So now we have two options:
1. The "Peaceful Warrior" who practices 'everything' can rightly be called 'idot'.
2. The "Peaceful Warrior" who practices 'everything' can't rightly be called 'idot'.
as to 1:
That option would be valid if he cannot decide what to practice in order to achieve a specific goal (he hopes for) and therefore he practices 'everything'.
Why would he be rightly called 'idot' then?
Because different practices entail different results and practicing 'everything' therefore would support conflicting causes and thus undermine achieving a specific goal.
as to 2:
That option would be valid if he does not have a specific goal but the unspecific goal of staying busy and therefore he practices 'everything'.
Why would't he be rightly called 'idot' then?
Because practicing 'everything' would support conflicting causes and thus he would achieve his unspecific goal of staying busy because he could go on practicing 'everything' interminably.
