Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaere
Then why does it only say "the possibility of communication, through mediumship"...? If other methods of communication are acceptable, then it should be included in such a statement of fundamentals. Perhaps "through mediumship or other methods of communication" would work.
What are the other acceptable methods of communication then? What is unacceptable?
|
Kaere, in regard to the highlighted text of the quote above - In UK's Spiritualism, all communication from the spirit world is viewed as an experiment by their Spiritualist mediums. This is because no spirit communicator or spirit communication can ever be guaranteed.
Obviously all medium's rely on the interaction of spirit person for a spirit communication to become possible. If there isn't a spirit communicator, then one should assume the message is of a psychic nature rather than one of mediumship.