Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dattaseva
Hi Lorelyen,
The categorization is simply based on a single point - one needs to differentiate between a false vision and a true one.
In the spiritual field, it's always healthy to perceive subjective experiences with a grain of salt. After all, real spirituality has only to do with understanding the truth and ridding oneself of illusion. Cheers!
|
I've omitted much from your response because I suspect we're talking of visions
in different ways. I wasn't necessarily referring to clairvoyant-type visions which
as you say can only be validated in the concrete (concrete = saves me using the word reality
and all the baggage that comes with that).
As to your closing para, I'm not sure what you're getting at. We perceive and as a result we experience
and the experience will
always be subjective. I can see no way around that.
It pertains only to the experiencer. Example: on hearing a piece of
music each of an audience will experience it but whether they experience
the same thing even partially can never be ascertained because they can't
communicate their personal experience among themselves.
But then you go on to talk about truth...which again is individual. It could even
be the process of individuation.
Understanding the truth is a big ask. When you discover a truth, whether or
not it's
the truth, how and why would you understand it. Trying to understand
the truth
would seem to be like trying to understand a piece of cake.
If you discover the truth you have it.
So, aside from not being sure what you mean by
real spirituality I posit that
on someone reckoning to find the truth, they really do start asking questions.
To me, the truth is akin to the Holy Grail.
Everyone is spiritual so it's a matter of how they acknowledge it and if they so choose, work toward becoming what they should be.
...
Linear Mode
