others around us would. :biggrin: In the Freudian sense "the ego's job is to strike a balance between the two often competing forces and to make sure that fulfilling the needs of the id and superego conforms to the demands of reality". Without that balance we would either swing back and forth between extremes or get stuck at one extreme or the other. From a spiritual perspective my take is awareness can be a sanity-check with veto power over ego. Quote:
Yup. It's all an accumulation of experience over one's life and one approach to the spiritual path is to assess all the habits of mind and sort out the wheat from the chaff, so to speak. At least that's my current take. |
Quote:
Interesting this came up in this thread because this recently occurred to me in the context of the underlying non-duality, if one subscribes to such a philosophy. Imagine that non-duality, Brahman if you will, all by its lonesome with no playground to play out and experience its intelligence and creativity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's also almost always ignored is that if people don't have an ego, they are unable to function. Jung's simplest definition of 'ego' is "It is a sense of I am" and without that we'd be in a psychiatric ward, literally with no sense of "I am hungry" or "I need to pee." I wonder how that would change Spirituality if people took it on board. |
Quote:
This is a very limited and erroneous understanding of ego and egolessness. Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes it is, with the perseveration of these unfounded irrational distortions - “nappies” & forced feeding a major theme. These evident fixations probably originate in areas that become problematic to discuss on a public forum including Gs’s repeated autobiographical references in his own posts, which would tend to confirm this perspective, but out of respect and compassion we need not pursue that direction further. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums