Ha!

And here we have ''Akashic Records 101'':

https://www.gaia.com/article/akashic...kashic-records

There's another website with the ending "101"..... There's a lot to wade through on that website and I wonder if anyone here has actually tried what's suggested there? If so, how were they certain they'd accessed the actual records? How would you know?

I think we're losing focus - me included - and are again off topic. :icon_eek:

I have no idea what that is, or if there is such a thing.







Well, all I know is people identified the virus and have tried to find out where it came from. The best we can tell is it transmuted thought animals and became contagious to humans. It's happened before including bird flu, AIDS and other diseases, and that seems to have happened again with covid. It will also happen again with new illnesses in the future. Next time it happens there will be conspiracy theories all over again.

''Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety'' ~ Benjamin Franklin.

Let truthful words heal and strengthen you, and cast aside the fear.:hug3:

I would tell you of my understandings of its origins but as previously stated it was not well received as it challenged many peoples belief systems of what is and isn't true. How can you prove something that is difficult to show others that cannot see?

Proof is difficult but surely it doesn't mean it shouldn't be attempted if sound evidence can be presented?

The 'sound evidence' is dependant on what type of format it has to be in order for it to be credible. As evidence by one on a website can say one thing and another who has experienced it and explaining it verbally are two separate accounts. Just like if you were to believe in one system and someone else in another who has had the experience over the other. Then the latter would be questioned somewhat and the evidence still remains unsatisfactory. Only when all are aligned does any credible evidence emerge from any source be it form physical and non-physical forms become acceptable and 'sound evidence'.

The format of sound evidence is one where ideally there is more than a single source for the information. Ideas, thoughts, beliefs, hypotheses, theories are not necessarily sound evidence.

Even personal experiences that unshakeably persuade a single experiencer is still not evidence but the more people telling of similar experiences the more that information could be considered evidence - in my approach. For example my own speciality is afterlife but my personal experience is not evidence we survive the death of our bodies. But I can point to abundant evidence because so many other people have had similar experiences.

It's not proof but untold numbers consider it sound evidence.

That would be like someone pointing and saying I just saw God. Then those who question ask for proof. How would they prove that? When no other explanation or evidence can be given other than that of the individual's own experience and the knowledge obtained.