Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Iamit
Would it not rather be that non dualiy is the opposite of duality, in the sense that duality being the idea of separation, and the idea of non duality being that, despite the appearance of separation, All is One.
|
What about this, just for argument's sake...
The very 'concept' of Non-Duality means that there are
no opposites, because for something to have an opposite, viz a viz Duality vs Non-Duality means they exist in dual juxtaposition within the space of a causal relativity.
Wouldn't it thus be prudent to speculate (as a means unto an end) that what exists
as the experience of Non-Duality, either transcends or incorporates both within the framework of being self-existent?
Thus, with all due logic and pure rationality (the state from which I operate), isn't it the distinction between Duality vs Non-Duality within the causal sphere, that which provides the very basis for the illusion of separation to exist in the first place? and that will lead on to
neither the 'all' nor the 'one' even existing as it negates itself through the very awareness of itself?
Threaded Mode