Truth

I agree with andrew g, its more about one persons truth is another persons lies. In my mind i think its more about a lack of acceptance for others ideas that affects this forum more.

Originally Posted by TzuJanLi

Greetings..

so.. before i post my understanding, i will put you on notice that i am a 'self', as are everyone

You do not speak for me, my good sir.

I agree, again the problem with people here. They think they speak for everyone. I am my own person and I will speak for MYSELF thank you very much.

[Squatchit]

Originally Posted by meta_synthesis

And suspicious.

In what way?

Greetings..

Originally Posted by meta_synthesis

You do not speak for me, my good sir.

You are correct, i speak about you.. and, about the evidence you present, here in this forum and in another..

I wish you well..

Greetings..

Originally Posted by Lostgirl

I agree, again the problem with people here. They think they speak for everyone. I am my own person and I will speak for MYSELF thank you very much.

Precisely! That's the spirit, it's nice to see people affirming their personhood, their individuality.. like Meta, it's nice to see people assert their 'selfs'..

Be well..

[hybrid]

Originally Posted by TzuJanLi

Greetings..


Precisely! That's the spirit, it's nice to see people affirming their personhood, their individuality.. like Meta, it's nice to see people assert their 'selfs'..

Be well..

their not saying they have no selves.
their saying why don't you just simply speak on your behalf.
or don't speak on their behalf or to that effect.


,

Originally Posted by TzuJanLi

Greetings..


You are correct, i speak about you.. and, about the evidence you present, here in this forum and in another..

I wish you well..

How do you know for certain I am not a nonphysical energy with no location or form?

And even if there is a physical body typing this message to you, how do you know there is a self there? Body does not = self. In fact in strict terms there is no such thing as a "body."

So you have in your mind an imagination of "meta_synthesis" and you imagine he is a "self." You imagine thus I am exactly how you imagine yourself, except I am not you, and the details are different. But the essential fundemendal strucure remains the same. You use it as a template of sorts for how you view and experience "other people" within your imagination.

In the actuality of your experience, am I not mere squiggles appearing before you on a computer monitor? Where is any "self" in that? Have I ever appeared as something else in your experience?

Not only do you imagine a meta_synthessis within your imigination, but you create it out of thin air. There is no meta_synthesis, no self, no person at all. One only ever appears within your imagination. Not in reality.

[hybrid]

wow. and i thought i am radical. LOL

Greetings..

Originally Posted by meta_synthesis

How do you know for certain I am not a nonphysical energy with no location or form?

And even if there is a physical body typing this message to you, how do you know there is a self there? Body does not = self. In fact in strict terms there is no such thing as a "body."

So you have in your mind an imagination of "meta_synthesis" and you imagine he is a "self." You imagine thus I am exactly how you imagine yourself, except I am not you, and the details are different. But the essential fundemendal strucure remains the same. You use it as a template of sorts for how you view and experience "other people" within your imagination.

In the actuality of your experience, am I not mere squiggles appearing before you on a computer monitor? Where is any "self" in that? Have I ever appeared as something else in your experience?

Not only do you imagine a meta_synthessis within your imigination, but you create it out of thin air. There is no meta_synthesis, no self, no person at all. One only ever appears within your imagination. Not in reality.

Not at all, since all we can do is evaluate the evidence presented, let me explain 'me' to 'you'.. what i do is draw from the consistency of reality, the relaibly predictable conditions based on observably verifiable histories, and my direct experiences within that reality.. then, you supply evidence and confirmation through repetitive posts, and.. yes, i construct an image of meta_synthesis in my mind, based on many factors.. no, the image is not accurate, but with the evidence provided here and elsewhere, i have enough information to talk to with and about 'meta', without concern for any significant deviations from the actuality.. as for your last paragraph, that is, as you say, your own imagination of your 'no-person', which is an interesting contradiction..

I wish you well..