Is Channeling Erik Real or Fake?
 

Is Channeling Erik real or fake? Is he really a ""dead" guy? Of mediums and psychics, there are almost certainly way more fakes than the genuine article. A huge mount of "chaff" to sort through, to find grains of truth.

My impression is, he's real. For one thing, so much of what he says is so surprising. Fakes tend not to be so specific, and to say the boilerplate concepts that people expect. Erik is specific, and "non-standard."

JoeColo:smile:

I'll study him today as I've nothing else to do,:biggrin: .I personally swear by the channelings of Seth. The main reason being I can remember my birth and Seth describes it perfectly.

I've just watched 1 video so far, it seems genuine to me but it is for you to decide.:smile:

To give you some perspective on the answer to "Is Channeling Erik Real or Fake?" ...


Channeling is more common than people think, and it can be done by almost anybody who's willing to pot the time and focus, and who understands its basics.

All channeling is distorted to some degree by the channel's beliefs and expectations. Then the reader / spectator distorts it further through their own beliefs. To minimize distortions, you have to put aside ALL your beliefs and expectations when you channel or read it, to approach the information intuitively (not intellectually, nor emotionally), and even then, you can't eliminate distortions 100%.

The Seth material is the best channeling material I am aware of, but it is massive, and you have to approach it properly. There are many people who read it, but few (as far as I know) who penetrated its deeper meanings. Most Seth fans treat the material as a gospel, and / or filter it (unconsciously) and draw distorted conclusions.

Recently, I got exposed to the work of two Italian academics, part of that work being contacting non-physical entities through channeling (assisted obe).

I recommend their website evenlab.org, and their report:

'Contents of dialogues with "Him"'. "Him" is an entity they contacted who answered a lot of specific questions. It is a document very dense in information (70 pages).

https://figshare.com/ndownloader/files/24128846

I recall browsing the Erik book (books ?) but don't recall much. It has some information that I think to be accurate, and some that is distorted. I wouldn't call it "fake", because that has the implication that the author intentionally tried to mislead, and I think he didn't mean to do that.

From post #4
 

(I found Erik to be a nice kid.) :)

https://figshare.com/ndownloader/files/24128846
The link, Download, before this post-
This was said so well and simply.
I'm talking with some people that are always in some sort of turmoil for decades...so it stood out.

Around page 28 ?:

''In human reality the degree of mental turmoil is an indication of the level of awareness:
the less turmoil – the greater the control over mental turmoil –
the greater the awareness.''

Thanks for that recommendation inavalan,I'll take a look later. Unfortunately it's another day here in the UK and I'm busy again but when I have time I'll look at it.:smile:

This is facinating, thank you!

<3

Mediums and psychics in general have so often been totally fake, that many people think they all are fake. Some say Erik is fake. imo, Seth is the most "proven" channeled personality. I've seen videos of him speaking through Jane Roberts, and I don't think anyone could ever come close to faking his voice, mannerisms, and the content of what he's saying. imo, Erik is real.

JoeColo:smile:

It's so unfair to talk in such a way about mediums being fakes when it's actually deceivers who are frauds, fakes and manipulators. Mediums are not fakes; they provide an invaluable service as a communication bridge between this world and that of the spirit.

The ones who pretend to be mediums are the fakes.

Erik is an interesting story which needs to be properly understood.

I would have to echo what Boyce has said


Namaste