Spiritual Forums

Home


Donate!


Articles


CHAT!


Shop


 
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.

We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.

Go Back   Spiritual Forums > Spirituality & Beliefs > Science & Spirituality

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 23-05-2017, 07:58 AM
OPVerma OPVerma is offline
Experiencer
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 455
 
Indian Scriptures contain all most all the knowledge ( except Chemical Engineering ) that takes about 12 years to study. Instead of doing LHC Experiment Scientists should read Indian Scriptures.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 23-05-2017, 10:38 AM
Baile Baile is offline
Master
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,668
  Baile's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPVerma
Instead of doing LHC Experiment Scientists should read Indian Scriptures.
Yes, science could use a healthy dose of occult knowledge and wisdom. As could the church lol.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23-05-2017, 12:04 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Fish What Split From What When and How?

Quote:
I also believe the Anunnaki (a highly advanced alien race) created what we deem today as modern man. Mixing their dna with the ape man dna, which we get as modern man today

While that may be possible Strange, what we have evidence of is a split between apes and human about 7.5 million years ago irrespective of how that split occurred.

The question then becomes did more complex humans exist first, and,

1} apes split off them via too much inbreeding, or, did apes exist first, and.

2} apes via ingesting mushrooms{ or whatever } transistion to first humans{ proto-humans }.

Kinky hair most likely developed from needing brain/skull protected from intense sun on African savannah.

Fair skin most likely developed from ice age living in caves.

Eskimoes did not develop the the fair skin becuase they more recent to far north lattitudes and they got their vitman D from whale and seal blubber.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorStrange
I believe certain races of people were brought here from other planets.

Pansperima does neccesssarily require creatures with mind accessing abilities, but cannot rule that possibility out. The basics for biological life exists in metors, asteroids and comets.

There is laboratory direct evidence of more complex molecules being the direct resultant of higher pressures created from ET impact events on Earth.

IF we were to extapolate out those lab experiences out to the most extreme scenarios, then we could have a scenario of most intense pressures of Universe, as black holes, could produce the most complex bioloigcals of Universe we know to exist, humans.

An alternative scenario, at minimum, the intense pressures of black holes would create the most complex sets of RNA-DNA.

We also forget the 2nd most complex mammals on Earth, putting aside apes, is cetacceans. This introduces panspermia scenario occurrences at differrent times going back 50 plus million years.

Here is link to latest findings of bones in ears of wolves being like those in whales ergo this following scenario of wolves going to ocean and evolving into whales.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...bXDk4Q9QEILjAA

http://www.panspermia.org/

r6
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 17-01-2019, 07:03 PM
OPVerma OPVerma is offline
Experiencer
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 455
 
[quote=sky123]
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPVerma

This Thread is meant to trace the scientific reasons for differences in physical make up of humans and should not be taken in racist context.

Anthropologists believe, that humans have evolved from primates in Africa during 5- 6 million years ago and their physical makeup changed while migrating to different parts of the world.

Indian Scriptures give an account of their origin from different ' Prajapaties' or Progenitors.

2 billion years ago Brahma, prototype human, produced 10 Progenitors by biological fission on Pamir. 10 Progenitors in their Airy Bodies dispersed in different directions, and became the fore fathers of different human races. as folows

Angira : Red Indians.
Marich : Europeans, Middle East, Indians.
Vashisth : Chinese Japanese, Central Asians.
Pulah ; Short Pygmies
Pilastya : Tall Africans Julus.
Daksha ; Indian
... ... ...
During past 100 millions , there has been a lot of migrations and intermixing.The present Europeans are inter mixture of genetically modified humans 'Gurunds' + Devas sons of Kashyap / Marich, + Aryan Indians. ( Source : The Real History of the Ancient World' ISBN 9788190950268 )

Thus it is apparent that progenitors with different genes are responsible for the difference in physical makeup of humans and not what the Anthropologists speculate. They should update their knowledge, revise the textbooks, and stop misguiding people.[/QUOTE



and I thought it was just Evolution ]


It is really sad that western scholars love to speculate in their living rooms without taking the trouble of study and research. Indian Scriptures contain all history but require at least 12 years of full time study besides the background knowledge of modern science, arts and engineering.

National Geographic who are pioneers in Evolution Research have admitted that Darwin was wrong and man has not descended from apes in their Nov 04 issue.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-01-2019, 10:31 AM
OPVerma OPVerma is offline
Experiencer
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 455
 
Modern Science has found only half whereas Indian scriptures contain full Science

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baile
Yes, science could use a healthy dose of occult knowledge and wisdom. As could the church lol.

Modern Science has found only half whereas Indian scriptures contain full Science. For example Scientists describe CNO Triple alpha nuclear reaction that begins from carbon , nitrogen oxygen, but Indian Scriptures describe it beginning from Thought Energy Maya.

Ref SF Link http://www.spiritualforums.com/vb/sh...d.php?t=112098

Scientists have made error in calculation of the age of the Universe to be 13.7 billion years, where as Indian Scriptures give the correct age 155.4 trillion years verified by 4 mathematical calculations.

The Periodic Table of elements has over 36 gaps whereas Indian Scriptures fill them up with Bio and Neuro elements.

Scientists have yet to discover Bio-molecular reactions given in Indian scriptures.

Scientists have no knowledge of God, Nature, Soul, Evolution, Human History, Karma and a lot more that has been described in over 0.4 million verses in the Indian Scriptures.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-01-2019, 11:03 AM
OPVerma OPVerma is offline
Experiencer
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 455
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by r6r6r
While that may be possible Strange, what we have evidence of is a split between apes and human about 7.5 million years ago irrespective of how that split occurred.

The question then becomes did more complex humans exist first, and,

1} apes split off them via too much inbreeding, or, did apes exist first, and.

2} apes via ingesting mushrooms{ or whatever } transistion to first humans{ proto-humans }.

Kinky hair most likely developed from needing brain/skull protected from intense sun on African savannah.

Fair skin most likely developed from ice age living in caves.

Eskimoes did not develop the the fair skin becuase they more recent to far north lattitudes and they got their vitman D from whale and seal blubber.



Pansperima does neccesssarily require creatures with mind accessing abilities, but cannot rule that possibility out. The basics for biological life exists in metors, asteroids and comets.

There is laboratory direct evidence of more complex molecules being the direct resultant of higher pressures created from ET impact events on Earth.

IF we were to extapolate out those lab experiences out to the most extreme scenarios, then we could have a scenario of most intense pressures of Universe, as black holes, could produce the most complex bioloigcals of Universe we know to exist, humans.

An alternative scenario, at minimum, the intense pressures of black holes would create the most complex sets of RNA-DNA.

We also forget the 2nd most complex mammals on Earth, putting aside apes, is cetacceans. This introduces panspermia scenario occurrences at differrent times going back 50 plus million years.

Here is link to latest findings of bones in ears of wolves being like those in whales ergo this following scenario of wolves going to ocean and evolving into whales.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...bXDk4Q9QEILjAA

http://www.panspermia.org/

r6


I believe certain races of people were brought here from other planets.

The question is How did those species originate on that Planet ? and who brought them. Instead of speculation we should try to study what the written record say.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-01-2019, 03:35 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color

Just so were clear, humans or their RNA-DNA, may have been sent from other planets, but is a seperate, aside issue or point of view from my comments.



Quote:
Originally Posted by OPVerma
I believe certain races of people were brought here from other planets.
The question is How did those species originate on that Planet ? and who brought them. Instead of speculation we should try to study what the written record say.
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 24-01-2019, 12:10 PM
Altair Altair is offline
Master
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Everywhere... and Nowhere
Posts: 6,631
  Altair's Avatar
There's zero reason to believe human 'races' come from other planets. We share most of our DNA with primates and differences in skin colour are due to sunlight exposure. Favourable characteristics have a better chance of survival and thus reproduction, which is why 'Europeans' became predominantly white and 'Africans' became predominantly black when humans continued to lose more body hair.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OPVerma
It is really sad that western scholars love to speculate in their living rooms without taking the trouble of study and research. Indian Scriptures contain all history but require at least 12 years of full time study besides the background knowledge of modern science, arts and engineering.
Scriptures are just written words.
If Indian scripture contain all history then why don't they tell stories of Ancient Greece, the Eocene epoch, or mammoths and polar bears? Need I go on?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 31-01-2019, 10:54 AM
OPVerma OPVerma is offline
Experiencer
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 455
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Altair
There's zero reason to believe human 'races' come from other planets. We share most of our DNA with primates and differences in skin colour are due to sunlight exposure. Favourable characteristics have a better chance of survival and thus reproduction, which is why 'Europeans' became predominantly white and 'Africans' became predominantly black when humans continued to lose more body hair.

Scriptures are just written words.
If Indian scripture contain all history then why don't they tell stories of Ancient Greece, the Eocene epoch, or mammoths and polar bears? Need I go on?


Indian Scriptures contain 15 billion years science and history of earth from its birth and therefore it is not possible to include minor events. From 13.89 b - 1.97 b only 3 persons Brahma, Madhu and Kaitav lived on the earth. Airy bodied humans emerged from 1.97 b years and on wards.

Indian Scriptures describe about Tethys sea, Geological events of division of Pangaea into 7 continents, Continental drift, separation of Greenland and Scandinavian, Great wars etc. They tell about origins of Greeks , Europeans, Egyptians, Central Asians ... ,Eocene , Miocene, Great world conquerors, civilizations origins of lions bears, dinosaurs Whales and all. It has been summarized in the Title ' The Real History of the Ancient World'.

If you are still sticking to Big Bang and Charles Darwin then you know very little.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 31-01-2019, 11:10 AM
Altair Altair is offline
Master
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Everywhere... and Nowhere
Posts: 6,631
  Altair's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPVerma
Indian Scriptures describe about Tethys sea, Geological events of division of Pangaea into 7 continents, Continental drift, separation of Greenland and Scandinavian, Great wars etc. They tell about origins of Greeks , Europeans, Egyptians, Central Asians ... ,Eocene , Miocene, Great world conquerors, civilizations origins of lions bears, dinosaurs Whales and all. It has been summarized in the Title ' The Real History of the Ancient World'.
Feel free to show us where exactly in the scripture we can find reference to all of the above..
You have my attention and interest. As for the book you mention.. I'd much rather check the sources themselves than someone's interpretation of it.

As for evolution.. it's simply happening.. in micro-organisms, in birds, in humans. Favourable characteristics survive and live on in future generations. This has brought us different human 'races' as well. This world is ever changing and physical evolution is very much part of that. That acknowledgement by itself does not mean atheist materialism is correct, because I know it is not.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums