Quote:
|
Amilius777--The soul incarnate in a body is paradoxical. If that is true, which I believe, that means there is entirely other part of my Self that is beyond the body, yet my activity in the body feels like that is all there is.
|
Amillus, we can presume that, there are kinds of relationships to your
biological/soul body that we are not aware of involving
gravity, EMRadiation{
photons }, and others.
Just because were not aware of them does not mean that we have to assign the term "soul" to any one of them, as your comment above indirectly infer/imply or suggest.
If I were to pick out and individual
fermionic matter or
bosonic force to individually assign to the term soul, then I would have to use the term
gravity aka mass-attraction. imho
Biological/soul does not have a soul within,
biological/soul as a whole entity is a
soul/biological. imho
Quote:
|
Spirit manifesting in matter, manifested as matter works this way because that is the level of vibration It is at. We call it the Law of Evolution.
|
Here also, I would assign the word "
spirit" with physical/energy ergo
fermionic matter and
bosonic forces as well as;
the
metaphysical-1 aspect of "
spirit" as
spirit-of-intention via our access to
mind/intellect.
Quote:
|
The only thing that appears to be strange is the big bang.
|
I think that depends only exactly how we define what exactly the alledged big bang was. Ask 100 people to define the big bang with 6 pages of details, and I think you would get at least 50 variations of what exactly a big bang might entail.
Quote:
|
If there is anything that was an act of God it would be the First Cause. The First Cause behind anything is God or the Father-Parent Force.
|
To be clear, your parents are the initiating set of circumstances for our individual existence, but they had parents also, so on an so on.
Quote:
|
The first Cause behind the universe, the first cause behind homosapien appearance, the first Cause behind any interventions or what have you. It comes from the Causeless One.
|
I believe the Universe exists without a reason for its existence other that, there may have been as initial set of circumstances, within a finite
Universe, that, in
Multiverse terms--- the parent
Universe --- produces our specific local bubble universe.
Our finite, occupied space Universe--- or conceptualized as a finite, occupied space
Multiverse ----is eternally existent. imho I.e. there is no first cause for any local aspect of any part of the
Universe, or as
Multiverse, only inititating set of circumstances, withing context of eternally existent greater and wholistic, finite, occupied space,
Universe. imho
I.e. there is not first cause for eternal existence of our finite, occupied space
Universe and since it exists eternally-- in whatever changing/fluctuating transformations ---it is inherently rational, logical and common sensical to understand, comprehend and believe that, there is no first cause. imho
Quote:
|
See? I don't understand how Religion and Science could possibly be at war with each other. Makes no sense unless you are a Creationist or an Intelligent Designer.
|
I see what I state above and have elaborated upon it much in other threads
"
U"niverse >
Universe > universe{s} >
I-verse < you-verse < we-verse < them-verse
Humans apply a reason for the existence of
Universe.
Universe does not apply a reason for its eternal existence.
Human
conceptualize a finite, occupied space
Universe, and then conceptually place themselves outside of the
conceptualized Universe, as if they were a
God{ ess } holding the whole finite
Universe in their
conceptualized God{ ess } hands.
r6
HUmans Apply a Reason For Existence of Finite Universe
Linear Mode
