[Internal Queries]

has the definition of "spirit" been established to the satisfaction of all in order to determine and agree that "spirit" can even be killed?

imo, relativism is, as you've aptly demonstrated in your posts, a very slippery slope. you have managed to use vague new agey ideas to deny the existence of cruelty, relieve sadists of responsibility for the pain they enjoy causing and blame the victims of abuse for the abuses perpetrated on them. according to you it seems not even helpless little children are exempt from responsibility for cruelty forced upon them. since cruelty doesn't really exist the agonized suffering and terror little children experience at the hands of some sicko is just their egoistic baby perceptions. pragmatically speaking, that's just ridiculous.

i hope you don't have any children or pets.

and yes... i am judging you via your posts. oopsie!