Newly proposed theory supports the concept of reincarnation

[revelant]

This theory supports the proposition that physical reality and the observable universe exists as a hologram on the 2D surface of a black hole.* The theory makes a distinction between the physical universe which we can observe [and which is finite in time and space] and the sterile free space vacuum within which our*observable universe exists. *- and which [from the perspective of existing in spacetime], therefore*cannot be*observed. The free space vacuum represents the static rest state of the universe [if left to its' own devices] - possessing zero mass or energy*and represents the ultimate definition of nothingness.* It would also be reasonable to declare that this definition of nothingness as defined by the model represents an infinite universe outwith the dimensions of time and space and within which physical reality and our finite observable universe exists.

This 'unobservability' of the static rest state of the universe isn't just to do with the technological restrictions on the limits imposed by the* accuracy of the measuring equipment, it is ultimately* infinitely unknowable and this is determined by*the simple fact that the measuring equipment is itself constantly moving through space and time, and that therefore any measurements or calculations of time and space*can only be made from the perspective*of existing within*the space time continuum. As such, the Planck constant represents the barrier between that which*can ever be known of the observable universe, and that which can never be known.** **
​
The ultimate conclusions*of this theory are as follows:*

1. The observable universe in which we exist is but one in an*infinity of separate and individual finite universes which exists in the universe as a whole. The laws of physics as we understand them* applies to each individual separate universe and*throughout the universe as a whole.*The geometrical* structure of the universe as a whole is an infinite fractal based on expanding spirals within spirals.*

The specific physical process which creates the Big Bang which initiates the beginning of the relative time and space of each individual universe can only be performed by a living organism. This principle of course also applies to the Big Bang of our own observable universe.

The living organism which created the BB of our own universe exists within it's own relative parent universe - and the external universe which can be observed by any living organism can be regarded as being the child universe which was created within the parent universe of the living being which created the BB of the child universe. This process of the creation of individual universes*occurs ad infinitum and is perpetual.* * * *

2. From the perspective of any given*atom of matter*at any given moment in time, the nucleus represents the relative centre of the observable universe in*which*it exists. Since living tissue is made of atoms, this concept also applies to every*living organism in the universe.**

3. The physical body of living organisms has a finite mortal lifespan. Every living organism*which can intentionally move independently in 3D space*possesses a level consciousness to a lesser or greater degree. The individual consciousness which a living*organism possesses has an infinite and eternal existence which is outwith the confines of space and time and therefore physical reality. For every living organism, physical reality is finite in time and space - whilst the consciousness which it possesses is infinite and eternal.* As such, each and every*organism represents the present mortal living*custodian of it's own immortal consciousness.*
​
4. *Although the physical observable universe is finite, time and space in respect of the universe as a whole is infinite. As such, the number of habitable planets with civilisations with an intellect which is* comparable*to human beings is also infinite. If we apply the recognised principle of infinity [which states*that a room full of monkeys with eternal access to 100 typewriters will eventually produce the works of Shakespeare], then it is reasonable to assume that in an infinity of habitable planets, every possible permutation of types*of societies on those planets*will be represented.**

5. This theory states that consciousness is*directly related to the speed of light. The type of society which exists on the surface of any given planet represents the frequency of the specific collective consciousness of the inhabitants of that planet.*

At the moment of death of any given human being, their consciousness is instantaneously reborn [reincarnated] into another physical body. Since consciousness exists outwith the confines of physical space and time,*the new body into which it is reincarnated can occupy any other alternative coordinates of space-time and*physical reality. It goes without saying perhaps that the physical body which the consciousness is reincarnated in, can only exist on one of the infinity of habitable planets.*In the specific case of the consciousness of a human being, the particular kind of society [and planet] into which it is reincarnated, is entirely and wholly determined by the kind of person they were at the moment of their death in their previous life.
​
The specific frequency of their consciousness at the moment of their death will resonate with the specific frequency of the collective consciousness of the planet onto which they will be reincarnated -and therefore dictates the kind of society they will exist in in their next life.*If we compare consciousness with that of a photon, then by analogy and from the perspective of consciousness,* no time passes between the moment of death of the previous life and the moment of reincarnation in the next life.**(This particular principle represents the ultimate definition of Karma).*

6. Since an infinity of every permutation*of societies*can exist*in an infinite universe, it is therefore reasonable to believe that over eons of time and within that infinity of civilisations,*there has evolved enlightened societies who have achieved global harmony and who live in peace. An infinite universe dictates that not only are such 'paradise' planets*possible, but that their existence is inevitable.

And again it is not unreasonable to assume that such enlightened civilizations would only be able to evolve and thrive where there is an absence of global conflicts and war - and where the global economy is based on positive emotions such as*love, compassion, tolerance and empathy.* Such emotions would then represent the collective consciousness which is being radiated from the surface of that 'paradise' planet.
​
If this theory is correct it means that if you live your day to day life according to these principles, then at the moment of your death in this existence, your consciousness will resonate with the collective consciousness of an enlightened civilisation and you will be reincarnated in your next life on a 'paradise' planet.* Since negative emotions such as hate, intolerance, greed etc would be alien to such civilisations which exist on these planets, you will not be exposed to such emotions throughout your mortal existence on that planet.*

As such, at the moment of death of the inhabitants of that planet, the frequency of their consciousness will again resonate with another 'paradise' planet. It would appear that the*chain of separate physical existences in an infinite*cycle of deaths and rebirths on different*paradise planets*for all eternity represents the ultimate definition of Heaven.

If you believe that the scenario of heaven as described by this theory represents*the definition of Heaven, then it will eventually occur to you that since you obviously exist on a planet with a global society which is as far removed from being described as enlightened as you could get,*that you do not exist in Heaven.* And now that you know what the definition of existing in Heaven is, an eternity of your soul existing in anything less represents the definition of your soul existing in Hell.*
​
The most uplifting aspect of this proposed model of the universe is that it dictates that only the consciousness of the good guys can go to Heaven. Since every human being is the present custodian of their own immortal consciousness/soul and that the state of the latter at the moment of your death determines the planet and kind of society you will be reincarnated into in your next physical existence, every human being can thus be considered as being their own God.

If this theory is correct, it represents the final judgement day for every individual person on this planet.*

[inavalan]

I don't know who's the author of this theory, but it has too many weaknesses to be worth a critique, in my opinion.

If you reproduced it accurately, here, the theory is too convoluted, mixes up too many trivial concepts, and emphasizes too much the humanity, the physical universe, and just kicks the can down the infinite road.

Sorry, I realize that you're enthusiastic about that model, but you started a discussion, and didn't restrict it to those who like it.

[desert rat]

I just skimmed through your text,it looks like your starting a book.

[revelant]

Originally Posted by desert rat

I just skimmed through your text,it looks like your starting a book.

I am the author of this proposed alternative model on the nature of physical reality. Any book which I may write, will be based on science and physics. I have begun to construct a website which will describe the model in detail.

My problem is that my powers of description leaves a lot to be desired. This primarily stems from the fact that the model describes an entirely holistic universe. Every aspect of the proposed theory is an integral part of the whole. Trying to find where to begin describing the model is like trying to get on a merry go round whilst it's moving. I find myself constantly having to backtrack to describe another [seemingly disparate ] aspect of the model in order that the aspect I am presently describing makes sense to the reader.

The following 1st draft excerpt describes the connection between consciousness and gravity.
​

​

The black hole of the big Bang occured in the past of the relative present moment of the parent universe in which it was created. The singularity represents the creation of a new universe.



The gravity pulse which radiates out from the singularity is therefore expanding into a vacuum of nothingness.*The radial velocity of the pulse of the expansion*of space is determined by the degree of*energy used by the living being who performed the particular physical manoeuvre in the parent universe. The value of the energy expounded by the creator in the parent universe in the execution of the manoeuvre determines the specific* relative Planck constant of that particular new universe.**

​

The expansion of the gravity pulse in free space [of the Big Bang of the*new 'child' universe] occurs in specific shells with radii corresponding with the Planck constant. The front edge of the folding of free space in increments of 1 relative Planck length to 1 relative second therefore also represents the relative radial velocity of the expansion of time from the moment of the BB.* Since space is folded by the gravity pulse in increments of 1 Planck length, therefore also means that the flow of*time is itself quantised.* **



Gravity is the physical manifestation of consciousness.*The existence*of an apparent force of gravity is a consequence of the perpetual movement of matter within the universe and that* the sole cause of all movement in the universe is consciousness*. The movement of matter creates the space-time in which matter itself*becomes physically manifest.*

​

When it becomes impossible for any information to be transferred between any 2 points A,B in space, then any local event which occurs at either A or B can never affect the physical condition of the other.

​

If we imagine a hypothetical cosmos where the whole content of the universe consisted of only 2 stars A,B which are surrounded by their respective planetary*solar systems. Assume in this hypothetical situation that the 2 dimensional distance between points A,B is expanding at a fixed rate over time. Although* the light from each star will become increasingly red-shifted over time, the positions of each star relative to each other within their 2 dimensional relationship can be regarded as unmoving and static.*



If we regard both stars in isolation for the time being, the nuclei of both are surrounded by the*matter which rotates around the centre*and which accounts for*the mass of the star.* *[ And which is also the source of the* mutual force of gravity exerted on both*].

​

If we assume that the specific local rotational velocity of the matter which exists at the surface of each star remains constant for both - and if we extrapolate the distance by which the stars separate to infinity, then we eventually reach a distance between them where the rotational velocity of the matter at the surface of each star fails to register at A,B as 1 Planck length of lateral movement per 1 Planck second.*



When this specific distance is achieved it no longer becomes possible to transfer information from the surface of star*A,B to it's neighbour and any*gravitational influence*between them ceases.* As the distance between both solar systems continues to increase, we eventually also reach a distance where the rotational velocity of the planets also fails to register locally as any lateral movement at A,B. At this distance the solar systems of A,B can be regarded as being static relative to each other and becomes a single point of increasingly red shifted light having no local gravitational affect.* Since the transfer of*information between the 2 stars becomes impossible, their existences relative to each other would become unknowable and*would signify the end of that*hypothetical 2 star universe.*



The moment in time and space that the ability*to transfer of information between any 2 points in 2 dimensions ceases is determined by the radial distance between them and the lateral velocity of the matter which rotates around the single point coordinate.*



After 13.7 billion years of the expansion of time and space, we exist on the Planck shell which occurred at the moment when the lateral movement of that shell relative to the static coordinate of the BB, became zero.* All matter which exists on that shell can therefore be regarded as being static in time.* *



All matter which exists on the surface of the sphere/shell can be regarded as being represented as a particle. On the surface of the sphere, a*particle exists only in the present - and every particle of matter has a finite lifespan which*it exists in the present* as a solid object having mass and volume. The lifespan of a particle of matter is determined by it's Planck radius . The latter also determines the wavelength position* of the elemental particle in the EM spectrum*when measured over time.* **

​

* Consciousness in our universe*occured 13.7 billion years after the moment of the BB,*when the lateral movement of the region of the universe in which we exist became zero relative to the coordinate in spacetime of the Big Bang. This universal expansion of space and time*event occurred as a shell or sphere having a*specific*radius [ as determined by the distance travelled at the speed of light after 13.7 billion years].*

​

When this event occurred the only force which exists in the universe at that specific moment in time [ ie, the gravity wave pulse of the Big Bang ] ceases to have any influence on any event which occurs on the surface of the Planck sphere. If the only energy which exists in the universe is that which was created at the moment of the BB and if we assume that the BB energy is expanding 'into'* a free space vacuum, and that therefore there is no energy which exists 'outside' the shell,* then this event should theoretically signify the end of the universe.

​

Consciousness*is represented by a wavelength frequency which is determined by the time it takes to fold one quantum of space. This specific period of time it takes to form a shell with a radius of 1 Planck length represents 1 Planck second**- ie the velocity of*a gravity pulse through free space and which therefore represents the velocity of the speed of light.

​

The behaviour over time of any matter* which exists 'in' the shell is no longer influenced by the energy of the BB. The behaviour of matter in the shell must therefore only be being influenced over time by a 2nd force which is not the energy of the BB.* If this was not the case, then the moment that the the shell reaches the critical distance relative to the BB would signify the end of the movement of matter in the universe. If there was no 2nd force and without the influence of the energy of the BB to govern the movement of matter over time in one particular direction, then the particles of matter if left to their own devices would take the natural path of least resistance*and* lie static on the surface of the sphere/shell.* Time and space would cease to exist.*

​

The future path of inanimate matter which exists on the surface of the sphere with regard to any given physical event* and when unaffected*by an external force and when the possible future path is limited to one of 2 choices, will always be 50/50 with regard to the chances of which actual*path that the particle eventually takes.



All living matter can only exist on a Planck sphere with a radius which is a whole integer of Planck time.* * Human beings exist on the surface of a shell which has a wavelength frequency in the vacuum of free space which accommodates the evolutionary development over eons of time*of the eventual ability of a living organism to be able to choose between a minimum of 2 choices which way it moves in 3D space.* The aspect of the*intentionality of the living organism to be able to choose between 2 possible options, and perhaps overrule any instinctive actions,**represents the existence of the beginning of intelligent consciousness in a living organism.*



It should also be noted that the intentionality of physical actions of the organism also represents the base definition of the organism possessing an element of free will.**Consciousness is therfore an evolved characteristic which can only be acquired by organisms possessing a certain *sufficient level of*intelligence.**

​

The movement of* inanimate matter if left undisturbed by any external 3rd force* does not*disturb the synchronicity of the equilibrium of space and time which exists on the surface of the Planck shell. A pen lying on a table will do nothing and just lie there for all eternity unless influenced by a force which is external to it.

​

At some point over eons of*time in the evolutionary history of life on our planet, there must have been a moment when a single living organism which possessed the ability to decide which physical action to take and in which direction it will go, realised at the most basic level that it's actions in the present directly influenced it's physical state in the future.**That moment represents the beginning of the epoch in the evolution of life on this planet where the behaviour of inanimate matter *was*directly influenced by the consciousness of the living*organisms which inhabited it's surface.*



If we recall that the original organism ultimately exists on the 2-D surface of a Planck shell,* then at* the precise*moment that the organism performs the specific physical manoeuvre which creates a*big bang, the new universe which expands out from that BB now also includes the revised level of consciousness of the organism.*

​

Every new 'child' universe which is created by a living organism, is identical to the*universe as it exists at that precise 'frozen' moment in the present of the parent universe - except now for the inclusion of the free will consciousness of the living organism which initiated the specific physical action which created the particular Big Bang event.*



Since the organism is static in time on the surface of the Planck sphere, the wavelength of the new level of consciousness becomes instantly amenable to every living organism which presently exists on the surface of the sphere at that moment. With the new found ability to manipulate inanimate matter to it's advantage, it enabled life not only to survive but to begin to flourish. This particular moment of*amelioration*of different species of organisms*on the planet would perhaps explain the Cambrian explosion.* * * * * *

[wstein]

Originally Posted by inavalan

I don't know who's the author of this theory, but it has too many weaknesses to be worth a critique, in my opinion...

I will venture a couple of critiques but largely agree with inavalan.

There is a tiny proposal at the beginning about the (this?) universe being a hologram on the surface of a black hole, which is NOT a new proposal. The origin of this black hole is completely ignored.

Then follows a list of 'ultimate conclusions' which in NO way follow from the proposal. Specifically, the proposal says nothing about nor would it indicate anything about: multiple universes, fractal structure of universes, Big Bang, any role of living things within, the nature of civilizations, consciousness, death, reincarnation, Heaven.

"5. This theory states that consciousness" pretty much reflects the whole write up on this theory. Namely that it is incoherent and inconsistent. The theory does NOT say anything about 'consciousness'.

[revelant]

Originally Posted by wstein

I will venture a couple of critiques but largely agree with inavalan.

There is a tiny proposal at the beginning about the (this?) universe being a hologram on the surface of a black hole, which is NOT a new proposal. The origin of this black hole is completely ignored.

Then follows a list of 'ultimate conclusions' which in NO way follow from the proposal. Specifically, the proposal says nothing about nor would it indicate anything about: multiple universes, fractal structure of universes, Big Bang, any role of living things within, the nature of civilizations, consciousness, death, reincarnation, Heaven.

"5. This theory states that consciousness" pretty much reflects the whole write up on this theory. Namely that it is incoherent and inconsistent. The theory does NOT say anything about 'consciousness'.

There has to be a restriction on the degree of detail [regarding the theory as a whole] I can write about on a forum. I fully recognise that the reader is required to accept a number of assumptions in respect of the conclusions incorporated in the model. As stated previously, I am constructing a website which aims to describe the model in detail.

As far as I can gather, this proposed model of the universe is unique. I reached the conclusion that physical reality exists on the 2D surface of a black hole by a different route than that taken by Alan Guth.

This proposal states that the Big Bang which signifies the beginning of the space and time of our own observable universe, was created at specific coordinate in the 3D space of a parent universe by a living organism which exists within that parent universe. Our own observable universe can be regarded as being the child universe of the parent universe.

There is physical phenomena which occurs in the universe which can only be initiated by the free will of conscious living organism. More specifically there is a specific physical manoeuvre which creates this phenomena which can only be performed by an intelligent conscious living being.

This phenomena occurs in the universe when a force applied by the organism which exists in any given parent universe, is met by an equal and opposite force which has a trajectory in a direction which is exactly 180 degrees to the original. At the relevant Planck scale of reference of the parent universe, a static coordinate which contains a particle of matter and which exists only in the static present, becomes occupied with it's own anti-particle.

However, because matter is formed in incremental shells from the inside out and takes a specific period of time to crystallize, it is therefore created in the past of the actual moment that the nuclei of both particles collided at the same coordinate.

The mutual annihilation of both particles at the Planck scale therefore occurs in the past of the parent universe. Despite the fact that the moment that the 2 nuclei intersect at the same coordinate occurs before the annihilation of both particles, the event nonetheless represents the source of a pulse of 'existence' which is radiating [ not into the present 3D space of the parent universe ] but into a free space vacuum of nothingness. The coordinate at which the annihilation of the 2 particles occurred exists forever in the relative past of the parent universe.

The specific coordinate at which the energy of the annihilation is released is therefore relative to nothing in time or space.

A living organism performs this specific physical manoeuvre at the Planck scale when they apply a second force which is opposite to the first force they were previously applying. The most important thing is that the second opposite force is applied before the movement of the first force has ended.

If you watch a slo-mo video of someone blowing a raspberry, the soft fleshy tissue appears fluid like in movement. This wavelike movement property of living tissue, ensures that the coordinate where the particle and anti-particle collide, is focussed on one point in space-time.

We perform this action simply by walking down the street. The swinging movement of our arms is a combination of rhythmical opposing motions. This physical phenomena occurs at a coordinate in the 3D space of the parent universe which represents the apex point where the deceleration in one direction is met with the acceleration in the opposite direction. The phenomena occurs in particular at the tips of the fingers as we walk down the street.

On every occasion that a living being performs this physical manoeuvre, a big bang and a new physical universe is created at a static coordinate which is relative in time and space only to itself.

[wstein]

Originally Posted by revelant

There has to be a restriction on the degree of detail [regarding the theory as a whole] I can write about on a forum.

Clearly you left too much out as others are unable to follow along from the 'proposal' to any of your conclusions.

I suggest you write it ALL out somewhere else and put a link to it in this topic.

Originally Posted by revelant

I fully recognise that the reader is required to accept a number of assumptions in respect of the conclusions incorporated in the model. As stated previously, I am constructing a website which aims to describe the model in detail.

AS written the reader has to pretty much make up a whole new theory to guess how you could possibly come to your conclusions.

Originally Posted by revelant

As far as I can gather, this proposed model of the universe is unique. I reached the conclusion that physical reality exists on the 2D surface of a black hole by a different route than that taken by Alan Guth.
This proposal states that the Big Bang which signifies the beginning of the space and time of our own observable universe, was created at specific coordinate in the 3D space of a parent universe by a living organism which exists within that parent universe. Our own observable universe can be regarded as being the child universe of the parent universe.

I have my one idea that is similar to that by Alan Guth. In mine as the energy density of a given point in space build up, so do the number of dimensions. When the density exceeds a certain threshold, dimensionality itself breaks down and spawns a child universe to relieve the strain. The child universe necessarily has fewer dimensions (initially) than the source point in the parent universe.

Originally Posted by revelant

There is physical phenomena which occurs in the universe which can only be initiated by the free will of conscious living organism. More specifically there is a specific physical manoeuvre which creates this phenomena which can only be performed by an intelligent conscious living being.

This is the part that I completely don't get. In Alan Guth's and my model, the spawning of child universes can happen strictly due to fundamental forces and thus does not require any beings to be present, conscious or otherwise.

[revelant]

Originally Posted by wstein

Clearly you left too much out as others are unable to follow along from the 'proposal' to any of your conclusions.

I suggest you write it ALL out somewhere else and put a link to it in this topic.

AS written the reader has to pretty much make up a whole new theory to guess how you could possibly come to your conclusions.

I have my one idea that is similar to that by Alan Guth. In mine as the energy density of a given point in space build up, so do the number of dimensions. When the density exceeds a certain threshold, dimensionality itself breaks down and spawns a child universe to relieve the strain. The child universe necessarily has fewer dimensions (initially) than the source point in the parent universe.

This is the part that I completely don't get. In Alan Guth's and my model, the spawning of child universes can happen strictly due to fundamental forces and thus does not require any beings to be present, conscious or otherwise.

I believe that any emergent alternative theory re. the nature of physical reality, must include the existence of the consciousness of living things as an intrinsic part of the theory.

The notion of a singularity having an infinite density as predicted by GR, is absurd. Our consciousness exists as a fixed point coordinate on the 2D surface of a notional shell/sphere. The diameter/ radius of the shell is determined by the the expansion of a gravity wave at the speed of light and the period of time it takes [after the moment of the Big Bang] for the sphere/shell to materialise.

The Planck shell in which our consciousness exists allows for a complexity of permutations of possible structures of the sub-atomic particles which accommodates the evolution of the intelligence of living organisms within that shell.

The period of time is calculated as the radial line from the nucleus to the point coordinate on the surface of the shell where your consciousness resides. As such, your consciousness can be regarded as static in time. Gravity is created by the unpredictable movement of the living organisms which exist on the surface of the sphere/shell. And the only incentive for a living organism to move is through the application of the free will of the organism.

However, although consciousness is fixed on the surface of the shell, time itself [as represented by gravity waves propagating through free space] continues to be radiated by the stars and galaxies which were formed in the past. Because we experience physical reality from the perspective of a static point on the surface of the sphere, we observe the light and energy which is being radiated from 'interior' past shells as coming from 360 degrees of the sky.

Each subsequent Planck shell accommodates an increasing level of complexity of the structure and crystallization of the sub-atomic particles of matter. Whilst the complexity of an atomic structure remains constant, matter will continue to form within that fixed Planck shell.

The fact that the future path of matter whilst it exists on the static surface of a Planck shell has a perpetual probability of 50/50 allows increasingly more complexity of structures. Whenever a more complex structure is formed, it can only be accomodated in a shell which allows for that increased complexity. The diameter of the new Planck shell is determined by that which accommodates the specific level of complexity of the new particle.

Any increase in complexity of the structure of atoms, molecules and living cells corresponds with an increase in intelligence of the structure. Any increase in the intelligence of a living organism equates with an increase in the relative level of consciousness of that organism.

The evolution of life on our planet equates with the increased complexity of connections between sub-atomic particles at each subsequent Planck shell. This increasing complexity of connections [ and level of intelligence of the structure] with each subsequent shell, eventually evolved over eons of time to accommodate the specific level of intelligence and consciousness of human beings.

Since I am restricted to forum sized posts, I am assuming that the reader possesses slightly more understanding of the principles of GR and QED than that of a layman on the subject, in order to be capable of joining up the dots yourself.

[FallingLeaves]

never mind...

[inavalan]

You might be interested in Itzhak Bentov. He wrote a book, and his wife published another one after his death (in early 1970s). There is at least one youtube video about him.

He expressed very clearly his views and models.