Spiritual Forums

Home


Donate!


Articles


CHAT!


Shop


 
Welcome to Spiritual Forums!.

We created this community for people from all backgrounds to discuss Spiritual, Paranormal, Metaphysical, Philosophical, Supernatural, and Esoteric subjects. From Astral Projection to Zen, all topics are welcome. We hope you enjoy your visits.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will be able to post messages, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos, and gain access to our Chat Rooms, Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please, join our community today! !

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, check our FAQs before contacting support. Please read our forum rules, since they are enforced by our volunteer staff. This will help you avoid any infractions and issues.

Go Back   Spiritual Forums > Spirituality & Beliefs > General Beliefs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-05-2018, 03:07 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Arrow #7 In 7th Integer Position

#7, in the 7th integer position, first caught my eye with Pi^3, so I find all of those within the first 168 invaginations --ergo Pi-Time 66.4 via 65.97-- of my geo-numerical torus.

**31.00 62 7 66 = Pi^3 { XYZ/3D } aka cubing or triangulating
**24.35 22 7 27 = Pi^4 / 4 { renormalization i.e. making Pi-Time 3D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***9.42 47 7 78 === 24-radii via 3 geodesic circles/cycles/loops
**10.99 55 7 41 == 28-radii via 7 ""
**51.83 62 7 79 = 132-radii via 33 " "
**53.40 70 7 42 = 136-radii via 34 "
**54.97 78 7 05 = 140-radii via 35 " "

--------------------------------------------------------------
#7 falls in 6th overall position or 5th irrational

*12.56 77 0 4 ===32 radii via 8 " " circles/cycle/loops
*17.27 87 5 93 == 44-radii via 11 " "
*25.13 27 4 08 == 64 radii via 16 " "
*32.98 67 2 23 == 84 radii via 21 " "
*40.84 07 0 38 = 104-radii via 26 " "

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#7 falls in 5th overall position or 4th irrational

**1.57 07 9 63 26 79 48 9 66 = 4-radii
....via two Pi-based invaginations ergo one circle/cycle/loop.....
**14.13 71 6 67 = 36-radii via 9 " "
**15.70 79 6 3 == 40-radii via 10 " "
**34.55 75 1 86 = 88-radii via 22 "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embolden values highlights all irrationals who first integer is 1 or 9 ergo encourages a whole rational value sort of like how P^3 = 31.00 does

*8-radii = 3.14 15 9 26

....via two geodesic arcs define approximate one great circle "" ""....
**48-radii = 18.84 95 1 6 via 12 "" ""
**52-radii = 20.42 03 5 19 via 13 " "
*56-radii = 21.99 11 4 82
.....via 14 great circle/arcs around tube, not whole torus { geo-numerical }.......
**60-radii = 23.56 19 4 45 via 15 "" ""
**68-radii = 26.70 35 3 71 via 17 "
**72-radii = 28.27 43 3 34 via 18 "
*76-radii = 29.84 51 2 97 via 19 "
**80-radii = 31.41 59 2 6 via 20 "
*92-radii = 36.12 83 1 49 via 23 "
**96-radii = 37.69 91 1 12 via 24 "
*100-radii = 39.26 99 0 75 via 25 "
*108-radii = 42.41 15 001 via 27 "

112-radii = 43.98 22 9 64 via 28 "


*116-radii = 45.55 30 9 27 via 29 "
120-radii = 47.12 38 8 9 via 30 "
*124-radii = 48.69 46 8 53 via 31 "
*128 radii = 50.26 54 8 16 via 32 "
*144 radii = 56.54 86 6 68 via 36 "
148 radii = 58.11 94 6 31 via 37 "
*152 radii = 59.69 02 5 94 via 38 "
*156 radii = 61.26 10 5 57 via 39 "
*160 radii = 62.83 18 5 2 via 40 "
*164 radii = 64.40 26 4 83 via 41 "
168 radii = 65.97 34 4 46 via 42 "
..this is closet we come to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...

*172 radii = 67.54 42 4 09 via 43 "
176 radii = 69.11 50 3 72 via 44 "
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-05-2018, 03:35 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Arrow Key Points of Consideration

My geo-numerical torus derived from four, abstract lines/levels that transpose as four abstract --and broken--- great circles.

1 outer line/level peak of positive shaped curvature of Space { Gravitational--graviton{s} }
-
1 inside line/level as peak of sine-wave topology
1 inside line/level as peak of sine-wave topology
-
1 inner line/level as peak of negative shaped curvature of Space { Dark Energy--darkion{s} }
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pi-Time value 66.4 is approximated via the following;

168-radii = 65.97 34 4 46 via 84 invgainations and 42 great circle/cycle/loops around tube --smaller radius value--- not the whole torus ---larger radius value---.
..this is closet we come to 66.4 { Pi-Time } as derived from,
.... Pi^4{ 97.4 }, minus XYZ/3D 31{ Pi^3 = 31. 00 62 '7' 66 }
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**31.00 62 '7' 66 = Pi^3 { XYZ/3D } aka cubing or triangulating
**24.35 22 '7' 27 = Pi^4 / 4 { renormalization i.e. making Pi-Time 3D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***9.42 47 7 '7' 8 === 24-radii via 3 geodesic circles/cycles/loops
**10.99 55 '7' 41 == 28-radii via 7 circles/cycles/loops
**51.83 62 '7' 79 = 132-radii via 33 circles/cycles/loops
**53.40 70 '7' 42 = 136-radii via 34 circles/cycles/loops
**54.97 78 '7' 05 = 140-radii via 35 circles/cycles/loops
--------------------------------------------------------------
#7 falls in 6th overall position or 5th irrational

*12.56 77 0 4 ===32 radii via 8 circles/cycle/loops
*17.27 87 5 93 == 44-radii via 11 circles/cycles/loops
*25.13 27 4 08 == 64 radii via 16 circles/cycles/loops
*32.98 67 2 23 == 84 radii via 21circles/cycles/loops
*40.84 07 0 38 = 104-radii via 26 circles/cycles/loops
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#7 falls in 5th overall position or 4th irrational

*1.57 07 9 63 26 79 48 9 66 = 4-radii via two Pi-based invaginations/inversions ergo one circle/cycle/loop
*14.13 71 6 67 = 36-radii via 9 circles/cycles/loops
*15.70 79 6 3 == 40-radii via 10 circles/cycles/loops
*34.55 75 1 86 = 88-radii via 22 circles/cycles/loops
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I list the following because they are close to a whole rational value { to Fuller significant } or interesting for other reasons

Pi derived value.....# of radii.........# of inversions/invaginations...# of circles/cycles/loops..
...v...............................v.............. ........v......................................... ..................v

3.14 15 9 26 = 8 radii ergo 4 Pi-based invaginations via 2 circles/cycles/loops

21.99 11 4 82 = 56-radii ergo 28 invaginations/inversions via 14 great circles/cycles/loops

28.27 43 3 34 = 72-radii = ergo 9 invaginations/inverions via 18 circles/cycles/loops

36.12 83 1 49 = 92-radii ergo 46 invaginations/inversions via 23 circles/cycles/loops

43.98 22 9 64 = 112-radii ergo 72 invaginations/inversions via 28 circles/cycles/loops

45.55 30 9 27 = 116-radii ergo 54 invaginations/inverions via 29 circles/cycles/loops

47.12 38 8 9 = 120-radii ergo 60 invaginations/inverions via 30 circles/cycles/loops
....60 left and 60 right right-angle triangles on surface of 5{phi}-fold icosa{20}hedron....

58.11 94 6 31 = 148 radii ergo 74 inversions/invagination via 37 circles/cycles/loops

69.11 50 3 72 = 176 radii ergo 88 inversions/invagination via 44 circles/cycles/loops
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-05-2018, 10:56 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Book1 To Nature Grows Regardging 3, 6, 9 Options

Nature, i've been familir with the quote of 3, 6 9attributed to Tesla, however, there is no conclusive evidence he stated that and even if there was there is no additonal info that really explaisn why he would have stated such.

The info you ggave Ive seen for years but has not much relevance to my 4 lines/levels or the geo-numerical torus.

I'm open to any connections you may see between the two. I just dont see any of much significance.

They get into 3 + 6 = 9 and that likened to classical numerology which I do do have not done with 99% of my posted information.

What I need is someone with the ability to animate my as set of two or more of my geo-numerical toroidal patterns sharing and common center and see where they the single trajectories could interfere/interact.

"All mass is interaction"..Richard P Feynman.

All mass is interference/interaction...r6

I would love to see how how the sine-waves and/or arc's could potentially interfere/interact.

I dunno if I can there exist any new or valid correlations exist with my pathway of explorations. I dare to be naive and keep going forward with what I have to work with and technical skills.

Thx for the info. Maybe I will see a correlation that that stuff someday that is significant for my explorations. Only time will tell who are what may appear to us.
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-05-2018, 08:14 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Whole Rationals and Interstices Inbetween

Close to whole rational number with the { interstices } in-between
....3....{ 7 }....11
..11..{ 10 }....22
..44..{ 10 }....55
..55..{ 10 }....66
..66..{ 10 }....77
..77..{ 10 }....88
..99..{ 10 }..110
110..{ 10 }..121
121..{ 10 }..132

Pi = 3.1 41 59 2 65 = 8 radii
....rounds to 3.....

10.99 55 7 4 = 28-radii ergo 14 inversions/invaginations via 7 circles/cycles/loops around shorter radius tube not longer radius whole torus
.......10.99 rounds to 11 and #28 is magic number of stability.....

21.99 11 4 82 = 56-radii ergo 28 inversion/invaginations via 14 great circles/cycles/loops
...21.99 rounds to 22...................

43.98 22 9 64 = 112-radii 56 inversions/invaginations via 28 circles/cycles/loops
...43.98 rounds to 44...........

54.97 78 7 05 = 140 radii 70 inverions/invaginations via 35 circles/cycles/loops
...54.97 rounds to 55...

65.97 34 4 46 = 168 radii ergo 84 inversions/invaginations via 42 circles/cycles/loops
..65.97 rounds to 66.34 and that is close to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...

76.96 90 2 00 1 =196 radii ergo 98 inversions/invaginations 49 circles/cycles/loops
..76.97 rounds to 77.....

87.96 45 9 43 00 51 42 = 224 radii erg 112 inversions/invaginations = 56 circles/cycles/loops
.....87.96 rounds to 88.......

98.96 01 6 85 88 07 84 = 252 radii ergo 126 inversions/invaginations = 63 circles/cycles/loops
...98.96 rounds to 99........

109.9 55 7 42 87 56 42 = 280 radii erg 140 inversions/invaginations = 70 circles/cycles/loops
.....rounds to 110............

120.9 51 3 17 16 3 radii 154 inversions/invaginations = 77 circles/cycle/loops
...120.95 rounds to 121......

131.9 46 8 91 45 07 71 31 60 15 radii ergo 168 inversions.invaginations = 84 circles/cycles/loops
...131.94 rounds to 132....
----------------------------------------------------------


Pi-halved = 1.57079632679489 66 192313216916398
.....66 appears in the 16th position.....
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-05-2018, 03:21 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Talking H,mmm?

61.20 39 3 69 = Pi^5 / 5 ergo renormalization back to XYZ/3D
...20 amino acids encoded by 61 codons.....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Space ( time * time )i ( time * time ) Space
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>< = time/frequency ^v^v { Observed/Quantised } /\/\/

( ) = gravitational space { occupied }

)( = dark energy space {occupied }

i = metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concepts ex concept of space not a space ergo i is ego and most pertains only to complex consciousness

* * = bilateral consciousness

Close to whole rational number with the { interstices } in-between
....3....{ 7 }....11
..11..{ 10 }....22
..44..{ 10 }....55
..55..{ 10 }....66
..66..{ 10 }....77
..77..{ 10 }....88
..99..{ 10 }..110
110..{ 10 }..121
121..{ 10 }..132

Pi = 3.1 41 59 2 65 = 8 radii
....rounds to 3.....

10.99 55 7 4 = 28-radii ergo 14 inversions/invaginations via 7 circles/cycles/loops around shorter radius tube not longer radius whole torus
.......10.99 rounds to 11 and #28 is magic number of stability.....

21.99 11 4 82 = 56-radii ergo 28 inversion/invaginations via 14 great circles/cycles/loops
...21.99 rounds to 22...................

43.98 22 9 64 = 112-radii 56 inversions/invaginations via 28 circles/cycles/loops
...43.98 rounds to 44...........

54.97 78 7 05 = 140 radii 70 inverions/invaginations via 35 circles/cycles/loops
...54.97 rounds to 55...

65.97 34 4 46 = 168 radii ergo 84 inversions/invaginations via 42 circles/cycles/loops
..65.97 rounds to 66.34 and that is close to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...

76.96 90 2 00 1 =196 radii ergo 98 inversions/invaginations 49 circles/cycles/loops
..76.97 rounds to 77.....

87.96 45 9 43 00 51 42 = 224 radii erg 112 inversions/invaginations = 56 circles/cycles/loops
.....87.96 rounds to 88.......

98.96 01 6 85 88 07 84 = 252 radii ergo 126 inversions/invaginations = 63 circles/cycles/loops
...98.96 rounds to 99........

109.9 55 7 42 87 56 42 = 280 radii erg 140 inversions/invaginations = 70 circles/cycles/loops
.....rounds to 110............

120.9 51 3 17 16 3 radii 154 inversions/invaginations = 77 circles/cycle/loops
...120.95 rounds to 121......

131.9 46 8 91 45 07 71 31 60 15 radii ergo 168 inversions.invaginations = 84 circles/cycles/loops
...131.94 rounds to 132....
----------------------------------------------------------
Pi-halved = 1.57079632679489 66 192313216916398
.....66 appears in the 16th position.....[/quote]
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 25-05-2018, 03:52 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color Axis Spin, Geodesics, Motion, Time, Frequency,

Space ( time * time ) i ( time * time ) Space

Space ( >*< ) i (>*< ) Space

Space ( /\/\/ ) i ( \/\/\ ) Space

Fullers 5th dimension/power is spin ergo motion ergo geodesic trajectory of six chords and 4 vertexes of minimal 3D structure of Universe, the tetrahedron.

Motion = Observed Time as s frequency of nodal events { occupied space } all of which are on greater or lesser geodesic trajectories ergo vectors having momentum and direction that are always falling into or out of one system in relations to another.

Metaphysical-1 time is conceptual spaces ---not actual space--- between events or lags between this event and the next nodal event.

Pi is geodesic circle { spin/spun } ratioed to diameter { 2 radii v or as ^ }.

61.26 10 5 57 = 156 radii via 39 great interstitial great circles

306.0 19 6 84 = Pi^5

61.20 39 3 69 = Pi^5 / 5 ergo renormalization back to XYZ/3D
...20 amino acids encoded by 61 codons.....

#3 falls in 7th,overall, integer position of 61.20 39 3 69 and we find that 39 3 69 are intimately correlated to #3

.....Pi^3 = 31.00 62 7 66
Pi^4 / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27 58 500609309110083172176

5{phi}-fold icosahedrons 31 primary great circles come in 3 sets, 6, 10, and 15.

4-fold VE/cubo-octahedron --operating system of Universe-- 14 faces has 4 axis sets 3, 4, 6, and 12

3 + 4 = 7 Universal primary sets great circles total to 56 primary great circles ---7 * 8 = 56---

61.20 39 3 69 57 0 56 29 0 65 25 48 26 2 00 86 87
..I also take note of39, 3 69 all being intimated to #3....
...then we find 57 and 56 .................

Fuller makes note of the fact that that the Icosahedron and VE both produce one axis of spin greater than their number of chords ie;

30 chords of icosahedron results in 31 primary great circles

24 chords of VE results in 25 primary great circles

Quote:
Originally Posted by r6r6r
Close to whole rational number with the { interstices } in-between
....3....{ 7 }....11
..11..{ 10 }....22
..44..{ 10 }....55
..55..{ 10 }....66
..66..{ 10 }....77
..77..{ 10 }....88
..99..{ 10 }..110
110..{ 10 }..121
121..{ 10 }..132

Pi = 3.1 41 59 2 65 = 8 radii
....rounds to 3.....

10.99 55 7 4 = 28-radii ergo 14 inversions/invaginations via 7 circles/cycles/loops around shorter radius tube not longer radius whole torus
.......10.99 rounds to 11 and #28 is magic number of stability.....

21.99 11 4 82 = 56-radii ergo 28 inversion/invaginations via 14 great circles/cycles/loops
...21.99 rounds to 22...................

43.98 22 9 64 = 112-radii 56 inversions/invaginations via 28 circles/cycles/loops
...43.98 rounds to 44...........

54.97 78 7 05 = 140 radii 70 inverions/invaginations via 35 circles/cycles/loops
...54.97 rounds to 55...

65.97 34 4 46 = 168 radii ergo 84 inversions/invaginations via 42 circles/cycles/loops
..65.97 rounds to 66.34 and that is close to 66.4 { Pi-Time }...

76.96 90 2 00 1 =196 radii ergo 98 inversions/invaginations 49 circles/cycles/loops
..76.97 rounds to 77.....

87.96 45 9 43 00 51 42 = 224 radii erg 112 inversions/invaginations = 56 circles/cycles/loops
.....87.96 rounds to 88.......

98.96 01 6 85 88 07 84 = 252 radii ergo 126 inversions/invaginations = 63 circles/cycles/loops
...98.96 rounds to 99........

109.9 55 7 42 87 56 42 = 280 radii erg 140 inversions/invaginations = 70 circles/cycles/loops
.....rounds to 110............

120.9 51 3 17 16 3 radii 154 inversions/invaginations = 77 circles/cycle/loops
...120.95 rounds to 121......

131.9 46 8 91 45 07 71 31 60 15 radii ergo 168 inversions.invaginations = 84 circles/cycles/loops
...131.94 rounds to 132....
----------------------------------------------------------
Pi-halved = 1.57079632679489 66 192313216916398
.....66 appears in the 16th position.....
[/quote]
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-06-2018, 03:19 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color

>< = six nodal events and ivve laid that out as pattern in prior post using four lines/levels.

Two invaginations of spiral circle equal value for four{ 4 } radii of same spiral circle.

(--) = Pi via circle and diameter

-(--)- = Pi via circle with double diameter value.

I believe that Pi would be one/half of normal Pi value ergo;

1.5 70 79 6 32 67 94 89 66 19 23 13 21 69 16 398

For each great circle arc around the tube, there are two invaginations/inversions ergo 6 nodal events.

These nodal events become vertexial events, once we involve two or more geo-numerical tubes interfering/interacting at some angle --ex 90 degrees to each other--- and sharing a common center,

Or even not sharing a common center but interacting/interfering as chain of link geo-numerical torus.

A nodal event has only two lines of relationship associating

A vertex has three or more lines-of-relationship associating.

This is where 2D is actually wholistically interfering/interacting tori.

Pi is geodesic circle { spin } ratioed to diameter and that is specifically 4 radii in my geo-numerical torus ergo v or as ^ as frequency /\/\/ occurring within the geodesics of gravity ( ) and dark energy )( as geo-numerical torus.
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15-06-2018, 03:58 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Arrow Various Ways To Envision a Tube > Torus

Triangle is 2D it three corners V nodal points.

If place 3rd nodal point in center of 2D triangle those nodal points inherently become vertexions/vertexia ie point of three lines-of-relationship ergo Y

\Y/ is likened to birds eye view of 3D tetrahedron having four vertexes/vertexions or as subdivided 2D triangle. However once the central vertex moves outside of the 2D plane, we have 3D implied and inferred, or we could just say we have warped 2D.

However, if we have the central vertex oscillate between both sides of 2D plane, <|> then we have oscillating motion between 3D tetrahedron that outside-out and inside-out. This can also be viewed/perceived as di-pyramid i.e 5 vertexes if we consider inside central vertex being split in two pieces or being in two places at nearly same time.

However, if the this 2D set of three outer vertexes as a 2D plane, spinning left or right is another motion happening at 90 degrees the oscillating back-n-forth of central vertex.

1} However, let us drop the idea of the di-pryamid{ 5 vertexes } and instead only consider the three outer vertexes spinning of 2D plane{ 3 vertexes }.

2} now let us consider the the 2D triangle plane expanding, and then contracting, the expanding, the contracting. Similar to heart expanding and contracting thump, thump thump.

3} and as the outer three vertexes move outward then back inward, the central vertex is oscillating back-n-forth.

4} and let us consider that this spinning, expanding-contracting, oscillating 2D/3D set is also moving forward on a trajectory as it spins{ left or right } and oscillates back-n-forth.

<|><|><|><|><|><|><|>

and since it is spinning, it defines overtime, a tube if not a spiral tube


> ///////////////////////// >


__________________________________________________ _outer surface of tube

..........* Hi *.....inside the tube.......* Hi *.................

__________________________________________________
outer surface of tube
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 18-06-2018, 08:08 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Book1 Generalized vs Special-case

Quote:
Originally Posted by r6r6r
__________________________________________________ _outer surface of tube

..........* Hi *.....inside the tube.......* Hi *.................
__________________________________________________ outer surface of tube


The above tube can at best only have one reference to Pi.


However, if we consider the above tube to come around and meet itself this linear tube becomes a torus.


A torus, in conventional/classical understanding has two great circles ergo two primary considerations of specific Pi associations.


And these two catagories of great circle can be identified as being 90 degrees to each other and further more we assign the words horizontal and vertical as an aid to visualization of 90 degrees to each other;


1} ( ( hole ) ) = horizontal equaltorial bisection of torus can also reveal, outer, inner, top and bottom circles that are not equaltorial,



2} ( left )( right ) = vertical bisection of can reveal great circle that bisects the tube of the torus, the great circle is left or right of center hole of torus,


See this link for above as XY horizontal plane and Z as vertical bisection plane



3} there is a third kind of great circle, Villenau, that is a diagonal plane bisection of whole torus, that is combination of both vertical and horizontal.


The latter #3 is not part of my concerns, at this time.


So when I present Pi, it has mostly been in regards to an abstract, most generalized Pi, that can be referenced to any abstract sphere, or any of of3 kinds of torus equatorial bisection, also producing a great circle.


If Pi is relevant to specifics I mention above, Ive not yet presented any such findings/discoveries.


With a sphere there is not vertical or horizontal inferred/implied until an abstract axis has been specified/define/located.


With a torus vertical and horizontal is inherent because of two special-case findings of at least two great circles, that are at 90 degrees to each and that is determined by geometry of being a torus shape.


If I become aware of special-case Pi becoming more significant to great circles of a torus, I will happily bring that to others attention. At this time all of my Pi presentation is a an abstract generalization.
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-07-2018, 03:21 PM
r6r6 r6r6 is offline
Newbie ;)
Master
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,071
  r6r6's Avatar
Color Recalling How I Got Here

Recalling how I got to this place of dual integer/digit significance.

P^3 - 31.00 62 7 66 has the 00 ergo we have to go to 1000ths away from the whole number to find the first value of significance, if any. Since it was two digits I follow that pattern.

2 * 31 = 62 and 7 isolated I explain later below, then back to dual digits.

But when I renormalize Pi^4 via division-by-itself{ 4 } is there significance { if any } of integer set of 35 on right side of decimal point in P^4 divided by 4?

Pi^4/4 = 24.35 22 7 27 and 7 * 5 = 35.

3 * 22 = 66 and Pi^4 - 31 = 66.40 90 9 10 34 00 24{ 4-fold VE chords }

Pi^3{XYZ/3D } = 31{ XYZ/3D } ergo 31 great circle/planes of icosa{20}hedron is maximal volumetric embracement by any regular/symmetrical polyhedron of Universe

...............P^3 = 31.00 62 7 66 80 29 98 is 15 digits

..............Pi^4 = 97.40 90 9 10 34 00 24 is 15 digits

............P^4/4 = 24.35 22 7 27 58 50 06 is 15 digits

P^4 - 31{ 3D } = 66.40 90 9 10 34 00 24 is 15 digits

15 is the maximum number of great planes ---as defined 5-fold icosaehedrons, 3 axis sets of 6, 10 and 15,

or by the 4-fold cubo-octahedron/Vector Equlibrium{ VE } axis sets of 3, 4, 6 and 12.

3, 4, 6, 12 and 6, 10 15 = 7 axis sets of primary great circles/planes.

Take note that, the 4 hexagonal, great circle/planes that the define the cubo-octahedron have 14 surface planes/openings ergo ergo 7 axi{ 3 and 4 } related to those 8 triangles and 6 squares

5 * 5 = 25 > 25 great circle/planes of VE/cubo-octahedron

7 * 5 - 35 > Pi^4/4 = 24.35 22 7 27

3 * 5 = 15 > 15 great circles/planes of the icosa{ 20 }ehedron

4 * 5 = 20 > 20 faces of icosa{20}hedron

2 * 5 = 10 > 10 great circles/planes of icosahedron{ define 5 VE's }

6 * 5 = 30 > 30 edges/chord of the icosa{20}hedron

3.14 15 92 65 35 89 79 ergo #5 is the fifth digit/integer in Pi


Arthur Young, inventor of the Bell helicoptor was big on #7 and specifically as it associates to the torus. 7 color mapping of a torus surface.

Whereas Youngs four level lines begain with #1, mine began with non-counting #0 and that makes all the differrence to the all prime numbers ---except 2 and 3--- falling on one line/level.

The cycles of my geo-numerical TIME and SPACE--SPACE are hexagonal, overlapping shifting nucleus

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,

6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

......1......................5..............7...........................11..........13...outer positive
0....................................6..........................................12.......inside
...................3........................................9.............................inside
............2...........4...........................8...........10.......................inner negative

1{ outer }, 2{ inner }, 3{ inside } geo-numerical tube

5-7, 11-13, 17-19, { twin primes },


#23 is 7th prime number on that line{ excluding #1 } and 25{ 25 great circles of cubo-octahedron/VE } is the first break of that pattern.

Pi^4 = 97.40 90 9 10 34 00 24 2

Ive often thought of what signficance resides in that resultant above, if any. Well, #4, and lots of zeros. And in Synergetics Fuller shows how #9 is related to zero.

And of course the cubo-octahedron defined by its four great hexagonal planes is also called the Vector Equilibrium{ VE} ergo zero pulsation between positive and negative of its 8 tetrahedrons.

VE = zero pulsation, zero oscillations, perfect equilbrium ergo untainted ergo exists only as a metaphysical-1, mind/intellect/concept.
__________________
"Dare to be naive"... R. B. Fuller

"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) Spiritual Forums