On the Reflection of Worlds

[GreenGazer]

Greyson if this question has already been asked I apologize. Have you asked it what prevents us from achieving higher frequencies or levels of consciousness? Could it have to do with the density of our bodies (or matter)?

[Greyson]

Originally Posted by GreenGazer

Greyson if this question has already been asked I apologize. Have you asked it what prevents us from achieving higher frequencies or levels of consciousness? Could it have to do with the density of our bodies (or matter)?

YOU.........

[GreenGazer]

Originally Posted by Greyson

What in the...

I assure you wmsm is NOT as crazy as he first may sound...

Originally Posted by Greyson

YOU.........

Yes me Did I miss something? I mean I know it said to stop thinking in terms of density but then it uses the term "density/frequency" later in the channel. I also wanted to add to that last question as well...Will our bodies become more "dense" or "crystalline" if/when earth "evolves" or would the "evolution" or "ascension" of earth make it uninhabitable for us? Would we not evolve in time with it?

[Greyson]

Originally Posted by GreenGazer

I assure you wmsm is NOT as crazy as he first may sound...



Yes me Did I miss something? I mean I know it said to stop thinking in terms of density but then it uses the term "density/frequency" later in the channel. I also wanted to add to that last question as well...Will our bodies become more "dense" or "crystalline" if/when earth "evolves" or would the "evolution" or "ascension" of earth make it uninhabitable for us? Would we not evolve in time with it?

(me) If your frequency changes, you will "go" where your frequency takes you. There already are higher and lower versions of the Earth. It is just a case of shifting up or down with them. The third dimensional Earth will be here, unless it is utterly destroyed by some catastrophic event.

(Them) Go back to your books.

[GreenGazer]

Originally Posted by Greyson

(Them) Go back to your books.

I figured as much

Originally Posted by Greyson

(me) If your frequency changes, you will "go" where your frequency takes you. There already are higher and lower versions of the Earth. It is just a case of shifting up or down with them. The third dimensional Earth will be here, unless it is utterly destroyed by some catastrophic event.

This seems to makes sense. Thanks.

[WhiteWarrior]

I have a fresh question for our mysterious informants. And it should be right up your/their alley.

Negativity, badness, evil, I do not think they are the same neither as I nor you define them. But I would like to learn a little more of how the scale works.

Example; three fictious men.

Man number one is a robber by occupation. Late at night he go into the back streets of the city, cornering unaccompanied bypassers and take their money and other valuables at gunpoint. If his demands are not met he is willing to shoot the victims dead. His motivation for these acts is partly greed, partly to fuel an expensive drug habit. While he has no compassion for his victims whatsoever and the acts make him feel powerful, the violence itself is not what makes him continue.

Man number two appears to be nondescript, a normal citizen fulfilling a normal job. He might be a clerk in a company. But once every seventh weekend he picks up a prostitute in his car, takes her to a private place in the woods and makes her suffer badly for hours before he kills her. His motivation in these acts are the enjoyment he feels in the power of being able to do and get away with these things. I readily agree that this example is in the extreme direction but it is realistic.

The third man might be working for a school, a hospital, or a foreign aid organization. He might work to help others all day long, and he excels at it. But he also climbs steadily in the ranks of his organization, hiring and firing as necessary without any compassion whatsoever. If he is offered money or a position rise from a different employer he will not have any loyalty toward his current one. If he is offered a questionable deal he will ask only one question, whether he can get away with it or not. But all the way he will be aware that money is just a tool to get more power with. Power is his only true desire through life.

I would like to hear how you would rank these three individuals. I certainly could refer to actual people who were or are like this but this seems sufficient.

[Theophila]

Originally Posted by WhiteWarrior

I have a fresh question for our mysterious informants. And it should be right up your/their alley.

Negativity, badness, evil, I do not think they are the same neither as I nor you define them. But I would like to learn a little more of how the scale works.

Example; three fictious men.

Man number one is a robber by occupation. Late at night he go into the back streets of the city, cornering unaccompanied bypassers and take their money and other valuables at gunpoint. If his demands are not met he is willing to shoot the victims dead. His motivation for these acts is partly greed, partly to fuel an expensive drug habit. While he has no compassion for his victims whatsoever and the acts make him feel powerful, the violence itself is not what makes him continue.

Man number two appears to be nondescript, a normal citizen fulfilling a normal job. He might be a clerk in a company. But once every seventh weekend he picks up a prostitute in his car, takes her to a private place in the woods and makes her suffer badly for hours before he kills her. His motivation in these acts are the enjoyment he feels in the power of being able to do and get away with these things. I readily agree that this example is in the extreme direction but it is realistic.

The third man might be working for a school, a hospital, or a foreign aid organization. He might work to help others all day long, and he excels at it. But he also climbs steadily in the ranks of his organization, hiring and firing as necessary without any compassion whatsoever. If he is offered money or a position rise from a different employer he will not have any loyalty toward his current one. If he is offered a questionable deal he will ask only one question, whether he can get away with it or not. But all the way he will be aware that money is just a tool to get more power with. Power is his only true desire through life.

I would like to hear how you would rank these three individuals. I certainly could refer to actual people who were or are like this but this seems sufficient.

I loved this....thought provoking..,and I'd like to humbly take a stab at it (no pun intended )

I'll start with the guy number three,
He is not evil , nor technically " bad"
He just does not choose a path of honor....
Technically he isn't killing or severely hurting anyone.
The worst of what he does is his callousness in firing people without heart....or maybe try to grab a job opportunity at the expense of another person....
It's more of a selfish path......


Guy number one is bad. Again he chooses a path of selfishness , but a much higher degree in the negative path where he actually crosses the boundaries of violence and death to get what he wants.....
The only difference between him and number three....the killing part...but both nonetheless for pure selfish reasons...


Now number two....evil....and I'm sorry , sick in the head....
That man has a distorted reality, has some deep rotted sadistic issues and has pure hatred at the root of his core to reach the extreme of sexual violence and killing...he is a vessel for evil pure and simple. These persons I have seen in jails and have been asked if they feel remorse and I have yet to hear one say yes...

These where my impressions , loved the question

[Greyson]

Originally Posted by WhiteWarrior

I have a fresh question for our mysterious informants. And it should be right up your/their alley.

Negativity, badness, evil, I do not think they are the same neither as I nor you define them. But I would like to learn a little more of how the scale works.

Example; three fictious men.

Man number one is a robber by occupation. Late at night he go into the back streets of the city, cornering unaccompanied bypassers and take their money and other valuables at gunpoint. If his demands are not met he is willing to shoot the victims dead. His motivation for these acts is partly greed, partly to fuel an expensive drug habit. While he has no compassion for his victims whatsoever and the acts make him feel powerful, the violence itself is not what makes him continue.

He is a slave and of no polarity.

Originally Posted by WhiteWarrior

Man number two appears to be nondescript, a normal citizen fulfilling a normal job. He might be a clerk in a company. But once every seventh weekend he picks up a prostitute in his car, takes her to a private place in the woods and makes her suffer badly for hours before he kills her. His motivation in these acts are the enjoyment he feels in the power of being able to do and get away with these things. I readily agree that this example is in the extreme direction but it is realistic.

He may be somewhat base negative.

Originally Posted by WhiteWarrior

The third man might be working for a school, a hospital, or a foreign aid organization. He might work to help others all day long, and he excels at it. But he also climbs steadily in the ranks of his organization, hiring and firing as necessary without any compassion whatsoever. If he is offered money or a position rise from a different employer he will not have any loyalty toward his current one. If he is offered a questionable deal he will ask only one question, whether he can get away with it or not. But all the way he will be aware that money is just a tool to get more power with. Power is his only true desire through life.

He may also be somewhat base negative.

[WhiteWarrior]

Then it seems all three examples got fairly low scores. Can you explain what makes nr 1 a slave, and to who?

[Greyson]

Originally Posted by WhiteWarrior

Then it seems all three examples got fairly low scores. Can you explain what makes nr 1 a slave, and to who?

His drug habit and his obsession with power. To his vices.