Quote:
Originally Posted by slash112
Well said J!
sky, yeah true, there's always a balance to be had, isn't there
|
Agreed, Slash. Points (J's as well as yours)
noted.
Speaking simplistically, there's 'daddy' (
kind of) 'love' and 'mommy' (
kind of) 'love' - which are
best when 'balanced'.
Obviously,
I think that there's a 'call' for
more of the former (kind) in the present context/situation than you both and BT do.
I will most likely continue to 'stick to my guns' in the foregoing regard because of
my perception of the gross! (YUCKY YIKES!) degree to which
rampant,
monstrous disregard for
functional truth, including the 'need' for 'balance' in this regard (just witness what's happening all across the world stage for evidence of how far 'off' present 'tolerances' and 'attitudes' pertaining to 'love' of Life including the lives of all the 'children', not just of our own species!) is messing up
our 'world'. Just look at all the 'spiritual' people who are just/primarily remaining
silent and being being 'nice-nice' in terms of
just presenting 'gentle' commentary this regard (and indulging in 'feeling' 'good' in the process,
IMO!)
In
my view, though others may of course 'see' it differently, what's going on in
this forum is
just a 'microcosm' of the gross unbalance/excess of 'mommy' (kind of) love going on all over the world,
especially in 'spiritual' 'circles' I might add..
That said, I do wish you to know that your 'points' as to what
you regard as being 'appropriate' 'balance' are
really noted.
I hope you understand and will someday come to fully appreciate the 'wisdom' of my disagreement, which
I do
not express 'lightly', in said regard.
In specific terms, I think that just being 'nice' to catsquotl will just 'encourage' him to become an even more 'spoiled', self-indulging for personal 'perks', nay-nay-nay-nay-nay-sayer.