HOW did OPPENHEIMER WON the ATOMIC BOMB RACE Through the YOGA OF KNOWLEDGE

[OPVerma]

Those who dislike Indian Scriptures should SKIP

WHEN THE MANHATTAN ( atomic bomb plan ) project started, America was two years behind Germany.

Being a regular reader of Bhagavad-Gita ,J R Oppenheimer the chief of the Atomic bomb project and a nuclear scientist, inadvertently knew about GOD NATURE and SOUL Scientifically, as described in it.

All those who follow the Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, their consciousness gets united with GOD, and NATURE starts working in their favour. As a result Nature caused an explosion in the German Atomic Lab and destroyed it completely. God provided clue to Oppenheimer and made his efforts successful. And thus the second WW came to an end.

Seeing the explosion of the Bomb, in great fear and shock Oppenheimer uttered the verse 11.32 from Bhagavad Gita ..." Time ( God ) I am the destroyer of the worlds..."

All those whether Christian, Hindu or Jew ( excluding most Muslims as they contradict some Nature's Bio-Laws ) follow this Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, they are always victorious. Those who hate this Yoga, Nature makes them scapegoat and they are doomed ... This is what God has said in BG.

[sky]

Originally Posted by OPVerma

Those who dislike Indian Scriptures should SKIP

WHEN THE MANHATTAN ( atomic bomb plan ) project started, America was two years behind Russia.

Being a regular reader of Bhagavad-Gita ,J R Oppenheimer the chief of the Atomic bomb project and a nuclear scientist, inadvertently knew about GOD NATURE and SOUL Scientifically, as described in it.

All those who follow the Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, their consciousness gets united with GOD, and NATURE starts working in their favour. As a result Nature caused an explosion in the Russian Atomic Lab and destroyed it completely. God provided clue to Oppenheimer and made his efforts successful.

Seeing the explosion of the Bomb, in great fear and shock Oppenheimer uttered the verse 11.32 from Bhagavad Gita ..." Time ( God ) I am the destroyer of the worlds..."

All those whether Christian, Hindu or Jew ( excluding most Muslims as Nature do not favor them ) follow this Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, they are always victorious. Those who hate this Yoga, Nature makes them scapegoat and they are doomed ... This is what God has said.

" This is what God has said."..... Oh dear.

[soarmind]

Originally Posted by OPVerma

Those who dislike Indian Scriptures should SKIP

WHEN THE MANHATTAN ( atomic bomb plan ) project started, America was two years behind Russia.

Being a regular reader of Bhagavad-Gita ,J R Oppenheimer the chief of the Atomic bomb project and a nuclear scientist, inadvertently knew about GOD NATURE and SOUL Scientifically, as described in it.

All those who follow the Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, their consciousness gets united with GOD, and NATURE starts working in their favour. As a result Nature caused an explosion in the Russian Atomic Lab and destroyed it completely. God provided clue to Oppenheimer and made his efforts successful.

Seeing the explosion of the Bomb, in great fear and shock Oppenheimer uttered the verse 11.32 from Bhagavad Gita ..." Time ( God ) I am the destroyer of the worlds..."

All those whether Christian, Hindu or Jew ( excluding most Muslims as Nature do not favor them ) follow this Yoga of Scientific Knowledge, they are always victorious. Those who hate this Yoga, Nature makes them scapegoat and they are doomed ... This is what God has said.

No one in this world can agree with you about this assumption. May be you have solid proof to show us. Be understood that a person who is possessed has (a complete) United with the Gods. A mental illness person can be United with the devil.

[OPVerma]

Originally Posted by soarmind

No one in this world can agree with you about this assumption. May be you have solid proof to show us. Be understood that a person who is possessed has (a complete) United with the Gods. A mental illness person can be United with the devil.

You are here again ? My threads are not meant for you.

[soarmind]

Originally Posted by OPVerma

You are here again ? My threads are not meant for you.

It seems that there are two ways of discussion of a thread, there are agreed with it or disagreed with it. From the discussion both sides can gain some insights of each other even there's an argument or confrontation of wording. They're benefiting on both sides. One who don't know surely after discussion can know better about the realities or truths. Don't you not think so?

On the other side, the viewers will truly appreciate our discussion on the title and learn from our discussion. We're benefiting in three ways.

[OPVerma]

Originally Posted by soarmind

It seems that there are two ways of discussion of a thread, there are agreed with it or disagreed with it. From the discussion both sides can gain some insights of each other even there's an argument or confrontation of wording. They're benefiting on both sides. One who don't know surely after discussion can know better about the realities or truths. Don't you not think so?

On the other side, the viewers will truly appreciate our discussion on the title and learn from our discussion. We're benefiting in three ways.

In science and mathematics there is only one view 2+2= 4, so the question of agreement or disagreement does not arise. So we have to find that one view or God's view without arguing. We can have our personal views in matters of politics, movies, foods... but not in spirituality as the laws are fixed and any deviation in the name of 'personal view' get penalized.

You can see in my thread 'How Dangerous is literary explanations..' in spirituality section, wherein spiritual inspirationists in ISKCON have committed blunder (saying earth is flat),and in other instance many disciples were made impotent for abiding personal views of their Guru Ram Rahim.

From next time I hope you would not raise the bougy of personal view in my threads. We can discuss spiritual subject matter with respect to problems in practice and share personal experience rather than arguments.