The Direct Approach.

[Iamit]

Originally Posted by revolver

The feeling of not being connected is just that, a feeling, we are all connected, in fact there is really no connection, that would be duality, there is only One and not even that.

For some not feeling connected to source or whatever label is used for that which is without distinction or discrimination, can be very profoundly uncomfortable.

Thee is nothing but duality. There is not somewhere within duality that is non duality. Wiithin duality the idea may be encountered that despite the appearance of difference, All is One. Its just an idea but there can be a resonance with it that ends the feeling of disconnection for some, depending on a vibration/frequency match. It should also be said that feeling disconnected is also Oneness manifest so as not to imply that those who feel disconnected are in anyway lacking in terms of connection.

Originally Posted by davidsun

Only? I don't at all 'get' this. I happen to think that the only way to really (as opposed to merely 'solipsistically") relate to THAT which IS is via relating to its 'itchy' (in many cases at least) re-presentatives.
.

May all notice that it is not I who initiate contact with this person.

With tough loving contempt
Eelco

[revolver]

Originally Posted by Iamit

For some not feeling connected to source or whatever label is used for that which is without distinction or discrimination, can be very profoundly uncomfortable.

Thee is nothing but duality. There is not somewhere within duality that is non duality. Wiithin duality the idea may be encountered that despite the appearance of difference, All is One. Its just an idea but there can be a resonance with it that ends the feeling of disconnection for some, depending on a vibration/frequency match. It should also be said that feeling disconnected is also Oneness manifest so as not to imply that those who feel disconnected are in anyway lacking in terms of connection.

Yes that may be so, but again no matter how you feel doesn't really mean anything, we are all One and feeling are from the mind body organism which mostly believes itself separate and craves the feeling of being connected.

[Iamit]

Originally Posted by revolver

Yes that may be so, but again no matter how you feel doesn't really mean anything, we are all One and feeling are from the mind body organism which mostly believes itself separate and craves the feeling of being connected.

Yes that may be so for some as it is for you. My dealings tend to be with those for whom it is distressingly not so and the question arises about how there may be movement from one state to the other.

[revolver]

Originally Posted by Iamit

Yes that may be so for some as it is for you. My dealings tend to be with those for whom it is distressingly not so and the question arises about how there may be movement from one state to the other.

There is no other state, its all in your mind, and the mind only.

[Joe Mc]

Originally Posted by swampgrl

Oh, so an 'authority' described it and that that? It doesn't work that way.

Silly Pandora.

Not sure if your involved in this thread anymore but as I read through it, I saw some kind of consensus developing against you ?? Where or why it arose is baffling to read. Was it a gender thing, was it a plane, was it john wayne, hard to figure out. When this happens it reminds me when in my life i've been involved in group learning situations, teacher training etc, the way a consensus can build around several things, a group mentality, a herd mentality perhaps that kind of thing, for that to exist there has to be an outsider i suppose, jesus, the criminal , the man or woman who doesn't quit fit in or even an idea or ideas which could be the case here. I saw 'them ' trying to do this to you here without little effect i might add but it makes me wonder where this consensus comes from especially in something as 'unsayable' as non duality. It's interesting if nothing else to have seen that happening here. Thanks for letting me share Joe.

[davidsun]

Originally Posted by catsquotl

May all notice that it is not I who initiate contact with this person.

With tough loving contempt
Eelco

Originally Posted by davidsun

Oh don't act all surprised..
You're a jerk. And the sooner you stop talking to me the sooner I'll stop responding to your infantile mucking about.

With love
Eelco

[swampgrl]

Originally Posted by Joe Mc

Not sure if your involved in this thread anymore but as I read through it, I saw some kind of consensus developing against you ?? Where or why it arose is baffling to read. Was it a gender thing, was it a plane, was it john wayne, hard to figure out. When this happens it reminds me when in my life i've been involved in group learning situations, teacher training etc, the way a consensus can build around several things, a group mentality, a herd mentality perhaps that kind of thing, for that to exist there has to be an outsider i suppose, jesus, the criminal , the man or woman who doesn't quit fit in or even an idea or ideas which could be the case here. I saw 'them ' trying to do this to you here without little effect i might add but it makes me wonder where this consensus comes from especially in something as 'unsayable' as non duality. It's interesting if nothing else to have seen that happening here. Thanks for letting me share Joe.

Thank you for that, Joe.

Likened the event to trying to describe a scenery while another is taking selfies in said description. Of course the description is going to be different with the added 'self-ie' but that was not the intent.

In the past I've carelessly done the same thing (apologies BT) though seldom witnessed it so blatantly from another perspective. Chalking it up to a discovery experience.

[davidsun]

Originally Posted by catsquotl

Oh don't act all surprised.

I wasn't 'surprised'. 'Eek' means many things.

You're a jerk.[/quote]
I 'get' that that's how you see me.

Originally Posted by catsquotl

And the sooner you stop talking to me the sooner I'll stop responding to your infantile mucking about.

Believe it or not, I wasn't specifically talking to you. I was sharing my perspective with anyone/everyone interested in considering it - it related to things I had previously said, I thought - in response to the comments (perspectives) you shared in this publicly accessible forum.