Our Loving Source is an Amazing Manifestor - Page 2

All-Is-Well · #11 03-07-2016, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn

And then you have Krishna in the Gita saying almost the same
thing as that refrigerator verse from the Old Testament...

Those that give Me their undivided devotion find Me easily.

A paraphrase...or '...easily attain Me."

Ahh...

yes, many similar verses to thy subject. :)

Miss Hepburn · #12 05-07-2016, 03:30 PM

Our Source is an amazing and brilliant creator.
I love that 'He'* so brilliantly placed that creative power
inside each one of us.

And isn't it so wonderful so many of us are spreading the word
that things do not just 'happen' to us...but, that we have
the power to change things..might take a week or two to
see the process unfolding...but keeping up the 'faith' it does happen.

I know someone that it took 6 months to get tons of $$
could you wait that long for something? LOL!

* He, Who has no gender.

Miss Hepburn · #13 02-02-2020, 04:07 AM

4 yrs ago. I don't even rem. this. But guthrio brought this up in Sp Development.
His first post is why I brought this back.

guthrio · #14 02-02-2020, 04:56 AM

Miss Hepburn,

Thanks for reviving this awesome contribution from Moretocome, just as relevant, timely, and inspirational as ever!

inavalan · #15 02-02-2020, 06:09 AM

I read / browsed what @moretocome posted here and on his website.

All that argumentation is in fact intended to confuse you, the reader, and put you in a light trance. It is a method used especially by NLP practitioners (Richard Bandler, and others). The trance is meant to establish a connection to your subconscious, so that it can get your wish / suggestion less distorted by all your other noise in your head. The content of the argumentation is formulated to also point you toward your inside, toward your subconscious.

Once this happened, the next step, the forgetting about your wish, and not thinking about how the suggestion should be fulfilled, is meant to stop you from sending to your subconscious weakening suggestions like doubts, or imposing counterproductive restrictions.

The final step of thanking is meant to pull you out of trance, and close the connection. This prevents further giving unintended suggestions to your subconscious.

One important recommendation that @moretocome missed is highlighted by his example of inheriting $500k from an uncle (who had to die in order for that money to become available). Subconscious doesn't have our moral sense of good / bad, or same sense of proportionality, so, it might choose a path to your wish fulfillment that causes collateral damage. That's why other proponents of positive thinking (e.g. Neville Goddard) recommend to embed or attach to your wish restrictions of safety and benefit to all those involved.

This should work.

lomax · #16 02-02-2020, 07:08 AM

Good post inavalan.

Miss Hepburn · #17 02-02-2020, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by inavalan

I read / browsed what @moretocome posted here and on his website.

All that argumentation is in fact intended to confuse you, the reader, and put you in a light trance.
It is a method used especially by NLP practitioners (Richard Bandler, and others).
The trance is meant to establish a connection to your subconscious, so that it can get
your wish / suggestion less distorted by all your other noise in your head.

The content of the argumentation is formulated to also point you toward your inside, toward your subconscious.
Once this happened, the next step, the forgetting about your wish, and not thinking about how
the suggestion should be fulfilled, is meant to stop you from sending to your subconscious weakening suggestions
like doubts, or imposing counterproductive restrictions.

The final step of thanking is meant to pull you out of trance, and close the connection.
This prevents further giving unintended suggestions to your subconscious.

One important recommendation that @moretocome missed is highlighted by his example of inheriting $500k
from an uncle (who had to die in order for that money to become available).
Subconscious doesn't have our moral sense of good / bad, or same sense of proportionality, so, it might choose a path
to your wish fulfillment that causes collateral damage.
That's why other proponents of positive thinking (e.g. Neville Goddard) recommend to embed
or attach to your wish restrictions of safety and benefit to all those involved.

This should work.

How did you know all this?

This was great of you to post. Thank you.

guthrio · #18 02-02-2020, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by inavalan

I read / browsed what @moretocome posted here and on his website.

All that argumentation is in fact intended to confuse you, the reader, and put you in a light trance. It is a method used especially by NLP practitioners (Richard Bandler, and others). The trance is meant to establish a connection to your subconscious, so that it can get your wish / suggestion less distorted by all your other noise in your head. The content of the argumentation is formulated to also point you toward your inside, toward your subconscious.

Once this happened, the next step, the forgetting about your wish, and not thinking about how the suggestion should be fulfilled, is meant to stop you from sending to your subconscious weakening suggestions like doubts, or imposing counterproductive restrictions.

The final step of thanking is meant to pull you out of trance, and close the connection. This prevents further giving unintended suggestions to your subconscious.

One important recommendation that @moretocome missed is highlighted by his example of inheriting $500k from an uncle (who had to die in order for that money to become available). Subconscious doesn't have our moral sense of good / bad, or same sense of proportionality, so, it might choose a path to your wish fulfillment that causes collateral damage. That's why other proponents of positive thinking (e.g. Neville Goddard) recommend to embed or attach to your wish restrictions of safety and benefit to all those involved.

This should work.

Inavalon,

Your post above introduces aspects to Moretocome's words which are not relayed by him...in other words, you substituted your rationale for his words.

Your efforts to promulgate obfuscations such as "All that argumentation", "confuse", "Uncle had to die", "recommendations Moretocome missed" and the "subconscious might choose a path" (ostensibly to arrange for his Uncle to "somehow die")....

are not the works of the Creator who lovingly made each and every one of us in His image, including you.

I, for one, would not trade the words of your post for the Creator's loving acts in the life of Moretocome, nor would anyone else who has experienced the Truth of the Creator's love in meeting their individual needs, or the needs of us all.

In the spirit of the only truth I've gleaned from your signature note,

These are my unparroted words, which will not, and do not, "accept" the sentiments you've offered above, that the Spirit within me rejects. No argument accepted, either.

Your "This should work" does not work for me.

guthrio · #19 02-02-2020, 06:07 PM

Duplicate post.

inavalan · #20 02-02-2020, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lomax

Good post inavalan.

You're welcome.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn

How did you know all this?

This was great of you to post. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Wondering, reading, learning, practicing, paying attention, sharing, ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by guthrio

Inavalon,

Your post above introduces aspects to Moretocome's words which are not relayed by him...in other words, you substituted your rationale for his words.

Your efforts to promulgate obfuscations such as "All that argumentation", "confuse", "Uncle had to die", "recommendations Moretocome missed" and the "subconscious might choose a path" (ostensibly to arrange for his Uncle to "somehow die")....

are not the works of the Creator who lovingly made each and every one of us in His image, including you.

I, for one, would not trade the words of your post for the Creator's loving acts in the life of Moretocome, nor would anyone else who has experienced the Truth of the Creator's love in meeting their individual needs, or the needs of us all.

In the spirit of the only truth I've gleaned from your signature note,

These are my unparroted words, which will not, and do not, "accept" the sentiments you've offered above, that the Spirit within me rejects. No argument accepted, either.

Your "This should work" does not work for me.

... You put a smile on my face. Chill!

___________________________________________
PS: Isn't it funny how angry are those who claim to know the truth, and love everybody?!

.