Thoughts on Creating new Sub-threads

[Ariaecheflame]

If this was a group which was in the physical... there would be a very natural split off as that is what would serve peoples individual and the communities needs.

It need not be done in a segregated way - it can be inclusive.

And there does not need to be 100 branches of this tree
Two sections only...a section for those who want - need help navigating the energetic components of this path and the general section for those navigating the initiation into TFs...

It seems in my experience that the vast majority of the path is energetic... and there are some very specific energetics I'd like to be able to discuss in depth... which I had no inclination about the first 2 years into this path.
And frankly some which would just confuse me and intimidate me In the beginning!

If I knew about the lightworking aspects of this path at the beginning I would have run even further even faster from it haha...
That's especially true once I started getting into the gridwork... and collective twinsoul 3rd energy stuff... that stuff would have totally put me off!
It would be really wonderful to have a safe place to discuss all that stuff... and could prove to be very productive as well... in the lightworker realms of joining forces... which I know alot of us have experienced in dreamscape interdimensionally ect.
And no... we do not fit into the general lightworker section either as this is a specific type of dynamic... we are ostracized in pretty much every spiritual group. It reminds me of my experience coming out as bisexual than later pansexual and being ostracized by both the straight community and the gay community...(that was my experience as a teenager all those years ago hahaha).

[ForgedInFire]

Atleast into 3 sections. Soulmates topics do seem to go noticeably neglected so they really should have their own place. Then a noob tf section.. those who are still obsessional about everything..except doing the work. Then a section for us who are all focused on the work focus and not on the "twin flame"

Yeh some false lights dont want it divided up as its now all in one convenient place to seek for victims to attack on. Yea ive seen a few of those come around here before.

Honestly this forum should not even be accessible to the public via google and no account on here. Thats one reason why i will never share more private details here nor post as much anymore.

Originally Posted by ForgedInFire

Atleast into 3 sections. Soulmates topics do seem to go noticeably neglected so they really should have their own place. Then a noob tf section.. those who are still obsessional about everything..except doing the work. Then a section for us who are all focused on the work focus and not on the "twin flame"

Yeh some false lights dont want it divided up as its now all in one convenient place to seek for victims to attack on. Yea ive seen a few of those come around here before.

Eh? I don't know quite what you mean by "false lights". If you mean those who question some of the hypotheses or who want to offer support for those dashed by disappointment, would it be any different
with 3 or even 100 sections? I haven't encountered many posts actually attacking victims, they're very rare. Using that criteria you'd close the forum. Some other sections are far more volatile than this one. .

One value of including soul mates in this section is comparative. People do ask, so how would that work with segregation? Would it lead to dialogue on "where should I go to talk about this?"

Honestly this forum should not even be accessible to the public via google and no account on here. Thats one reason why i will never share more private details here nor post as much anymore.

Were it not such popular click-bait one wonders of the value of this section at all. There are specialist fora elsewhere for the subject. But do they allow the newcomer or confused person, so easily abused and rebuffed on those fora I'm told, a chance to enquire or discuss their situation without restraint? As an enquirer I was confronted with a barrage of complaint, I suppose because asking questions can be interpreted as dissent by sensitive folk. If nothing else this section allows a mix of spiritual and non-spiritual discussion about relationships that people think concern this doctrinaire.

It is a forum. That has to be remembered. Some posters are inclined to discuss. My first post on this topic was taken up by the o/p which is fine by me.

[Ciona]

Okay, I've received word from the mods that they have not moderated anything in here, so I'm going to give this another try and reword it. Hopefully this time I can keep me and the Universe from getting tangled up in a massive epic jumble of not happenings.

Originally Posted by Inika

along lines of development level rather than object of affection titles.

that is how i am understand the purpose of the poll for an idea.

and again it wouldnt be restricted to anyone.

if you want to chime on and on about a person. go to a object of affection title thread (TF/SM)

if you want to chime on and on about romance, love relationships. go to the love and relationships threads.

If you want to chime on and on about personal developments after a sig catylyst, the idea here would be not be such a bad one.

For starters, I was saying that I think this post of Inika's makes a lot of sense in some ways.

It was said with the disclaimer that I voted, ‘I would like to see some changes but not sure what.’

I also backed her idea of Love & Romance (I would also add divine friendship to this, or soul sister/brother bonds. Anyway, something having to do with divine love.) having its own section. The reason why is because the reaction of the Emotional Body due to these heart center activations is extremely intense. It can take quite a while to sort all that out. Another reason is because sometimes the connection really is going both ways, or it’s divinely orchestrated (not that one-sided connections can't be divinely orchestrated as well, lol whew!)…feelings aren’t everything, but they do have their place in the journey.

I then presented my idea of what I would personally really like to see, which is a sub-forum entitled: Self-Realization & Integration, which I detailed in my other post up above.

The other idea I had was a Belief Systems & Theories section. Everyone has the right to ask questions and do research. This would also be the place for dissenters/questioners, or people who wish to explore various philosophies and the various twin flame theories and models. It would NOT be a place to debate or pick on people, but a place for intelligent discussion as per the forum rules. It would give people an outlet for this, which seems to be needed. If a vulnerable newbie, still dealing with the shock and awe of what’s happening to them spiritually and trying to figure it out, chooses to come into this section and explore, at least they will know what they are potentially opening themselves up to. Otherwise, they can just ask questions in the general section or other sections, where constantly dissenting would NOT be appropriate to the topics at hand.

This is the Soul Mates & Twin Flames section of SF, after all. It should be treated as such and respected.

And along those lines…

I also agree with ForgedInFire’s point about Soul Mates. They really do get neglected around here. Soul-to-soul connections and divine partnerships are the future.

[Inika]

really really loving the ideas of supporting the development!


I know this is not a question directed at me to answer, yet i'd like to give MO on its definition.

Eh? I don't know quite what you mean by "false lights". If you mean those who question some of the hypotheses or who want to offer support for those dashed by disappointment, would it be any different
with 3 or even 100 sections?

those to me are not deemed a false light. I'm seeing the false light needing props outside of self to gain that light. manipulate, con, making financial profit, encouraging obbsessive, focus only on physical person, and use techniques on other person to convert to your way.
There is some different energies here and all over the world. Discernment is a given in your journey.

I for one, welcome your posts Lorelyn. You can give some good direction.

[lunapixie]

Wow! Split decision! 33.33%, 33.33%, and, you guessed it, 33.33%.

I voted no because I believe that we grow faster when we grow together. Together is always better. I like that it’s all a bit messy and chaotic here sometimes. That’s the beauty of inclusiveness. Let’s include everyone and everyone’s ideas and thoughts and let’s dance!

We’ve all disagreed with different users at different times on here, but that’s a part of growing and evolving. I haven’t read everyone’s responses yet but those percentages up there speak louder than anything else :)

[Ciona]

Originally Posted by lunapixie

I voted no because I believe that we grow faster when we grow together. Together is always better. I like that it’s all a bit messy and chaotic here sometimes. That’s the beauty of inclusiveness. Let’s include everyone and everyone’s ideas and thoughts and let’s dance!

We'd still be together. But consider this analogy...

Sometimes when you have too many plants growing together in the exact same space, they suffer and struggle and don't grow as well as they could. Sometimes they need to be spaced out a little in the soil, especially as they start getting bigger, so they can have a little more air to breathe, and room around them to spread their roots and get enough light and water.

A plant which is growing very well, who is bigger than the other plants and who sees the sun, might not even notice a smaller plant sitting in its shadow, struggling.

Or maybe that other little plant looks at that crowded garden and thinks, No way, no thanks! I'm sure as hell not going in there to play! Or maybe they lurk and just don't speak up, ask questions or say anything because they are too afraid to.

A well maintained garden which has had a lot of growth, sometimes needs thinned out, or have some plants moved around to meet all the needs of the garden. It's still all the same garden, though.

Having said that, and despite my list of ideas/suggestions, I also agree with emeraldheart that we don't want or need 100 branches on the tree.

[psychegrl]

Originally Posted by Sister Moon

We'd still be together. But consider this analogy...

Sometimes when you have too many plants growing together in the exact same space, they suffer and struggle and don't grow as well as they could. Sometimes they need to be spaced out a little in the soil, especially as they start getting bigger, so they can have a little more air to breathe, and room around them to spread their roots and get enough light and water.

A plant which is growing very well, who is bigger than the other plants and who sees the sun, might not even notice a smaller plant sitting in its shadow, struggling.

Or maybe that other little plant looks at that crowded garden and thinks, No way, no thanks! I'm sure as hell not going in there to play! Or maybe they lurk and just don't speak up, ask questions or say anything because they are too afraid to.

A well maintained garden which has had a lot of growth, sometimes needs thinned out, or have some plants moved around to meet all the needs of the garden. It's still all the same garden, though.

Having said that, and despite my list of ideas/suggestions, I also agree with emeraldheart that we don't want or need 100 branches on the tree.

Great analogy! I was actually going to post something similar but decided against it. I was thinking more about not all life is equal such as the ivy vine destroying trees by feeding off of them. This speaks completely in line with ideas that are destructive to growth since not all growth is productive growth. Not all ideas, positive or otherwise, contribute to the goal of a thread and can do more harm.

I'm fact, there are times when acceptance of all ideas is destructive to the point of harm. Take the general acceptance of harassing women as a type of normalcy where it occurred and people knew but did nothing. This kind of acceptance has been incredibly disempowering for thousands of years. Not until the majority of voices spoke as one did any real energy shift.

It's this "there's no wrong way" dispersion of focus attitude that has lost momentum on some powerful shifts and confused people from there path. Discernment is necessary.

[aimtobe]

What do the two have in common? How are they different?

I've always thought of soul mates and twin flames as pretty different. But I'm not an expert on either.

[ForgedInFire]

Originally Posted by Lorelyen

Eh? I don't know quite what you mean by "false lights". If you mean those who question some of the hypotheses or who want to offer support for those dashed by disappointment, would it be any different
with 3 or even 100 sections? I haven't encountered many posts actually attacking victims, they're very rare. Using that criteria you'd close the forum. Some other sections are prone to volatility which the moderators watch.

No Lorelyen what i mean by that is those who "pretend" to help but are just actually insulting, invalidating, intentionally misleading or promoting continuation of detestable behaviors. I am not talking about people such as yourself who offer questioning. A great example of this would be recent things ive seen on the forum.. cheating but asking for support for it and with another member "oh ive had this with several people and some are forum members" then proceeding to say the other people who experienced things with ONE PERSON has mental issues. Who needs to deal with that?

As far as about the forum.. id prefer it that it would be restricted to members only.. You have to join to post and interact here..but all it takes is google and a link to be nosy without having to join to see anything. Why should that include person matters most are willing to share to many people? It shouldnt be that way but it is.