Home
Donate!
Articles
CHAT!
Shop
|
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.
We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.
|
26-03-2014, 01:10 AM
|
Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 6,575
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I do.
The concept, Ecth. is so well entrenched now in human psychi and understanding, that is has been excellently illustrated in popular media now, and by the Wachowski's.
Back in 1999.
Which same aligns with the "Holographic Universe", as proposed by Physicst Brian Greene,
"The Mathematical Universe" involving Max Tegmark. And others of course.
Also in '99, "The Thirteenth Floor" realeased in the media, and "Existenze".
As well... physicist Julian Barbour's work came out,
"The End of Time".
Also understood is how Space is involved with Time. Yes?
Video, involving Professor of Physics, Michio Kaku...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jremlZvNDuk
Concerning, "The Mathematical Universe".
Who, himself also states:
"The universe is a symphony of strings, and the mind of God that Einstein eloquently wrote about for thirty years would be cosmic music resonating through eleven-dimensional hyper space."
Who, in his book, "Hyperspace" discusses the validity of the Wachowski's illustration, also.
My profile quote below is illustrative, as well, from Einstein.
Who stated, as is documented...
"Time and Space are modes in which we think, and not conditions in which we live."
Atheists however continue to hate, deny, and eschew this.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eschew
So, involving the thread topic, again both Evolution and Creation are evident. Any Creation or, "Program", has a Creator or "Programmer", of it.
__________________
"I believe there are two sides to the phenomena known as death. This side where we live, and the other side, where we shall continue to live.
Eternity does not start with death.
We are in eternity now." - Norman Vincent Peale
"There is no place in this new kind of physics for both the field and matter, for the field is the only reality." - A. Einstein
|
26-03-2014, 11:19 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morpheus
Atheists however continue to hate, deny, and eschew this.
|
Yet more generalisations Morph.
A good proportion of the physicists who help us to understand the nature of the universe are atheists.
Stephen Hawking springs to mind.
|
29-03-2014, 09:47 AM
|
Master
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 6,575
|
|
|
|
|
In fact, regarding the state of things, Phyisicsts who want to have a career keep their faith in low profile.
Yes, Stephen Hawking is very good at the math equations. However, he himself admits to errors.
__________________
"I believe there are two sides to the phenomena known as death. This side where we live, and the other side, where we shall continue to live.
Eternity does not start with death.
We are in eternity now." - Norman Vincent Peale
"There is no place in this new kind of physics for both the field and matter, for the field is the only reality." - A. Einstein
|
08-04-2014, 07:59 PM
|
Experiencer
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 375
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps one is the intrinsic value of the other. Without creation, there would be no cause for evolution. Without evolution, there would be no purpose in creation.
To what extremes this occurs is still a mystery and too me. The more we learn about life, the more complex and puzzling the question becomes. I do not think this science is anywhere near settled.
__________________
Sapere Aude,
Semper
A man who has not passed through the inferno of his passions has not overcome them.
-- Carl Jung
|
09-04-2014, 02:16 AM
|
Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,882
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamerkid_24
Some say god created the everything,some say evolution I say both. What do you think
|
sincerely and honestly?
i don't know
|
09-04-2014, 06:22 AM
|
|
I'm not sure what you by "the everything" but, I'm a believer of life as we know it is from evolution and not creationism.
|
09-04-2014, 12:03 PM
|
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
|
|
|
|
|
4 Kinds of Evolution
1) Simple( part ) > Complex( whole )
2) Complex( whole ) > Simple( part )
-----------------------
1) Evolution as resultant of primary set of intentions to direct our evolution that specific way/driection,
2) Evolution as 2ndary resultant i.e. a 90 degree, precessionay side affect of our primary intented evolution directions.
Universe = God{ ess } = Great Mama = Great Spirit = Cosmos etc....
We live in an eternally existent and finite, occupied space Universe, that is embraced by macro-micro infinite, non-occupied space. imho
r6
|
09-04-2014, 04:28 PM
|
|
Perhaps I see things differently then everyone here. I see that reality exists as intent and will. We intend awareness into perception.
|
10-04-2014, 01:29 PM
|
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
|
|
|
|
|
I Think About Something Via a Something( r6 )
Quote:
Originally Posted by somnium
Perhaps I see things differently then everyone here. I see that reality exists as intent and will. We intend awareness into perception.
|
Awareness of physical / energy precedes metaphysical conceptualization thereof i.e. I think about a physical / erngy something experience, via a physical / energy something, called a nervous system if not more specifically a brain.
Experience precedes the metaphysical concepts about--- derived from --the experience. imho
No physical / energy existence means there can be no metaphysical conceptulization. imho
|
10-04-2014, 01:54 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by r6r6r
Awareness of physical / energy precedes metaphysical conceptualization thereof i.e. I think about a physical / erngy something experience, via a physical / energy something, called a nervous system if not more specifically a brain.
Experience precedes the metaphysical concepts about--- derived from --the experience. imho
No physical / energy existence means there can be no metaphysical conceptulization. imho
|
That is merely the awareness you are intending into form. If you can become aware of the unformed potential of reality, before it is cast into form, you can better see how even our bodies and our brains are formed with intent and will. You can perceive it either way, because the potential exists in every way, but be sure that you accept the results of that awareness before you accept it. Reality itself is made of infinite potential.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:27 PM.
|