Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JustASimpleGuy
You're saying the Divine isn't Absolute?
|
I am saying that
everything is 'divine' and 'absolutely' what
it is and will be as it is and
will be.
Your use of the words 'absolute' and 'divine' strikes me as being a blatant
attempt to
co-opt what they (
really, IMO) mean to 'suit'
yourself - making them and consequently
your connection to what they represent (to you) 'special'.
This is the height of 'dualism' which has infected and plagued
nominally monistic (i.e non-dual) philosophies and adherents who 'religiously' believe in them since time immemorial.
Its way past time to 'wake up' to this
fact - before 'time' just passes you by ...
pretentiously humble' (
by way of falsely believing and so claiming he is just be a 'simple' Guy) fella! Do you believe that the fact that you do
not 'want' anyone else to believe anything other than what they choose to believe
for themselves like you belive what you do (just)
for yourself makes your attitudinality and positjonality 'holistic' ('holy'?, sanctified'?, 'saintly'?) .
My partner and I share two cats and two dogs, all of whom have significantly different,
exquisitely
complex personalities.
None of them may be
legitimately regarded as being 'simple'
IMO, except perhaps by an 'idiot'. Yet you shamelessly dress your 'self' with 'simple' as a 'moniker'.
Transparent ploy that is, in my eyes at least.
Talk to me
if and when you are
ready to
drop using the words/concepts 'absolute' and 'divine' to indicate something being other/superior/better/more valuable than anything/something
else. Meanwhile, please know that I am aghast at your 'falling' for and attempting the propagate the
illusion that something (as differentiated from something
else)
is in
this day and age!