Spiritual Forums

Home


Donate!


Articles


CHAT!


Shop


 
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.

We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.

Go Back   Spiritual Forums > Spirituality & Beliefs > Science & Spirituality

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-10-2019, 04:51 PM
JustASimpleGuy
Posts: n/a
 
Consciousness, a Quantum Physics Perspective

It's a John Hagelin lecture at Stanford and it's on YouTube. Here's a brief description.

"Renowned quantum physicist, John Hagelin (PhD, Harvard), presents the thesis that consciousness is a unified field that contains nature's programming code and transcending through meditation is a pathway to hack / access consciousness."

It's a long watch, about 1 1/4 hours, but in my opinion well worth the watch.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-10-2019, 12:52 PM
Empowers Empowers is offline
Knower
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 234
 
Thank you for this. I love watching physics lectures and will watch this one tonight. I've been looking for someone to acknowledge the connection, if the lecture is anything like the description :)

<3
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-10-2019, 01:21 PM
JustASimpleGuy
Posts: n/a
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empowers
Thank you for this. I love watching physics lectures and will watch this one tonight. I've been looking for someone to acknowledge the connection, if the lecture is anything like the description :)

<3

I don't think you'll be disappointed.

Another good one is "The Primacy of Consciousness - Peter Russell - Full Version"

"Peter Russell proposes that mind is more fundamental than matter. He explores the problems science has explaining consciousness and argues that consciousness is not created by the brain, but is inherent in all beings."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-10-2019, 04:57 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color .Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space.....

Quote:
JustASimpleGuy--"Peter Russell proposes that mind is more fundamental than matter. He explores the problems science has explaining consciousness and argues that consciousness is not created by the brain, but is inherent in all beings."


....Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space....

Metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts and ego, are a resultant of occupied space interactions/interference and not the other way around.

Metaphysical-1 is concepts of Space not an actual space ergo not an occupied space phenomena.

Metaphysical-3 Gravity ( ) { occupied space }, and

Metaphysical-4 Dark Energy )( { occupied space }, have not been quantified nor quantised yet we know of their occupied space existence indirectly via their effects on other occupied space phenomena.

This latter above is not true of Metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts.

i = ego ergo metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concept and is outside{ beyond/meta } the bisected/cross-section torus I have presented above and here below.

....Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space....
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-10-2019, 11:02 AM
JustASimpleGuy
Posts: n/a
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by r6r6r
....Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space....

Metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts and ego, are a resultant of occupied space interactions/interference and not the other way around.

Metaphysical-1 is concepts of Space not an actual space ergo not an occupied space phenomena.

Metaphysical-3 Gravity ( ) { occupied space }, and

Metaphysical-4 Dark Energy )( { occupied space }, have not been quantified nor quantised yet we know of their occupied space existence indirectly via their effects on other occupied space phenomena.

This latter above is not true of Metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts.

i = ego ergo metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concept and is outside{ beyond/meta } the bisected/cross-section torus I have presented above and here below.

....Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space....

That's way above my pay grade.

You'll have to take that up with Mr. Russell or Mr. Hagelin.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-10-2019, 11:46 AM
Busby Busby is offline
Master
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,741
 
If QP is right the the 'Big Bang' would have to have been observed by 'a consciousness carrier' otherwise it would not have taken place.
__________________


The constantly promoted belief (induced by religions) that we are born to be good and obey (in order to enter heaven) is a tragic error in the concept of the universe's plan and an insult to mankind's intellect.

'A clear conscience is the sure sign of a bad memory'
- Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-10-2019, 02:35 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color .Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustASimpleGuy
That's way above my pay grade.

Pathways of rational, logical common sense, no more, no less.

.............Space( Time *) i (* Time )Space............

A big bang is just one of ocurrence of perhaps an infinite set i.e the big bang was not the creation of an eternally existent, occupied spaceUniversenor can a big crunch be the destruction of occupied space Universe.

There exists no cosmic source{ @ }, only local ignorance { *^* }.

https://www.sciencealert.com/penrose...clic-cosmology

'No the train wont stop rolling, no it wont slow down'....Ian Anderson Locomotive Breath LINK

----\/\/\/\/----> Arrow-of-Time { occupied space } is one way and that means we cannot return to the womb.

Consciousness at minimum is two, with line{s}-of-relationship adjoining the two (o)(o) ergo otherness and awareness that is at minimum, positive shaped geodesic Gravity and negative shaped geodesic Dark Energy.

I.e geometrically diametric opposite phenomena, that, we identify as occupied Space ( )( )
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-10-2019, 03:25 PM
Miss Hepburn Miss Hepburn is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Posts: 25,087
  Miss Hepburn's Avatar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBQ8pC5mTII

Thanks
I sure didn't need quantum physics to know everything is conscious, tho!
Neither does anyone else that has done deep meditation...but the left brainers love proof.
God made them, too - I must remember.

I'm really glad you joined here, Justasimpleguy.
__________________

.
*I'll text in Navy Blue when I'm speaking as a Mod. :)


Prepare yourself for the coming astral journey of death by daily riding in the balloon of God-perception.
Through delusion you are perceiving yourself as a bundle of flesh and bones, which at best is a nest of troubles.
Meditate unceasingly, that you may quickly behold yourself as the Infinite Essence, free from every form of misery. ~Paramahansa's Guru's Guru
.


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24-10-2019, 03:47 PM
JustASimpleGuy
Posts: n/a
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Hepburn
I'm really glad you joined here, Justasimpleguy.

Thanks, and so Am I. This is a great venue for expressing all the stuff that's now bouncing around inside my skull.

I've been researching consciousness in earnest and as my understanding permit since roughly 2000, and looking at it from as many perspectives as possible, even from the skeptics' point of view.

Dr. Hagelin is pretty big into the TM movement and being he's a physicist of some renown I respect his take. Plus he's an entertaining speaker. He comes across as authentic too.

He presents an interesting symmetry between physics and consciousness and I'd love to hear his take on the liar.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums