Suffering is caused by negative energy. We suffer because we have negative energy attachments. Being positive is the only way out. Healthy mind, healthy body. Easy. Amen
|
Quote:
I think I agree with you from a relative stand point, but isnt act of the surrendering a mere illusion also? and lastly who is doing the discovering? Just a question, im not trying to discredit your answer! would like to know if im missing something |
Quote:
The difficulty with this approach is that it renders all discussion pointless. If we regard surrender as an illusion then we also accept that you and I are illusions and the question is an illusion and this forum is an illusion and there is no-one present to ask or answer anything. There is the absolute approach which says all manifestation is an illusion, and then there is the relative approach which accepts that while it may all be an illusion, we still have to deal with manifestation on a practical level. And while we are in the worlds of form, we have to deal with form. So you may tell yourself that your car (if you have one) is an illusion, but you still fill it up with illusory petrol. You may say that your job (if you have one) is an illusion, but you still go out to work and do what is necessary to get your pay at the end of the month. Even Ramana Maharshi, who no doubt knew all about the illusory nature of form, still probably ate his illusory breakfast in the morning and visited his illusory bathroom, just like the rest of us. So saying that surrender is a mere illusion done by someone who is not actually present is fine if you have already realised the absolute. But if we are stuck in the relative then surrender is an actual event within the relative done by someone who is very much present. The mental concepts of Oneness and illusion are not the same as the realisation of Oneness and illusion. Peace |
surrender emptiness
Quote:
Points raised here are superb and very much helpful . Just to add to the points raised for more clarification , people at times fear the words like 'surrender' . Many a times people fill we surrender to someone with gun pointing to our head and we surrendering is something very dreadful situation and thereby they abhor the 'surrender' to God . So 'surrender' here means more 'devotion' with love to God just like lovers in a romantic situation let the lover play or parents playing with their little kids allowing kids even to kick or even slap the parent in the play. So the key word here is love / devotion. In Hinduism its called Bhakti (process of staying connected /associated with God ). We need to view the word 'surrender' in this light. Further many a times people dread the word emptiness . Above post rightly mentions emptiness is fullness . Just to stress this point further Emptiness is emptiness of material differences of manifestations and thereby resulting separation which realizes the fullness / wholeness of underlying common unifying factor . As long as there is life the duality and resulting separation is going to be there and there is no need for arbitrarily discarding those differences . The need is to increase our vision and ability to see the underlying commonality and act accordingly with love which pierces the veil of separation and creates joy for all in the play called life. This is gradual and evolutionary and possible only with continuity , persistence ,perseverance , intelligence , faith ,honesty and hardwork. |
Quote:
Thanks, HITESH SHAH. You are right - people may not like words such as surrender and emptiness, because in everyday life surrender has connotations of weakness and helplessness, while emptiness has connotations of something bleak and meaningless. Whereas on the spiritual journey surrender is the willingness to let go of that which is small and limited in order to experience a greater reality. And as you say, love is the key to surrender. And emptiness is that state without qualities which allows all things to be, which is our own nature. Peace |
emptiness / surrender
Quote:
|
Quote:
Going back to the question of who is doing the discovering, this is worth considering further. A common idea, especially in the Neo-Advaita community, is that there is no-one present, no-one to realise anything, and nothing to realise since we are already that state. The problem with this approach is that it denies the reality of peoples' everyday experience. For most people there is definitely someone present, and that someone does not live in a state of realisation. That someone may desire realisation, hence the popularity of Neo-Advaita which suggests that realisation is available to anyone and can happen at any moment. But the intellectual arguments which people repeat are nothing to do with actual realisation. So who is doing the discovering? We can consider a human as consciousness which may function on three separate levels.
Peace |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums